Julia Downey, Kimberly DeVries, Ian Marie Lano, Christopher Baliski
{"title":"False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience.","authors":"Julia Downey, Kimberly DeVries, Ian Marie Lano, Christopher Baliski","doi":"10.1503/cjs.016023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The status of the regional lymph node basin is of prognostic importance in patients with melanoma, making the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) a key component of patient care management, particularly with the advent of immunotherapy for adjuvant treatment. The primary goal of our study was to assess the false-negative rate of SLNBs among patients with melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB by a single surgeon between Jan. 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2020. We extracted and cross-referenced patient demographic and pathologic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 501 patients underwent an SLNB. Of these, 97 (19.4%) patients had pathologically positive sentinel lymph nodes and 404 (80.6%) patients had negative results. The latter were subject to further review; 84 (20.8%) patients subsequently developed recurrence, with 25 (6.2%) recurrences within the primary nodal basin. Isolated regional recurrence occurred in 11 (2.7%) patients and conjunction with a false-negative rate was 10.2%. Unadjusted recurrence rates were similar across each lymph node basin, including the axilla (2.7%), groin (3.6%), and neck (1.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The false-negative SLNB rate was 10.2% for isolated regional recurrences. These findings need to be considered in the era of using adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 5","pages":"E337-E344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The status of the regional lymph node basin is of prognostic importance in patients with melanoma, making the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) a key component of patient care management, particularly with the advent of immunotherapy for adjuvant treatment. The primary goal of our study was to assess the false-negative rate of SLNBs among patients with melanoma.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB by a single surgeon between Jan. 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2020. We extracted and cross-referenced patient demographic and pathologic information.
Results: During the study period, 501 patients underwent an SLNB. Of these, 97 (19.4%) patients had pathologically positive sentinel lymph nodes and 404 (80.6%) patients had negative results. The latter were subject to further review; 84 (20.8%) patients subsequently developed recurrence, with 25 (6.2%) recurrences within the primary nodal basin. Isolated regional recurrence occurred in 11 (2.7%) patients and conjunction with a false-negative rate was 10.2%. Unadjusted recurrence rates were similar across each lymph node basin, including the axilla (2.7%), groin (3.6%), and neck (1.4%).
Conclusion: The false-negative SLNB rate was 10.2% for isolated regional recurrences. These findings need to be considered in the era of using adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with melanoma.
期刊介绍:
The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.