Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.

Stephanie Tierney, Geoffrey Wong, Debra Westlake, Amadea Turk, Steven Markham, Jordan Gorenberg, Joanne Reeve, Caroline Mitchell, Kerryn Husk, Sabi Redwood, Tony Meacock, Catherine Pope, Beccy Baird, Kamal R Mahtani
{"title":"Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.","authors":"Stephanie Tierney, Geoffrey Wong, Debra Westlake, Amadea Turk, Steven Markham, Jordan Gorenberg, Joanne Reeve, Caroline Mitchell, Kerryn Husk, Sabi Redwood, Tony Meacock, Catherine Pope, Beccy Baird, Kamal R Mahtani","doi":"10.3310/ETND8254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social prescribing link workers have become part of primary health care in recent years. They help patients to recognise non-medical factors affecting their health and identify sources of support, often in the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector. They form part of wider work to strengthen person-centred care, which actively seeks to engage individuals in decision-making about their health, taking into account their medical, social, psychological, financial and spiritual circumstances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how buy-in to social prescribing and the link worker role is established for a patient, and how this relates to person-centred care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A realist evaluation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients engaging with link workers in seven different parts of England were involved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of data collection, we observed link workers interacting with 35 patients. We also interviewed 61 patients and re-interviewed 41 of them 9-12 months later. Data were coded and developed into context-mechanism-outcome configurations, which were used to produce a programme theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data highlighted how patients might be uncertain about the link worker role but agree to a referral as they sought assistance with their non-medical issues. Patients talked about experiencing a sense of hope through the trust they developed in a link worker. This trust was established through the communication skills and knowledge demonstrated by a link worker, and by their ability to act as an anchor point when required - a reliable, consistent source of support to whom patients could offload. The link worker role also involved connecting patients to external support, which called for sensitivity around how ready someone was to move forward; this was shaped by a patient's motivation but also their capacity to make changes given other demands in their life. Connecting patients to external support could be affected by structural factors outside the link workers' control (e.g. housing options or employment opportunities).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>We did not interview patients who had rejected the offer of social prescribing, and most had a positive view of meeting with a link worker.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Person-centred care is engendered by link workers through their skills, knowledge and ability to respond to the individual readiness of patients to engage with external support. It can be curtailed by structural factors outside link workers' sphere of control, such as access to housing or caring responsibilities of patients. This can hinder patients' ability to 'connect to', leaving link workers to continue 'connecting with' patients as they act as an anchor point.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Exploration is required of factors affecting patients who interact with a link worker but do not access external support. Longitudinal work with a cohort of patients, speaking to them on a regular basis, may provide further understanding in this respect.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR130247.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/ETND8254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social prescribing link workers have become part of primary health care in recent years. They help patients to recognise non-medical factors affecting their health and identify sources of support, often in the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector. They form part of wider work to strengthen person-centred care, which actively seeks to engage individuals in decision-making about their health, taking into account their medical, social, psychological, financial and spiritual circumstances.

Objective: To understand how buy-in to social prescribing and the link worker role is established for a patient, and how this relates to person-centred care.

Design: A realist evaluation.

Setting: Patients engaging with link workers in seven different parts of England were involved.

Methods: As part of data collection, we observed link workers interacting with 35 patients. We also interviewed 61 patients and re-interviewed 41 of them 9-12 months later. Data were coded and developed into context-mechanism-outcome configurations, which were used to produce a programme theory.

Results: Data highlighted how patients might be uncertain about the link worker role but agree to a referral as they sought assistance with their non-medical issues. Patients talked about experiencing a sense of hope through the trust they developed in a link worker. This trust was established through the communication skills and knowledge demonstrated by a link worker, and by their ability to act as an anchor point when required - a reliable, consistent source of support to whom patients could offload. The link worker role also involved connecting patients to external support, which called for sensitivity around how ready someone was to move forward; this was shaped by a patient's motivation but also their capacity to make changes given other demands in their life. Connecting patients to external support could be affected by structural factors outside the link workers' control (e.g. housing options or employment opportunities).

Limitations: We did not interview patients who had rejected the offer of social prescribing, and most had a positive view of meeting with a link worker.

Conclusions: Person-centred care is engendered by link workers through their skills, knowledge and ability to respond to the individual readiness of patients to engage with external support. It can be curtailed by structural factors outside link workers' sphere of control, such as access to housing or caring responsibilities of patients. This can hinder patients' ability to 'connect to', leaving link workers to continue 'connecting with' patients as they act as an anchor point.

Future work: Exploration is required of factors affecting patients who interact with a link worker but do not access external support. Longitudinal work with a cohort of patients, speaking to them on a regular basis, may provide further understanding in this respect.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR130247.

作为以人为本的护理的一部分,病人通过联系工作者接受社会处方:现实主义评估。
背景:近年来,社会处方联系工作者已成为初级医疗保健的一部分。他们帮助病人认识到影响其健康的非医疗因素,并确定支持来源,通常是志愿、社区和社会企业部门。他们是加强以人为本的护理工作的一部分,这种护理积极寻求让个人参与有关其健康的决策,同时考虑到他们的医疗、社会、心理、经济和精神状况:目的:了解患者如何接受社会处方和联系工作者的角色,以及这与以人为本的护理之间的关系:设计:现实主义评估:方法:作为数据收集工作的一部分,我们观察了在英格兰七个不同地区与联系工作者合作的患者:作为数据收集的一部分,我们观察了联系工作者与 35 名患者的互动。我们还采访了 61 名患者,并在 9-12 个月后再次采访了其中的 41 人。我们对数据进行了编码,并将其发展为 "背景-机制-结果 "的组合,从而形成了一个计划理论:结果:数据强调了患者如何可能对联系工作者的角色不确定,但在寻求非医疗问题的帮助时同意转介。患者谈到,他们通过对联系工作者的信任而感受到了希望。这种信任是通过联系工作者所展示的沟通技巧和知识,以及他们在需要时充当锚点的能力而建立起来的--这是一个可靠、稳定的支持来源,患者可以向其寻求帮助。联系工作者的职责还包括将患者与外部支持联系起来,这就要求对患者是否做好了向前迈进的准备具有敏感性;这取决于患者的动机,也取决于他们是否有能力根据生活中的其他需求做出改变。将患者与外部支持联系起来可能会受到链接工作者无法控制的结构性因素(如住房选择或就业机会)的影响:我们没有采访拒绝接受社会处方服务的患者,大多数患者对与联系工作者会面持积极态度:结论:联系工作者通过他们的技能、知识和能力对患者参与外部支持的个人意愿做出反应,从而提供以人为本的护理。但联系工作者控制范围之外的结构性因素,如住房或病人的护理责任,可能会限制这种护理。这可能会阻碍病人 "与外界联系 "的能力,使联系工作者不得不继续 "与病人联系",因为他们是病人的锚点:未来的工作:需要探索影响那些与联系工作者互动但没有获得外部支持的患者的因素。对一组患者进行纵向研究,定期与他们交谈,可以进一步了解这方面的情况:本文为独立研究,由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康与社会护理服务研究项目资助,奖励编号为NIHR130247。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信