Procedural characteristics of coronary angiography in patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael Yang, Grace C Bloomfield, Brian C Case, Lowell F Satler, Ron Waksman, Itsik Ben-Dor
{"title":"Procedural characteristics of coronary angiography in patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.","authors":"Michael Yang, Grace C Bloomfield, Brian C Case, Lowell F Satler, Ron Waksman, Itsik Ben-Dor","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anomalous coronary arteries (ACA) are seen in 1-5 % of patients undergoing coronary angiography, and their presence may increase procedural difficulty. We aimed to compare procedural outcomes of coronary angiography in ACA patients by anatomy and prior knowledge of the ACA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center review of ACA patients undergoing coronary angiography between October 2013 and February 2022. Primary endpoints were contrast volume, fluoroscopy dose, time, and dose-area product (DAP). Comparisons were made between groups based on ACA anatomy and based on prior knowledge of the ACA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 176 diagnostic coronary angiograms among ACA patients. Anomalies of the right coronary artery (RCA) comprised 77 %, followed by left circumflex (LCX) at 16 % and left main or left anterior descending (LMCA/LAD) at 7 %. There was significantly more contrast use among patients with RCA (mean 110.5 mL) or LMCA/LAD (115.6 mL) anomalies than LCX (76.2 mL; p = 0.01). There was no difference in fluoroscopy dose, time, or DAP. Prior knowledge of the anomaly was recorded in 61 (35 %) cases. Contrast volume (mean difference 27.1 mL, 95 % confidence interval: 12.5-41.8) and all fluoroscopy measures decreased if the ACA was previously known to the operators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different types of ACAs are associated with increased contrast use but not fluoroscopy exposure. Prior knowledge of ACA is associated with decreased contrast use and fluoroscopy exposure. Thorough review of prior catheterizations and knowledge of catheter selection is important for reducing contrast use and fluoroscopy exposure in patients with ACA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anomalous coronary arteries (ACA) are seen in 1-5 % of patients undergoing coronary angiography, and their presence may increase procedural difficulty. We aimed to compare procedural outcomes of coronary angiography in ACA patients by anatomy and prior knowledge of the ACA.

Methods: This was a single-center review of ACA patients undergoing coronary angiography between October 2013 and February 2022. Primary endpoints were contrast volume, fluoroscopy dose, time, and dose-area product (DAP). Comparisons were made between groups based on ACA anatomy and based on prior knowledge of the ACA.

Results: We found 176 diagnostic coronary angiograms among ACA patients. Anomalies of the right coronary artery (RCA) comprised 77 %, followed by left circumflex (LCX) at 16 % and left main or left anterior descending (LMCA/LAD) at 7 %. There was significantly more contrast use among patients with RCA (mean 110.5 mL) or LMCA/LAD (115.6 mL) anomalies than LCX (76.2 mL; p = 0.01). There was no difference in fluoroscopy dose, time, or DAP. Prior knowledge of the anomaly was recorded in 61 (35 %) cases. Contrast volume (mean difference 27.1 mL, 95 % confidence interval: 12.5-41.8) and all fluoroscopy measures decreased if the ACA was previously known to the operators.

Conclusion: Different types of ACAs are associated with increased contrast use but not fluoroscopy exposure. Prior knowledge of ACA is associated with decreased contrast use and fluoroscopy exposure. Thorough review of prior catheterizations and knowledge of catheter selection is important for reducing contrast use and fluoroscopy exposure in patients with ACA.

冠状动脉主动脉起源异常患者冠状动脉造影的程序特点。
背景:在接受冠状动脉造影术的患者中,1%-5%的患者存在异常冠状动脉(ACA),而异常冠状动脉的存在可能会增加手术难度。我们的目的是根据解剖结构和先前对 ACA 的了解,比较 ACA 患者冠状动脉造影术的疗效:这是一项对 2013 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月期间接受冠状动脉造影术的 ACA 患者进行的单中心回顾性研究。主要终点是对比剂用量、透视剂量、时间和剂量-面积乘积(DAP)。根据冠状动脉解剖结构和事先对冠状动脉的了解情况进行组间比较:我们在 ACA 患者中发现了 176 例诊断性冠状动脉造影。右冠状动脉 (RCA) 异常占 77%,其次是左侧环状动脉 (LCX),占 16%,左主干或左前降支 (LMCA/LAD) 异常占 7%。RCA(平均 110.5 毫升)或 LMCA/LAD (115.6 毫升)异常患者使用的造影剂明显多于 LCX(76.2 毫升;P = 0.01)。透视剂量、时间或 DAP 均无差异。有 61 例(35%)患者事先知道异常。如果操作者之前就知道 ACA,则对比剂用量(平均差异为 27.1 毫升,95% 置信区间:12.5-41.8)和所有透视测量值都会减少:结论:不同类型的ACA与造影剂用量增加有关,但与透视暴露无关。结论:不同类型的 ACA 与造影剂用量增加有关,但与透视暴露无关;事先了解 ACA 与造影剂用量和透视暴露减少有关。彻底审查之前的导管检查并了解导管的选择对于减少ACA患者的造影剂使用和透视暴露非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信