High-stakes Technical Performance Assessments Across the Continuum of Surgical Training.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006553
Conor Toale, Dara O Kavanagh, Michael Devine, Marie Morris
{"title":"High-stakes Technical Performance Assessments Across the Continuum of Surgical Training.","authors":"Conor Toale, Dara O Kavanagh, Michael Devine, Marie Morris","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this article is to outline proposals for the use of high-stakes technical performance assessments, defined as assessments of technical skill that take place outside of the operating theatre, across the continuum of surgical training.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Technological advancements have allowed for the assessment of operative technical skills outside of the workplace environment, developed and evaluated in line with modern concepts of assessment validity. With the introduction of competency-based education principles across surgical training curricula, increasing scrutiny is being placed on the validity and reliability of assessments used to inform high-stakes training decisions regarding selection, progression through training, autonomy granting, and end-of-training certification. The role of performance assessments, conducted outside of the workplace environment, is yet to be fully established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article discusses the use of high-stakes performance assessments across the continuum of surgical training, with reference to relevant theories of surgical skill acquisition and assessment, along with contemporary evidence from the performance science literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessments of increasing professional authenticity are required across the continuum of surgical training. In an attempt to capture inherent ability rather than skill at the time of trainee selection, assessments should be of deliberately low levels of professional authenticity. Assessment in early surgical training should focus on ensuring competence in core surgical skills and then assessing for canonical competence across a series of commonly encountered procedures. Baseline competence in these procedures should ideally be assessed before the transition to the (supervised) lead operator, with a view to ensuring patient safety and improving the efficiency of in-theatre training. Assessment later in training relies more heavily on the workplace, with simulation offering a complimentary role in ensuring a minimum competency standard in procedures less likely to be encountered in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-stakes performance assessments can play an important role as part of a programmatic approach to surgical training and certification. They can and should be designed with an appropriate level of professional authenticity to ensure adequate and appropriate representation of the assessment construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this article is to outline proposals for the use of high-stakes technical performance assessments, defined as assessments of technical skill that take place outside of the operating theatre, across the continuum of surgical training.

Background: Technological advancements have allowed for the assessment of operative technical skills outside of the workplace environment, developed and evaluated in line with modern concepts of assessment validity. With the introduction of competency-based education principles across surgical training curricula, increasing scrutiny is being placed on the validity and reliability of assessments used to inform high-stakes training decisions regarding selection, progression through training, autonomy granting, and end-of-training certification. The role of performance assessments, conducted outside of the workplace environment, is yet to be fully established.

Methods: This article discusses the use of high-stakes performance assessments across the continuum of surgical training, with reference to relevant theories of surgical skill acquisition and assessment, along with contemporary evidence from the performance science literature.

Results: Assessments of increasing professional authenticity are required across the continuum of surgical training. In an attempt to capture inherent ability rather than skill at the time of trainee selection, assessments should be of deliberately low levels of professional authenticity. Assessment in early surgical training should focus on ensuring competence in core surgical skills and then assessing for canonical competence across a series of commonly encountered procedures. Baseline competence in these procedures should ideally be assessed before the transition to the (supervised) lead operator, with a view to ensuring patient safety and improving the efficiency of in-theatre training. Assessment later in training relies more heavily on the workplace, with simulation offering a complimentary role in ensuring a minimum competency standard in procedures less likely to be encountered in the workplace.

Conclusions: High-stakes performance assessments can play an important role as part of a programmatic approach to surgical training and certification. They can and should be designed with an appropriate level of professional authenticity to ensure adequate and appropriate representation of the assessment construct.

外科培训过程中的高风险技术性能评估。
目的:本文旨在概述关于使用高风险技术表现评估的建议,高风险技术表现评估是指在手术室外进行的技术技能评估,贯穿外科培训的整个过程:技术进步使手术技术技能评估得以在工作环境之外进行,并根据现代评估有效性概念进行开发和评估。随着以能力为基础的教育原则在外科培训课程中的引入,对评估的有效性和可靠性的审查日益严格,这些评估被用来为有关选拔、培训进展、自主权授予和培训结束认证的高风险培训决策提供依据。在工作环境之外进行的绩效评估的作用尚未完全确定:本文参考外科技能习得和评估的相关理论以及绩效科学文献中的当代证据,讨论了在外科培训过程中使用高风险绩效评估的问题:结果:在外科培训的整个过程中,都需要进行专业性越来越强的评估。为了在选拔学员时掌握学员的固有能力而不是技能,评估应刻意降低专业真实性的水平。早期外科培训的评估应侧重于确保核心外科技能的能力,然后评估一系列常见手术的典型能力。在转为(受监督的)主要操作者之前,最好对这些程序的基线能力进行评估,以确保患者安全并提高手术室内培训的效率。培训后期的评估则更多地依赖于工作场所,而模拟则可发挥辅助作用,确保在工作场所不太可能遇到的程序方面达到最低能力标准:作为外科培训和认证计划的一部分,高风险绩效评估可以发挥重要作用。它们的设计可以而且应该具有适当的专业真实性,以确保充分、适当地体现评估结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信