What over the counter (OTC) products have been evaluated for anxiety in adults aged 18-60? A scoping review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rachael Frost, Sayem Uddin, Silvy Mathew, Verity Thomas, Adriana Salame, Sukvinder Kaur Bhamra, Juan Carlos Bazo-Alvarez, Cini Bhanu, Michael Heinrich, Kate Walters
{"title":"What over the counter (OTC) products have been evaluated for anxiety in adults aged 18-60? A scoping review.","authors":"Rachael Frost, Sayem Uddin, Silvy Mathew, Verity Thomas, Adriana Salame, Sukvinder Kaur Bhamra, Juan Carlos Bazo-Alvarez, Cini Bhanu, Michael Heinrich, Kate Walters","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2024.2408231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety symptoms and disorders are common in the UK. Whilst waiting for, or alongside, treatments such as anxiolytics or psychological therapies, people often self-manage anxiety symptoms with products purchased over-the-counter (OTC), such as herbal medicines or dietary supplements. However, the evidence for these products is often presented across different reviews and is not easy for patients or healthcare professionals to compare and understand.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the nature and size of the evidence base available for these products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and AMED (inception-Dec 2022) were searched for RCTs assessing OTC products in people aged 18-60 with symptoms or a diagnosis of anxiety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 69 papers assessing a range of products were found, which mostly focussed on kava, lavender, saffron, probiotics, Galphimia glauca and valerian. Studies used varying dosages. Compared to herbal medicine studies, there were much fewer dietary supplement studies and homeopathic remedy studies, despite some of use of these by the general public.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research needs to investigate commonly used but less evaluated products (e.g. chamomile, St John's Wort) and to evaluate products against or alongside conventional treatments to better reflect patient decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2408231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety symptoms and disorders are common in the UK. Whilst waiting for, or alongside, treatments such as anxiolytics or psychological therapies, people often self-manage anxiety symptoms with products purchased over-the-counter (OTC), such as herbal medicines or dietary supplements. However, the evidence for these products is often presented across different reviews and is not easy for patients or healthcare professionals to compare and understand.

Aims: To determine the nature and size of the evidence base available for these products.

Methods: A scoping review. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and AMED (inception-Dec 2022) were searched for RCTs assessing OTC products in people aged 18-60 with symptoms or a diagnosis of anxiety.

Results: In total 69 papers assessing a range of products were found, which mostly focussed on kava, lavender, saffron, probiotics, Galphimia glauca and valerian. Studies used varying dosages. Compared to herbal medicine studies, there were much fewer dietary supplement studies and homeopathic remedy studies, despite some of use of these by the general public.

Conclusion: Future research needs to investigate commonly used but less evaluated products (e.g. chamomile, St John's Wort) and to evaluate products against or alongside conventional treatments to better reflect patient decision making.

对哪些非处方药(OTC)产品针对 18-60 岁成年人的焦虑症进行过评估?范围综述。
背景:焦虑症状和焦虑症在英国很常见。在等待抗焦虑药或心理疗法等治疗的同时,人们通常会使用草药或膳食补充剂等非处方药(OTC)产品来自我控制焦虑症状。然而,这些产品的证据往往在不同的综述中出现,患者或医护人员不易比较和理解。目的:确定这些产品现有证据基础的性质和规模:方法:范围综述。检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycInfo 和 AMED(截止至 2022 年)中对有焦虑症状或诊断的 18-60 岁人群使用非处方药产品进行评估的 RCT:结果:共找到 69 篇论文,对一系列产品进行了评估,主要集中在卡瓦、薰衣草、藏红花、益生菌、Galphimia glauca 和缬草。这些研究使用了不同的剂量。与草药研究相比,膳食补充剂研究和顺势疗法研究的数量要少得多,尽管普通公众也使用一些此类药物:未来的研究需要对常用但评估较少的产品(如甘菊、圣约翰草)进行调查,并对照常规疗法或与常规疗法一起对产品进行评估,以更好地反映患者的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信