Microbial Metabolomics' Latest SICRIT: Soft Ionization by Chemical Reaction In-Transfer Mass Spectrometry.

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Allyson McAtamney, Allison Ferranti, Denise A Ludvik, Fitnat H Yildiz, Mark J Mandel, Taylor Hayward, Laura M Sanchez
{"title":"Microbial Metabolomics' Latest SICRIT: Soft Ionization by Chemical Reaction In-Transfer Mass Spectrometry.","authors":"Allyson McAtamney, Allison Ferranti, Denise A Ludvik, Fitnat H Yildiz, Mark J Mandel, Taylor Hayward, Laura M Sanchez","doi":"10.1021/jasms.4c00309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microbial metabolomics studies are a common approach for identifying microbial strains that have a capacity to produce new chemistries both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in situ</i>. A limitation to applying microbial metabolomics to the discovery of new chemical entities is the rediscovery of known compounds, or \"known unknowns.\" One factor contributing to this rediscovery is that the majority of laboratories use one ionization source─electrospray ionization (ESI)─to conduct metabolomics studies. Although ESI is an efficient, widely adopted ionization method, its widespread use may contribute to the reidentification of known metabolites. Here, we present the use of a dielectric barrier discharge ionization (DBDI) for microbial metabolomics applications through the use of soft ionization chemical reaction in-transfer (SICRIT). Additionally, we compared SICRIT to ESI using two different <i>Vibrio</i> species: <i>Vibrio fischeri</i>, a symbiotic marine bacterium, and <i>Vibrio cholerae</i>, a pathogenic bacterium. Overall, we found that the SICRIT source ionizes a different set of metabolites than ESI, and it has the ability to ionize lipids more efficiently than ESI in the positive mode. This work highlights the value of using more than one ionization source for the detection of metabolites.</p>","PeriodicalId":672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.4c00309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbial metabolomics studies are a common approach for identifying microbial strains that have a capacity to produce new chemistries both in vitro and in situ. A limitation to applying microbial metabolomics to the discovery of new chemical entities is the rediscovery of known compounds, or "known unknowns." One factor contributing to this rediscovery is that the majority of laboratories use one ionization source─electrospray ionization (ESI)─to conduct metabolomics studies. Although ESI is an efficient, widely adopted ionization method, its widespread use may contribute to the reidentification of known metabolites. Here, we present the use of a dielectric barrier discharge ionization (DBDI) for microbial metabolomics applications through the use of soft ionization chemical reaction in-transfer (SICRIT). Additionally, we compared SICRIT to ESI using two different Vibrio species: Vibrio fischeri, a symbiotic marine bacterium, and Vibrio cholerae, a pathogenic bacterium. Overall, we found that the SICRIT source ionizes a different set of metabolites than ESI, and it has the ability to ionize lipids more efficiently than ESI in the positive mode. This work highlights the value of using more than one ionization source for the detection of metabolites.

微生物代谢组学最新的 SICRIT:化学反应内转移软电离质谱法。
微生物代谢组学研究是一种常见的方法,用于鉴定具有体外和原位产生新化学物质能力的微生物菌株。应用微生物代谢组学发现新化学实体的一个限制因素是重新发现已知化合物或 "已知未知物"。导致这种重新发现的一个因素是,大多数实验室使用一种电离源--电喷雾电离(ESI)--来进行代谢组学研究。尽管电喷雾离子化是一种高效且被广泛采用的离子化方法,但它的广泛使用可能会导致已知代谢物的重新鉴定。在这里,我们介绍了通过使用软电离化学反应内转移(SICRIT)将介质阻挡放电离子化(DBDI)应用于微生物代谢组学研究。此外,我们还使用两种不同的弧菌对 SICRIT 和 ESI 进行了比较:它们分别是海洋共生弧菌费舍里弧菌和致病弧菌霍乱弧菌。总之,我们发现 SICRIT 源电离出的代谢物与 ESI 不同,在正离子模式下,它电离脂质的效率高于 ESI。这项工作凸显了使用一种以上电离源检测代谢物的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry presents research papers covering all aspects of mass spectrometry, incorporating coverage of fields of scientific inquiry in which mass spectrometry can play a role. Comprehensive in scope, the journal publishes papers on both fundamentals and applications of mass spectrometry. Fundamental subjects include instrumentation principles, design, and demonstration, structures and chemical properties of gas-phase ions, studies of thermodynamic properties, ion spectroscopy, chemical kinetics, mechanisms of ionization, theories of ion fragmentation, cluster ions, and potential energy surfaces. In addition to full papers, the journal offers Communications, Application Notes, and Accounts and Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信