LOCC: a novel visualization and scoring of cutoffs for continuous variables with hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis as an example.

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
George Luo, Toby Chen, John J Letterio
{"title":"LOCC: a novel visualization and scoring of cutoffs for continuous variables with hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis as an example.","authors":"George Luo, Toby Chen, John J Letterio","doi":"10.1186/s12859-024-05932-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interpretation of large datasets, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), for scientific and research purposes, remains challenging despite their public availability. In this study, we focused on identifying gene expression profiles most relevant to patient prognosis and aimed to develop a method and database to address this issue. To achieve this, we introduced Luo's Optimization Categorization Curve (LOCC), an innovative tool for visualizing and scoring continuous variables against dichotomous outcomes. To demonstrate the efficacy of LOCC using real-world data, we analyzed gene expression profiles and patient data from TCGA hepatocellular carcinoma samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To showcase LOCC, we demonstrate an optimal cutoff for E2F1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma, which was subsequently validated in an independent cohort. Compared to ROC curves and their AUC, LOCC offered a superior description of the predictive value of E2F1 expression across various cancer types. The LOCC score, comprised of factors representing significance, range, and impact of the biomarker, facilitated the ranking of all gene expression profiles in hepatocellular carcinoma, aiding in the evaluation and understanding of previously published prognostic gene signatures. We also demonstrate that LOCC does not have the same assumptions required of Cox proportional hazards modeling for accurate analysis. Repeated sampling demonstrated that LOCC scores outperformed ROC's AUC in discriminating predictors from non-predictors. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis revealed significant associations between certain genes and prognosis, such as E2F target genes and G2M checkpoint with poor prognosis, and bile acid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation with good prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we present LOCC as a novel visualization tool for the analysis of gene expression in cancer, particularly for understanding and selecting cutoffs. Our findings suggest that LOCC scores, which effectively rank genes based on their prognostic potential, represent a more suitable approach than ROC curves and Cox proportional hazard for prognostic modeling and understanding in cancer gene expression analysis. LOCC holds promise as an invaluable tool for advancing precision medicine and furthering biomarker research. Further research regarding multivariable integration and validation will help LOCC reach its full potential and establish its utility across diverse cancer types and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05932-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The interpretation of large datasets, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), for scientific and research purposes, remains challenging despite their public availability. In this study, we focused on identifying gene expression profiles most relevant to patient prognosis and aimed to develop a method and database to address this issue. To achieve this, we introduced Luo's Optimization Categorization Curve (LOCC), an innovative tool for visualizing and scoring continuous variables against dichotomous outcomes. To demonstrate the efficacy of LOCC using real-world data, we analyzed gene expression profiles and patient data from TCGA hepatocellular carcinoma samples.

Results: To showcase LOCC, we demonstrate an optimal cutoff for E2F1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma, which was subsequently validated in an independent cohort. Compared to ROC curves and their AUC, LOCC offered a superior description of the predictive value of E2F1 expression across various cancer types. The LOCC score, comprised of factors representing significance, range, and impact of the biomarker, facilitated the ranking of all gene expression profiles in hepatocellular carcinoma, aiding in the evaluation and understanding of previously published prognostic gene signatures. We also demonstrate that LOCC does not have the same assumptions required of Cox proportional hazards modeling for accurate analysis. Repeated sampling demonstrated that LOCC scores outperformed ROC's AUC in discriminating predictors from non-predictors. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis revealed significant associations between certain genes and prognosis, such as E2F target genes and G2M checkpoint with poor prognosis, and bile acid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation with good prognosis.

Conclusion: In summary, we present LOCC as a novel visualization tool for the analysis of gene expression in cancer, particularly for understanding and selecting cutoffs. Our findings suggest that LOCC scores, which effectively rank genes based on their prognostic potential, represent a more suitable approach than ROC curves and Cox proportional hazard for prognostic modeling and understanding in cancer gene expression analysis. LOCC holds promise as an invaluable tool for advancing precision medicine and furthering biomarker research. Further research regarding multivariable integration and validation will help LOCC reach its full potential and establish its utility across diverse cancer types and clinical settings.

LOCC:以肝细胞癌预后为例,对连续变量的临界值进行新颖的可视化和评分。
背景:尽管《癌症基因组图谱》(The Cancer Genome Atlas,TCGA)等大型数据集公开可用,但出于科学和研究目的对这些数据集进行解读仍具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们的重点是识别与患者预后最相关的基因表达谱,并旨在开发一种方法和数据库来解决这一问题。为此,我们引入了罗氏优化分类曲线(Luo's Optimization Categorization Curve,LOCC),这是一种创新的工具,用于对连续变量和二分结果进行可视化和评分。为了利用真实世界的数据展示 LOCC 的功效,我们分析了来自 TCGA 肝细胞癌样本的基因表达谱和患者数据:为了展示 LOCC,我们展示了肝细胞癌中 E2F1 表达的最佳临界值,该临界值随后在一个独立队列中得到了验证。与 ROC 曲线及其 AUC 相比,LOCC 更好地描述了 E2F1 表达在各种癌症类型中的预测价值。LOCC 评分由代表生物标志物重要性、范围和影响的因子组成,有助于对肝细胞癌的所有基因表达谱进行排序,有助于评估和理解以前发表的预后基因特征。我们还证明,LOCC 与 Cox 比例危险度模型所要求的假设条件不同,无法进行准确分析。重复采样表明,LOCC 评分在区分预测因子和非预测因子方面优于 ROC 的 AUC。此外,基因组富集分析显示,某些基因与预后有显著关联,如E2F靶基因和G2M检查点与预后不良有关,而胆汁酸代谢和氧化磷酸化与预后良好有关:总之,我们将 LOCC 作为一种新颖的可视化工具,用于分析癌症中的基因表达,特别是用于理解和选择临界值。我们的研究结果表明,LOCC 评分能有效地根据基因的预后潜力对其进行排序,与 ROC 曲线和 Cox 比例危险相比,LOCC 是一种更适合癌症基因表达分析中预后建模和理解的方法。LOCC有望成为推进精准医疗和生物标记物研究的宝贵工具。有关多变量整合和验证的进一步研究将有助于LOCC充分发挥其潜力,并在不同癌症类型和临床环境中确立其实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信