Discordant cardiac inflammation between 18F-FDG PET and CMR in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

Erika Hutt, Maria P Vega Brizneda, Christine L Jellis, Manuel L Ribeiro Neto, Wael A Jaber, Paul C Cremer
{"title":"Discordant cardiac inflammation between <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and CMR in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.","authors":"Erika Hutt, Maria P Vega Brizneda, Christine L Jellis, Manuel L Ribeiro Neto, Wael A Jaber, Paul C Cremer","doi":"10.1186/s41824-024-00218-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) rely on non-invasive imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET-CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of discordant myocardial inflammation between PET-CT and CMR in patients with known cardiac sarcoidosis. We retrospectively identified patients with both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET-CT and CMR who had histology-proven sarcoidosis (N = 148). Among these 25 (17%) had abnormal <sup>18</sup>F-FDG metabolism with normal tissue characterization by CMR. Of these, 13 (9%) had the studies concomitantly within 180 days (median 5 days, IQR 1-31). During median follow up of 7 years, 3 (23%) deaths were documented. Although prospective studies are required to address the best imaging approach for cardiac inflammation, our observation that some patients with CS have evidence of disease activity on PET-CT, but not on limited CMR without mapping suggests that a negative limited CMR may not fully exclude CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":519909,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI reports","volume":"8 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-024-00218-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) rely on non-invasive imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET-CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of discordant myocardial inflammation between PET-CT and CMR in patients with known cardiac sarcoidosis. We retrospectively identified patients with both 18F-FDG PET-CT and CMR who had histology-proven sarcoidosis (N = 148). Among these 25 (17%) had abnormal 18F-FDG metabolism with normal tissue characterization by CMR. Of these, 13 (9%) had the studies concomitantly within 180 days (median 5 days, IQR 1-31). During median follow up of 7 years, 3 (23%) deaths were documented. Although prospective studies are required to address the best imaging approach for cardiac inflammation, our observation that some patients with CS have evidence of disease activity on PET-CT, but not on limited CMR without mapping suggests that a negative limited CMR may not fully exclude CS.

心脏肉样瘤病患者的 18F-FDG PET 与 CMR 之间的心脏炎症不一致。
目前心脏肉样瘤病(CS)的诊断标准依赖于非侵入性成像工具,包括正电子发射断层扫描(PET-CT)和心脏磁共振(CMR)。本研究旨在评估已知心脏肉样瘤病患者 PET-CT 和 CMR 心肌炎症不一致的发生率。我们回顾性地确定了组织学证实患有肉样瘤病的 18F-FDG PET-CT 和 CMR 患者(148 人)。其中 25 人(17%)18F-FDG 代谢异常,但 CMR 组织特征正常。其中,13 人(9%)在 180 天内(中位数为 5 天,IQR 为 1-31)同时进行了研究。在 7 年的中位随访期间,记录了 3 例(23%)死亡病例。尽管需要进行前瞻性研究才能确定治疗心脏炎症的最佳成像方法,但我们观察到一些 CS 患者在 PET-CT 上有疾病活动的证据,而在不进行造影的有限 CMR 上却没有,这表明有限 CMR 阴性可能并不能完全排除 CS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信