Helping patients navigate the immediate release of medical records: MedEd, a novel patient engagement technology.

IF 2.7 3区医学 Q1 SURGERY

American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115977

Bridget Foy, Abigail Ludwigson, Nicole M Mott, Monica Adams, Madeline G Higgins, Sudheer Vemuru, Dulcy Wolverton, Jeniann Yi, Sharon Sams, Chen-Tan Lin, Randy Miles, Nancy Taft, Erin Baurle, Ethan Cumbler, Sarah Tevis

{"title":"Helping patients navigate the immediate release of medical records: MedEd, a novel patient engagement technology.","authors":"Bridget Foy, Abigail Ludwigson, Nicole M Mott, Monica Adams, Madeline G Higgins, Sudheer Vemuru, Dulcy Wolverton, Jeniann Yi, Sharon Sams, Chen-Tan Lin, Randy Miles, Nancy Taft, Erin Baurle, Ethan Cumbler, Sarah Tevis","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Through online health portals, patients receive complex medical reports without interpretation from their healthcare provider. This study evaluated the usability of MedEd, a patient engagement tool providing definitions of medical terminology in breast pathology and radiology reports.Methods: Individuals who underwent a normal screening mammogram were invited to complete semi-structured interviews where they downloaded MedEd and discussed their download experience. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of MedEd were evaluated.Results: 143 individuals were invited to participate, and 14 semi-structured interviews were completed. Participants reported ease of downloading and navigating MedEd with concerns about privacy and others' abilities to download. Participants demonstrated high acceptability (mean 4.48/5, SD 0.95), appropriateness (mean 4.66/5, SD 0.83), and feasibility (mean 4.48/5, SD 1.04) scores.Conclusion: Participants expressed excitement for future use of MedEd and provided suggestions for improvements. Next steps include evaluating comprehension of real breast reports while using MedEd and expanding patient access.","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"115977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Through online health portals, patients receive complex medical reports without interpretation from their healthcare provider. This study evaluated the usability of MedEd, a patient engagement tool providing definitions of medical terminology in breast pathology and radiology reports.

Methods: Individuals who underwent a normal screening mammogram were invited to complete semi-structured interviews where they downloaded MedEd and discussed their download experience. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of MedEd were evaluated.

Results: 143 individuals were invited to participate, and 14 semi-structured interviews were completed. Participants reported ease of downloading and navigating MedEd with concerns about privacy and others' abilities to download. Participants demonstrated high acceptability (mean 4.48/5, SD 0.95), appropriateness (mean 4.66/5, SD 0.83), and feasibility (mean 4.48/5, SD 1.04) scores.

Conclusion: Participants expressed excitement for future use of MedEd and provided suggestions for improvements. Next steps include evaluating comprehension of real breast reports while using MedEd and expanding patient access.

查看原文本刊更多论文

帮助患者了解医疗记录的即时发布：MedEd，一种新颖的患者参与技术。

背景：通过在线健康门户网站，患者可以收到复杂的医疗报告，而无需医疗服务提供者提供解释。MedEd是一款患者参与工具，提供乳腺病理学和放射学报告中医学术语的定义，本研究对MedEd的可用性进行了评估：方法：邀请接受过正常乳房 X 光筛查的个人完成半结构式访谈，在访谈中他们下载了 MedEd 并讨论了他们的下载体验。对 MedEd 的可接受性、适宜性和可行性进行评估：结果：共邀请了 143 人参加，完成了 14 次半结构式访谈。参与者表示下载和浏览 MedEd 很容易，但对隐私和他人下载能力表示担忧。参与者在可接受性（平均 4.48/5，SD 0.95）、适宜性（平均 4.66/5，SD 0.83）和可行性（平均 4.48/5，SD 1.04）方面都获得了很高的分数：参与者对未来使用 MedEd 表示兴奋，并提出了改进建议。下一步工作包括评估使用 MedEd 时对真实乳腺报告的理解能力以及扩大患者的使用范围。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American journal of surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

6.70%

发文量

570

审稿时长

56 days

期刊介绍： The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.