A Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Free Tissue Transfer, Partial Foot Amputation, and Below-Knee Amputation in High-Risk Limb Salvage Patients.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004078
Christian X Lava, Samuel S Huffman, Karen R Li, John R DiBello, Christopher M Ply, Rachel N Rohrich, John S Steinberg, Jayson N Atves, Kenneth L Fan, Richard C Youn, Christopher E Attinger, Karen K Evans
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Free Tissue Transfer, Partial Foot Amputation, and Below-Knee Amputation in High-Risk Limb Salvage Patients.","authors":"Christian X Lava, Samuel S Huffman, Karen R Li, John R DiBello, Christopher M Ply, Rachel N Rohrich, John S Steinberg, Jayson N Atves, Kenneth L Fan, Richard C Youn, Christopher E Attinger, Karen K Evans","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical decision for limb-salvage with free tissue transfer (FTT), partial foot amputation (PFA), or below-knee amputation (BKA) for complex lower extremity (LE) wounds hinges on several factors, including patient choice and baseline function. However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on LE function, pain, and QoL for chronic LE wound interventions are limited. Thus, the study aim was to compare PROMs in patients who underwent FTT, PFA, or BKA for chronic LE wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROMs were collected via QR code for all adult chronic LE wound patients who presented to a tertiary wound center between June 2022 and June 2023. A cross-sectional analysis of patients who underwent FTT, PFA, or BKA was conducted. The 12-Item Short Survey (SF-12), PROM Information System Pain Intensity (PROMIS-3a), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were completed at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative characteristics, and amputation details were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 200 survey sets, 71 (35.5%) underwent FTT, 51 (25.5%) underwent PFA, and 78 (39.0%) underwent BKA. Median postoperative time points of survey completion between FTT (6.2 months, IQR: 23.1), PFA (6.8 months, IQR: 15.5), and BKA (11.1 months, IQR: 21.3) patients were comparable (P = 0.8672). Most patients were male (n = 92, 76.0%) with an average age and body mass index (BMI) of 61.8 ± 12.6 years and 30.3 ± 7.0 kg/m2, respectively. Comorbidities for FTT, PFA, and BKA patients included diabetes mellitus (DM; 60.6% vs 84.2% vs 69.2%; P = 0.165), peripheral vascular disease (PVD; 48.5% vs 47.4% vs 42.3%; P = 0.790), and chronic kidney disease (CKD; 12.1% vs 42.1% vs 30.8%; P = 0.084). No significant differences were observed between FTT, PFA, and BKA patients in mean overall PROMIS-3a T-scores (49.6 ± 14.8 vs 54.2 ± 11.8 vs 49.6 ± 13.7; P = 0.098), LEFS scores (37.5 ± 18.0 vs 34.6 ± 18.3 vs 38.5 ± 19.4; P = 0.457), or SF-12 scores (29.6 ± 4.1 vs 29.5 ± 2.9 vs 29.0 ± 4.0; P = 0.298).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients receiving FTT, PFA, or BKA for chronic LE wounds achieve comparable levels of LE function, pain, and QoL postoperatively. Patient-centered functionally based surgical management for chronic LE wounds using interdisciplinary care, preoperative medical optimization, and proper patient selection optimizes postoperative PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The surgical decision for limb-salvage with free tissue transfer (FTT), partial foot amputation (PFA), or below-knee amputation (BKA) for complex lower extremity (LE) wounds hinges on several factors, including patient choice and baseline function. However, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on LE function, pain, and QoL for chronic LE wound interventions are limited. Thus, the study aim was to compare PROMs in patients who underwent FTT, PFA, or BKA for chronic LE wounds.

Methods: PROMs were collected via QR code for all adult chronic LE wound patients who presented to a tertiary wound center between June 2022 and June 2023. A cross-sectional analysis of patients who underwent FTT, PFA, or BKA was conducted. The 12-Item Short Survey (SF-12), PROM Information System Pain Intensity (PROMIS-3a), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were completed at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative characteristics, and amputation details were collected.

