Human resources for health: a framework synthesis to put health workers at the centre of healthcare.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ogonna N O Nwankwo, Christian Auer, Angela Oyo-Ita, John Eyers, Kaspar Wyss, Günther Fink, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
{"title":"Human resources for health: a framework synthesis to put health workers at the centre of healthcare.","authors":"Ogonna N O Nwankwo, Christian Auer, Angela Oyo-Ita, John Eyers, Kaspar Wyss, Günther Fink, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human resources are a key determinant for the quality of healthcare and health outcomes. Several human resource management approaches or practices have been proposed and implemented to better understand and address health workers' challenges with mixed results particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this framework synthesis was to review the human resources frameworks commonly available to address human resources for health issues in LMIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched studies in Medline, Embase, CAB Global Health, CINAHL (EBSCO) and WHO global Index Medicus up to 2021. We included studies that provided frameworks to tackle human resources for health issues, especially for LMICs. We synthesised the findings using a framework and thematic synthesis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 8574 studies, out of which 17 were included in our analysis. The common elements of different frameworks are (in descending order of frequency): (1) functional roles of health workers; (2) health workforce performance outcomes; (3) human resource management practises and levers; (4) health system outcomes; (5) contextual/cross-cutting issues; (6) population health outcomes and (7) the humanness of health workers. All frameworks directly or indirectly considered themes around the functional roles of health workers and on the outcomes of health workforce activities, while themes concerning the humanness of health workers were least represented. We propose a synthesised Human-Centred Health Workforce Framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several frameworks exist providing different recurring thematic areas for addressing human resources for health issues in LMIC. Frameworks have predominantly functional or instrumental dimensions and much less consideration of the humanness of health workers. The paradigms used in policy making, development and funding may compromise the effectiveness of strategies to address human resources challenges in LMIC. We propose a comprehensive human resources for health framework to address these pitfalls.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11429363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Human resources are a key determinant for the quality of healthcare and health outcomes. Several human resource management approaches or practices have been proposed and implemented to better understand and address health workers' challenges with mixed results particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this framework synthesis was to review the human resources frameworks commonly available to address human resources for health issues in LMIC.

Methods: We searched studies in Medline, Embase, CAB Global Health, CINAHL (EBSCO) and WHO global Index Medicus up to 2021. We included studies that provided frameworks to tackle human resources for health issues, especially for LMICs. We synthesised the findings using a framework and thematic synthesis methods.

Results: The search identified 8574 studies, out of which 17 were included in our analysis. The common elements of different frameworks are (in descending order of frequency): (1) functional roles of health workers; (2) health workforce performance outcomes; (3) human resource management practises and levers; (4) health system outcomes; (5) contextual/cross-cutting issues; (6) population health outcomes and (7) the humanness of health workers. All frameworks directly or indirectly considered themes around the functional roles of health workers and on the outcomes of health workforce activities, while themes concerning the humanness of health workers were least represented. We propose a synthesised Human-Centred Health Workforce Framework.

Conclusions: Several frameworks exist providing different recurring thematic areas for addressing human resources for health issues in LMIC. Frameworks have predominantly functional or instrumental dimensions and much less consideration of the humanness of health workers. The paradigms used in policy making, development and funding may compromise the effectiveness of strategies to address human resources challenges in LMIC. We propose a comprehensive human resources for health framework to address these pitfalls.

卫生人力资源:将卫生工作者置于医疗保健中心的综合框架。
背景:人力资源是决定医疗质量和医疗成果的关键因素。为了更好地理解和应对医务工作者面临的挑战,人们提出并实施了多种人力资源管理方法或实践,但结果不一,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。本框架综述的目的是审查常用的人力资源框架,以解决中低收入国家的卫生人力资源问题:我们在 Medline、Embase、CAB Global Health、CINAHL (EBSCO) 和世界卫生组织全球医学索引(截至 2021 年)中检索了相关研究。我们收录了提供解决卫生人力资源问题框架的研究,尤其是针对低收入、中等收入国家的研究。我们使用框架和专题综合方法对研究结果进行了综合:搜索发现了 8574 项研究,其中 17 项纳入了我们的分析。不同框架的共同要素是(按出现频率降序排列):(1) 医务工作者的职能作用;(2) 医务工作者的绩效成果;(3) 人力资源管理实践和杠杆;(4) 卫生系统成果;(5) 背景/交叉问题;(6) 人口健康成果和 (7) 医务工作者的人文关怀。所有框架都直接或间接地考虑了与卫生工作者的职能作用和卫生工作者活动成果有关的主题,而与卫生工作者的人文关怀有关的主题则最少。我们提出了一个综合的以人为本的卫生工作者框架:有几个框架为解决低收入和中等收入国家的卫生人力资源问题提供了不同的经常性主题领域。这些框架主要是功能性或工具性的,对卫生工作者的人文关怀考虑较少。在政策制定、发展和筹资中使用的范式可能会影响应对低收入和中等收入国家人力资源挑战的战略的有效性。我们提出了一个全面的卫生人力资源框架来解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信