Development and Evaluation of a Rural Longitudinal Neonatal Resuscitation Program Telesimulation Program (MOOSE: Maine Ongoing Outreach Simulation Education).

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Misty Melendi, Allison E Zanno, Jeffrey A Holmes, Micheline Chipman, Anya Cutler, Henry Stoddard, Leah M Seften, Anna Gilbert, Mary Ottolini, Alexa Craig, Leah A Mallory
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Rural Longitudinal Neonatal Resuscitation Program Telesimulation Program (MOOSE: Maine Ongoing Outreach Simulation Education).","authors":"Misty Melendi, Allison E Zanno, Jeffrey A Holmes, Micheline Chipman, Anya Cutler, Henry Stoddard, Leah M Seften, Anna Gilbert, Mary Ottolini, Alexa Craig, Leah A Mallory","doi":"10.1055/a-2421-8486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Neonatal resuscitation is a high-acuity, low-occurrence event and many rural pediatricians report feeling underprepared for these events. We piloted a longitudinal telesimulation (TS) program with a rural hospital's interprofessional delivery room teams aimed at improving adherence to Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines and teamwork.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> A TS study was conducted monthly in one rural hospital over a 10-month period from November 2020 to August 2021. TS sessions were remotely viewed and debriefed by experts, a neonatologist and a simulation educator. Sessions were video recorded and assessed using a scoring tool with validity evidence for NRP adherence. Teamwork was assessed using both TeamSTEPPS 2.0 Team Performance Observation Tool and Mayo High-Performance Teamwork Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We conducted 10 TS sessions in one rural hospital. There were 24 total participants, who rotated through monthly sessions, ensuring interdisciplinary team composition was reflective of realistic staffing. NRP adherence rate for full code scenarios improved from a baseline of 39 to 95%. Compared with baseline data for efficiency, multiple NRP skills improved (e.g., cardiac lead placement occurred 12× faster, 0:31 seconds vs. 6:21 minutes). Teamwork scores showed improvement in all domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our results demonstrate that a TS program aimed at improving NRP and team performance is possible to implement in a rural setting. Our pilot study showed a trend toward improved NRP adherence, increased skill efficiency, and higher-quality teamwork and communication in one rural hospital. Additional research is needed to analyze program efficacy on a larger scale and to understand the impact of training on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Optimal newborn outcomes depend on skillful implementation of NRP.. · Telesimulation can deliver medical education that circumvents challenges in rural areas.. · A longitudinal NRP TS program is possible to implement in a rural setting.. · A rural NRP telesimulation program may improve interprofessional resuscitation performance.. · A rural NRP telesimulation program may improve interprofessional resuscitation teamwork..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2421-8486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  Neonatal resuscitation is a high-acuity, low-occurrence event and many rural pediatricians report feeling underprepared for these events. We piloted a longitudinal telesimulation (TS) program with a rural hospital's interprofessional delivery room teams aimed at improving adherence to Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines and teamwork.

Study design:  A TS study was conducted monthly in one rural hospital over a 10-month period from November 2020 to August 2021. TS sessions were remotely viewed and debriefed by experts, a neonatologist and a simulation educator. Sessions were video recorded and assessed using a scoring tool with validity evidence for NRP adherence. Teamwork was assessed using both TeamSTEPPS 2.0 Team Performance Observation Tool and Mayo High-Performance Teamwork Scale.

Results:  We conducted 10 TS sessions in one rural hospital. There were 24 total participants, who rotated through monthly sessions, ensuring interdisciplinary team composition was reflective of realistic staffing. NRP adherence rate for full code scenarios improved from a baseline of 39 to 95%. Compared with baseline data for efficiency, multiple NRP skills improved (e.g., cardiac lead placement occurred 12× faster, 0:31 seconds vs. 6:21 minutes). Teamwork scores showed improvement in all domains.

Conclusion:  Our results demonstrate that a TS program aimed at improving NRP and team performance is possible to implement in a rural setting. Our pilot study showed a trend toward improved NRP adherence, increased skill efficiency, and higher-quality teamwork and communication in one rural hospital. Additional research is needed to analyze program efficacy on a larger scale and to understand the impact of training on patient outcomes.

Key points: · Optimal newborn outcomes depend on skillful implementation of NRP.. · Telesimulation can deliver medical education that circumvents challenges in rural areas.. · A longitudinal NRP TS program is possible to implement in a rural setting.. · A rural NRP telesimulation program may improve interprofessional resuscitation performance.. · A rural NRP telesimulation program may improve interprofessional resuscitation teamwork..

开发和评估农村纵向 NRP® 远程模拟项目(MOOSE:缅因州持续拓展模拟教育)。
目的:新生儿复苏是一种高敏锐度、低发生率(HALO)的事件,许多农村儿科医生表示对这类事件准备不足。我们在一家农村医院的跨专业产房团队中试行了一项纵向远程模拟(TS)计划,旨在改善对新生儿复苏计划(NRP®)指南的遵守情况和团队合作:在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 8 月的 10 个月期间,每月在一家农村医院开展 TS 研究。专家远程观看并汇报 TS 会议。对会议进行录像,并使用具有 NRP® 遵守有效性证据的评分工具进行评估。团队合作采用 TeamSTEPPS 2.0 团队表现观察工具和梅奥高效团队合作量表进行评估:我们在一家乡镇医院开展了十次 TS 培训。共有 24 人参加,他们每月轮换一次,以确保跨学科团队的组成能够反映现实的人员配备情况。全代码场景的 NRP® 遵守率从基线的 39% 提高到 95%。与效率基线数据相比,多项 NRP® 技能均有提高(例如,心导管置入速度提高了 12 倍)。团队合作得分在所有领域都有所提高:我们的研究结果表明,旨在提高 NRP® 和团队绩效的 TS 计划可以在农村地区实施。我们的试点研究表明,在一家农村医院中,NRP® 的坚持率有所提高,技能效率有所提高,团队合作和沟通质量有所提高。我们还需要开展更多的研究来分析该计划在更大范围内的效果,并了解培训对患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信