Prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital Among Older Patients with and Without Dementia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01148-3
Marissa A Sakiris, Sarah N Hilmer, Mouna J Sawan, Sarita Lo, Patrick J Kelly, Fiona M Blyth, Andrew J McLachlan, Danijela Gnjidic
{"title":"Prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital Among Older Patients with and Without Dementia.","authors":"Marissa A Sakiris, Sarah N Hilmer, Mouna J Sawan, Sarita Lo, Patrick J Kelly, Fiona M Blyth, Andrew J McLachlan, Danijela Gnjidic","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01148-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older inpatients with dementia are at an increased risk of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the prevalence of ADRs in older inpatients according to dementia status and ADR definition approach and to identify risk factors of ADRs during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 2000 inpatients aged ≥ 75 years admitted consecutively to six Sydney hospitals (1 July 2016 to 31 May 2017). Dementia was defined by diagnosis in electronic medical records. ADRs were defined according to two approaches: the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) and classification by a research pharmacist (subset cohort, n = 600). A binary logistic regression was conducted to determine risk factors of ADRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2000 patients, 25.9% (n = 517) were reported to have dementia. ADRs defined by ICD-10-AM were identified in 8.3% (n = 43) and 14.6% (n = 217) of inpatients with and without dementia respectively (p < 0.001). A total of 13.0% (n = 260) and 12.5% (n = 75) of patients had ADRs defined by ICD-10-AM and a research pharmacist, respectively. Key risk factors of ADRs were longer hospital stay [odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 1.02) and a greater number of regular potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) on admission (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00, 1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADRs were more prevalent among inpatients without dementia and when assessed by a research pharmacist. Our findings underline the need for improved ADR detection in older inpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"833-846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01148-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older inpatients with dementia are at an increased risk of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) during hospitalization.

Objective: To quantify the prevalence of ADRs in older inpatients according to dementia status and ADR definition approach and to identify risk factors of ADRs during hospitalization.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2000 inpatients aged ≥ 75 years admitted consecutively to six Sydney hospitals (1 July 2016 to 31 May 2017). Dementia was defined by diagnosis in electronic medical records. ADRs were defined according to two approaches: the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) and classification by a research pharmacist (subset cohort, n = 600). A binary logistic regression was conducted to determine risk factors of ADRs.

Results: Among 2000 patients, 25.9% (n = 517) were reported to have dementia. ADRs defined by ICD-10-AM were identified in 8.3% (n = 43) and 14.6% (n = 217) of inpatients with and without dementia respectively (p < 0.001). A total of 13.0% (n = 260) and 12.5% (n = 75) of patients had ADRs defined by ICD-10-AM and a research pharmacist, respectively. Key risk factors of ADRs were longer hospital stay [odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01, 1.02) and a greater number of regular potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) on admission (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00, 1.38).

Conclusions: ADRs were more prevalent among inpatients without dementia and when assessed by a research pharmacist. Our findings underline the need for improved ADR detection in older inpatients.

有痴呆症和无痴呆症的老年患者在医院中的药物不良反应发生率。
背景:老年痴呆症住院患者在住院期间发生药物不良反应(ADR)的风险增加:老年痴呆症住院患者在住院期间发生药物不良反应(ADR)的风险增加:根据痴呆状态和 ADR 定义方法量化老年住院患者的 ADR 发生率,并确定住院期间发生 ADR 的风险因素:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为悉尼六家医院连续收治的 2000 名年龄≥ 75 岁的住院患者(2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 5 月 31 日)。痴呆症根据电子病历中的诊断进行定义。ADR根据两种方法定义:《国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类》第十次修订版,澳大利亚修订版(ICD-10-AM)和研究药剂师的分类(子集队列,n = 600)。为确定 ADRs 的风险因素,进行了二元逻辑回归:结果:在 2000 名患者中,25.9%(n = 517)报告患有痴呆症。在有痴呆症和无痴呆症的住院患者中,分别有 8.3%(n = 43)和 14.6%(n = 217)的患者出现了 ICD-10-AM 所定义的 ADR(p 结论:在有痴呆症和无痴呆症的住院患者中,ADR 的发生率更高:在没有痴呆症的住院患者中,由研究药剂师评估的 ADR 更为普遍。我们的研究结果表明,有必要改进老年住院患者的 ADR 检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信