The association between introduction of the micro-axial flow pump Impella in hospitals and in-hospital mortality in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: interrupted time-series analyses.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jun Nakata, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Toru Takiguchi, Yuji Nishimoto, Mikio Nakajima, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Toshiaki Isogai, Hiroki Matsui, Takeshi Yamamoto, Shoji Yokobori, Kuniya Asai, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"The association between introduction of the micro-axial flow pump Impella in hospitals and in-hospital mortality in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: interrupted time-series analyses.","authors":"Jun Nakata, Hiroyuki Ohbe, Toru Takiguchi, Yuji Nishimoto, Mikio Nakajima, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Toshiaki Isogai, Hiroki Matsui, Takeshi Yamamoto, Shoji Yokobori, Kuniya Asai, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01381-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The micro-axial flow pump Impella, a new mechanical circulatory device for cardiogenic shock, is still only available in a limited number of hospitals, due to the facility certification requirements and insufficient evidence of the benefit of introducing Impella in hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of introducing Impella in hospitals on in-hospital mortality of patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationwide Japanese inpatient database, we identified patients who received ECMO during hospitalization between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2021. A hospital-level propensity score-matched cohort was created matching hospitals that introduced Impella (exposure group) to those that did not introduce Impella (control group). The inclusion period in each hospital was divided into two time periods according to the time of Impella introduction in the exposure group and the corresponding hospital in the control group (before and after exposure). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Uncontrolled and controlled interrupted time-series analyses involved before-after exposure comparison and exposure-control comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 34,379 eligible patients, we created a matched cohort of 8351 patients from 86 hospitals with Impella introduction (exposure group) and 7230 patients from 86 hospitals without Impella introduction (control group). In-hospital mortality before and after exposure was 62.5% and 59.3, respectively, in the exposure group; and 66.8% and 63.7%, respectively, in the control group. Uncontrolled interrupted time-series analysis showed no significant level change or trend change in the before-after exposure comparison in both the exposure and the control groups. Controlled interrupted time-series analysis also showed no significant level change (-0.01%; 95% confidence intervals -5.36% to + 5.33%) or trend change (+ 0.10%, -0.30% to + 0.40%) after exposure in the exposure-control comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nationwide inpatient database study showed no association between Impella introduction in hospitals and in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent ECMO. Because this study confined itself to analze of the impact of the introduction of Impella solely at the hospital level, further detailed studies are warranted to assess its efficacy at the patient level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"151"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01381-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The micro-axial flow pump Impella, a new mechanical circulatory device for cardiogenic shock, is still only available in a limited number of hospitals, due to the facility certification requirements and insufficient evidence of the benefit of introducing Impella in hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of introducing Impella in hospitals on in-hospital mortality of patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods: Using a nationwide Japanese inpatient database, we identified patients who received ECMO during hospitalization between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2021. A hospital-level propensity score-matched cohort was created matching hospitals that introduced Impella (exposure group) to those that did not introduce Impella (control group). The inclusion period in each hospital was divided into two time periods according to the time of Impella introduction in the exposure group and the corresponding hospital in the control group (before and after exposure). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Uncontrolled and controlled interrupted time-series analyses involved before-after exposure comparison and exposure-control comparison.

Results: Out of 34,379 eligible patients, we created a matched cohort of 8351 patients from 86 hospitals with Impella introduction (exposure group) and 7230 patients from 86 hospitals without Impella introduction (control group). In-hospital mortality before and after exposure was 62.5% and 59.3, respectively, in the exposure group; and 66.8% and 63.7%, respectively, in the control group. Uncontrolled interrupted time-series analysis showed no significant level change or trend change in the before-after exposure comparison in both the exposure and the control groups. Controlled interrupted time-series analysis also showed no significant level change (-0.01%; 95% confidence intervals -5.36% to + 5.33%) or trend change (+ 0.10%, -0.30% to + 0.40%) after exposure in the exposure-control comparison.

Conclusions: This nationwide inpatient database study showed no association between Impella introduction in hospitals and in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent ECMO. Because this study confined itself to analze of the impact of the introduction of Impella solely at the hospital level, further detailed studies are warranted to assess its efficacy at the patient level.

医院引入微轴流泵 Impella 与接受体外膜肺氧合治疗的患者院内死亡率之间的关系:间断时间序列分析。
背景:微轴流泵Impella是一种治疗心源性休克的新型机械循环设备,但由于设备认证要求以及没有足够证据表明在医院引入Impella的益处,目前仅在少数医院使用。本研究旨在评估医院引进 Impella 对接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗的患者院内死亡率的影响:我们利用日本全国住院患者数据库,确定了 2014 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间住院期间接受 ECMO 治疗的患者。将引入 Impella 的医院(暴露组)与未引入 Impella 的医院(对照组)进行匹配,建立了医院级倾向得分匹配队列。根据暴露组和对照组相应医院引入 Impella 的时间(暴露前和暴露后),将每家医院的纳入期分为两个时间段。主要结果是院内死亡率。非对照和对照间断时间序列分析包括暴露前后比较和暴露-对照比较:在 34379 名符合条件的患者中,我们建立了一个配对队列,其中包括 86 家医院的 8351 名患者(暴露组)和 86 家医院的 7230 名患者(对照组)。暴露组患者在暴露前后的院内死亡率分别为 62.5% 和 59.3;对照组患者在暴露前后的院内死亡率分别为 66.8% 和 63.7%。非对照间断时间序列分析表明,接触组和对照组在接触前后的比较中没有明显的水平变化或趋势变化。有控制的间断时间序列分析也显示,暴露后与暴露前相比,暴露组与对照组之间没有明显的水平变化(-0.01%;95%置信区间-5.36%至+5.33%)或趋势变化(+0.10%,-0.30%至+0.40%):这项全国住院患者数据库研究表明,医院引进 Impella 与接受 ECMO 患者的院内死亡率之间没有关联。由于这项研究仅限于分析在医院层面引入 Impella 的影响,因此有必要进一步开展详细研究,以评估其在患者层面的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信