Results: Of 200 survey sets, 71 (35.5%) underwent FTT, 51 (25.5%) underwent PFA, and 78 (39.0%) underwent BKA. Median postoperative time points of survey completion between FTT (6.2 months, IQR: 23.1), PFA (6.8 months, IQR: 15.5), and BKA (11.1 months, IQR: 21.3) patients were comparable (P = 0.8672). Most patients were male (n = 92, 76.0%) with an average age and body mass index (BMI) of 61.8 ± 12.6 years and 30.3 ± 7.0 kg/m2, respectively. Comorbidities for FTT, PFA, and BKA patients included diabetes mellitus (DM; 60.6% vs 84.2% vs 69.2%; P = 0.165), peripheral vascular disease (PVD; 48.5% vs 47.4% vs 42.3%; P = 0.790), and chronic kidney disease (CKD; 12.1% vs 42.1% vs 30.8%; P = 0.084). No significant differences were observed between FTT, PFA, and BKA patients in mean overall PROMIS-3a T-scores (49.6 ± 14.8 vs 54.2 ± 11.8 vs 49.6 ± 13.7; P = 0.098), LEFS scores (37.5 ± 18.0 vs 34.6 ± 18.3 vs 38.5 ± 19.4; P = 0.457), or SF-12 scores (29.6 ± 4.1 vs 29.5 ± 2.9 vs 29.0 ± 4.0; P = 0.298).

Conclusion: Patients receiving FTT, PFA, or BKA for chronic LE wounds achieve comparable levels of LE function, pain, and QoL postoperatively. Patient-centered functionally based surgical management for chronic LE wounds using interdisciplinary care, preoperative medical optimization, and proper patient selection optimizes postoperative PROMs.

对高风险肢体救治患者进行游离组织转移、足部部分截肢和膝下截肢术后患者报告结果的比较分析》(A Comparative Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Free Tissue Transfer, Partial Foot Amputation, and Below-Knee Amputation in High-Risk Limb Salvage Patients)。
背景:对于复杂的下肢(LE)伤口,采用游离组织转移(FTT)、足部分截肢(PFA)或膝下截肢(BKA)进行肢体修复的手术决定取决于多个因素,包括患者的选择和基线功能。然而,针对慢性下肢(LE)伤口干预的下肢(LE)功能、疼痛和生活质量的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)非常有限。因此,本研究旨在比较接受 FTT、PFA 或 BKA 治疗慢性 LE 伤口的患者的 PROMs:通过 QR 码收集了 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在一家三级伤口中心就诊的所有成年慢性 LE 伤口患者的 PROMs。对接受 FTT、PFA 或 BKA 治疗的患者进行横断面分析。在术后1、3、6个月和1、3、5年完成了12项简短调查(SF-12)、PROM信息系统疼痛强度(PROMIS-3a)和下肢功能量表(LEFS)。此外,还收集了患者的人口统计学资料、合并症、术前特征和截肢详情:在 200 组调查中,71 人(35.5%)接受了 FTT,51 人(25.5%)接受了 PFA,78 人(39.0%)接受了 BKA。FTT(6.2 个月,IQR:23.1)、PFA(6.8 个月,IQR:15.5)和 BKA(11.1 个月,IQR:21.3)患者术后完成调查的中位时间点相当(P = 0.8672)。大多数患者为男性(n = 92,76.0%),平均年龄和体重指数(BMI)分别为 61.8 ± 12.6 岁和 30.3 ± 7.0 kg/m2。FTT、PFA和BKA患者的合并症包括糖尿病(DM;60.6% vs 84.2% vs 69.2%;P = 0.165)、外周血管疾病(PVD;48.5% vs 47.4% vs 42.3%;P = 0.790)和慢性肾脏疾病(CKD;12.1% vs 42.1% vs 30.8%;P = 0.084)。FTT、PFA 和 BKA 患者的平均总体 PROMIS-3a T 分数(49.6 ± 14.8 vs 54.2 ± 11.8 vs 49.6 ± 13.7;P = 0.098)、LEFS评分(37.5 ± 18.0 vs 34.6 ± 18.3 vs 38.5 ± 19.4;P = 0.457)或SF-12评分(29.6 ± 4.1 vs 29.5 ± 2.9 vs 29.0 ± 4.0;P = 0.298):结论:接受 FTT、PFA 或 BKA 治疗慢性 LE 伤口的患者术后 LE 功能、疼痛和 QoL 水平相当。以患者为中心、以功能为基础的慢性左腿伤口手术治疗,采用跨学科护理、术前医疗优化和适当的患者选择,可优化术后PROMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信