Multidisciplinary nutritional support team and mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1111/aas.14531
Tak Kyu Oh, Kyunghwa Lee, Jungwon Cho, In-Ae Song
{"title":"Multidisciplinary nutritional support team and mortality in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"Tak Kyu Oh, Kyunghwa Lee, Jungwon Cho, In-Ae Song","doi":"10.1111/aas.14531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A careful approach is required when providing nutritional support to patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study investigated whether implementing a multidisciplinary nutritional support team (NST) is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a nationwide population-based cohort study, all adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in South Korea with a primary diagnosis of ARDS from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021, were included. The NST comprised four professionals (physicians, full-time nurses, full-time pharmacists, and full-time clinical dietitians). Patients admitted to ICUs with and without the NST system were allocated to the NST and non-NST groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis comprised a total of 15,555 patients with ARDS. Among them, 6615 (42.5%) were in the NST group, and 8940 (57.5%) were in the non-NST group. After adjusting for covariates in the multivariable logistic regression, the NST group showed a 19% lower 30-day mortality than the non-NST group (odds ratio: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.87, p < .001). Furthermore, after adjusting for covariates in multivariable Cox regression, the NST group showed a 12% lower 1-year all-cause mortality than the non-NST group (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.92, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NST implementation was associated with enhanced 30-day and 1-year survival rates in patients with ARDS. These findings indicate that nutritional support provided by the NST may influence the survival outcomes of patients with ARDS in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1487-1493"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A careful approach is required when providing nutritional support to patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study investigated whether implementing a multidisciplinary nutritional support team (NST) is associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with ARDS.

Methods: In a nationwide population-based cohort study, all adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in South Korea with a primary diagnosis of ARDS from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021, were included. The NST comprised four professionals (physicians, full-time nurses, full-time pharmacists, and full-time clinical dietitians). Patients admitted to ICUs with and without the NST system were allocated to the NST and non-NST groups, respectively.

Results: The analysis comprised a total of 15,555 patients with ARDS. Among them, 6615 (42.5%) were in the NST group, and 8940 (57.5%) were in the non-NST group. After adjusting for covariates in the multivariable logistic regression, the NST group showed a 19% lower 30-day mortality than the non-NST group (odds ratio: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.87, p < .001). Furthermore, after adjusting for covariates in multivariable Cox regression, the NST group showed a 12% lower 1-year all-cause mortality than the non-NST group (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.92, p < .001).

Conclusions: NST implementation was associated with enhanced 30-day and 1-year survival rates in patients with ARDS. These findings indicate that nutritional support provided by the NST may influence the survival outcomes of patients with ARDS in the ICU.

多学科营养支持团队与急性呼吸窘迫综合征重症患者的死亡率。
背景:为急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者提供营养支持时需要采取谨慎的方法。本研究探讨了实施多学科营养支持团队(NST)是否与改善 ARDS 患者的生存预后有关:在一项基于全国人口的队列研究中,纳入了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日入住韩国重症监护病房(ICU)、主要诊断为 ARDS 的所有成年患者。NST 由四名专业人员(医生、专职护士、专职药剂师和专职临床营养师)组成。有 NST 系统和没有 NST 系统的重症监护病房收治的患者分别被分配到 NST 组和非 NST 组:分析对象包括 15555 名 ARDS 患者。其中,NST组有6615人(42.5%),非NST组有8940人(57.5%)。在多变量逻辑回归中对协变量进行调整后,NST 组的 30 天死亡率比非 NST 组低 19%(几率比:0.81,95% 置信区间:0.75-0.87,P 结论:NST 的实施与提高 30 天死亡率相关:实施 NST 可提高 ARDS 患者的 30 天和 1 年生存率。这些研究结果表明,NST 提供的营养支持可能会影响重症监护室 ARDS 患者的生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信