General practice preconception care invitations: a qualitative study of women's acceptability and preferences.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Nishadi Nethmini Withanage, Sharon James, Jessica Botfield, Kirsten Black, Jeana Wong, Danielle Mazza
{"title":"General practice preconception care invitations: a qualitative study of women's acceptability and preferences.","authors":"Nishadi Nethmini Withanage, Sharon James, Jessica Botfield, Kirsten Black, Jeana Wong, Danielle Mazza","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In general practice, primary care providers can potentially use electronic medical records (EMRs) to identify and invite reproductive-aged women with preconception health risk factors to increase their engagement in preconception care (PCC). However, the acceptability of receiving PCC invitations and women's preferences about the invitation process are poorly understood. This study aims to investigate women's acceptability and preferences for receiving PCC invitations from general practice settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited via convenience, purposive and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom from August until November 2023. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductive reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCC invitations sent from general practice are acceptable if the language is sensitive and non-stigmatising. Text or email invitations detailing the importance and scope of the PCC consultation were preferred, after discussing reproductive intentions with a general practitioner or practice nurse. Women with preconception health risk factors or those actively trying to conceive were more likely to engage in PCC. Key strategies to enhance PCC engagement include advertising in waiting rooms, introducing PCC in new patient registration forms, and integrating PCC into holistic care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using EMRs to identify and invite women with preconception health risk factors to increase their engagement in PCC is generally acceptable. Invitations sent via text messages or emails are preferred. It is crucial to use respectful and appropriate language to avoid stigmatising or offending women, particularly those with infertility issues, those who have completed their families, or those who do not wish to have children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In general practice, primary care providers can potentially use electronic medical records (EMRs) to identify and invite reproductive-aged women with preconception health risk factors to increase their engagement in preconception care (PCC). However, the acceptability of receiving PCC invitations and women's preferences about the invitation process are poorly understood. This study aims to investigate women's acceptability and preferences for receiving PCC invitations from general practice settings.

Methods: Participants were recruited via convenience, purposive and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom from August until November 2023. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductive reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken.

Results: PCC invitations sent from general practice are acceptable if the language is sensitive and non-stigmatising. Text or email invitations detailing the importance and scope of the PCC consultation were preferred, after discussing reproductive intentions with a general practitioner or practice nurse. Women with preconception health risk factors or those actively trying to conceive were more likely to engage in PCC. Key strategies to enhance PCC engagement include advertising in waiting rooms, introducing PCC in new patient registration forms, and integrating PCC into holistic care.

Conclusion: Using EMRs to identify and invite women with preconception health risk factors to increase their engagement in PCC is generally acceptable. Invitations sent via text messages or emails are preferred. It is crucial to use respectful and appropriate language to avoid stigmatising or offending women, particularly those with infertility issues, those who have completed their families, or those who do not wish to have children.

全科孕前保健邀请:关于妇女接受程度和偏好的定性研究。
背景:在全科医疗实践中,初级医疗服务提供者可以利用电子病历(EMR)来识别并邀请存在孕前健康风险因素的育龄妇女参与孕前保健(PCC)。然而,人们对接受孕前保健邀请的可接受性以及妇女对邀请过程的偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在调查妇女对接收全科医生发出的孕前保健邀请的接受度和偏好:方法:通过便利、有目的和滚雪球式抽样招募参与者。从 2023 年 8 月到 11 月,通过 Zoom 进行了半结构化访谈。访谈内容逐字记录,并进行归纳式反思主题分析:如果语言敏感且不带有污名化色彩,从全科诊所发出的 PCC 邀请是可以接受的。在与全科医生或执业护士讨论生育意向后,详细说明 PCC 咨询重要性和范围的文本或电子邮件邀请更受欢迎。具有孕前健康风险因素或积极尝试怀孕的妇女更有可能参与 PCC。提高 PCC 参与度的主要策略包括在候诊室做广告、在新患者登记表中介绍 PCC 以及将 PCC 纳入整体护理:结论:使用电子病历识别并邀请存在孕前健康风险因素的妇女参与 PCC 是可以接受的。最好通过短信或电子邮件发出邀请。关键是要使用尊重和适当的语言,避免羞辱或冒犯妇女,尤其是那些有不孕不育问题的妇女、已组建家庭的妇女或不想生育的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信