Cross-site Validation of AI Segmentation and Harmonization in Breast MRI.

Yu Huang, Nicholas J Leotta, Lukas Hirsch, Roberto Lo Gullo, Mary Hughes, Jeffrey Reiner, Nicole B Saphier, Kelly S Myers, Babita Panigrahi, Emily Ambinder, Philip Di Carlo, Lars J Grimm, Dorothy Lowell, Sora Yoon, Sujata V Ghate, Lucas C Parra, Elizabeth J Sutton
{"title":"Cross-site Validation of AI Segmentation and Harmonization in Breast MRI.","authors":"Yu Huang, Nicholas J Leotta, Lukas Hirsch, Roberto Lo Gullo, Mary Hughes, Jeffrey Reiner, Nicole B Saphier, Kelly S Myers, Babita Panigrahi, Emily Ambinder, Philip Di Carlo, Lars J Grimm, Dorothy Lowell, Sora Yoon, Sujata V Ghate, Lucas C Parra, Elizabeth J Sutton","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01266-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This work aims to perform a cross-site validation of automated segmentation for breast cancers in MRI and to compare the performance to radiologists. A three-dimensional (3D) U-Net was trained to segment cancers in dynamic contrast-enhanced axial MRIs using a large dataset from Site 1 (n = 15,266; 449 malignant and 14,817 benign). Performance was validated on site-specific test data from this and two additional sites, and common publicly available testing data. Four radiologists from each of the three clinical sites provided two-dimensional (2D) segmentations as ground truth. Segmentation performance did not differ between the network and radiologists on the test data from Sites 1 and 2 or the common public data (median Dice score Site 1, network 0.86 vs. radiologist 0.85, n = 114; Site 2, 0.91 vs. 0.91, n = 50; common: 0.93 vs. 0.90). For Site 3, an affine input layer was fine-tuned using segmentation labels, resulting in comparable performance between the network and radiologist (0.88 vs. 0.89, n = 42). Radiologist performance differed on the common test data, and the network numerically outperformed 11 of the 12 radiologists (median Dice: 0.85-0.94, n = 20). In conclusion, a deep network with a novel supervised harmonization technique matches radiologists' performance in MRI tumor segmentation across clinical sites. We make code and weights publicly available to promote reproducible AI in radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01266-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aims to perform a cross-site validation of automated segmentation for breast cancers in MRI and to compare the performance to radiologists. A three-dimensional (3D) U-Net was trained to segment cancers in dynamic contrast-enhanced axial MRIs using a large dataset from Site 1 (n = 15,266; 449 malignant and 14,817 benign). Performance was validated on site-specific test data from this and two additional sites, and common publicly available testing data. Four radiologists from each of the three clinical sites provided two-dimensional (2D) segmentations as ground truth. Segmentation performance did not differ between the network and radiologists on the test data from Sites 1 and 2 or the common public data (median Dice score Site 1, network 0.86 vs. radiologist 0.85, n = 114; Site 2, 0.91 vs. 0.91, n = 50; common: 0.93 vs. 0.90). For Site 3, an affine input layer was fine-tuned using segmentation labels, resulting in comparable performance between the network and radiologist (0.88 vs. 0.89, n = 42). Radiologist performance differed on the common test data, and the network numerically outperformed 11 of the 12 radiologists (median Dice: 0.85-0.94, n = 20). In conclusion, a deep network with a novel supervised harmonization technique matches radiologists' performance in MRI tumor segmentation across clinical sites. We make code and weights publicly available to promote reproducible AI in radiology.

乳腺 MRI 中人工智能分段和协调的跨站点验证。
这项工作旨在对核磁共振成像中的乳腺癌自动分割进行跨站点验证,并将其性能与放射科医生进行比较。利用第一站点的大型数据集(n = 15,266; 449 个恶性肿瘤和 14,817 个良性肿瘤)对三维 U-Net 进行了训练,以分割动态对比增强轴向 MRI 中的癌症。在该站点和另外两个站点的特定测试数据以及常见的公开测试数据上对性能进行了验证。三个临床站点的四位放射科医生分别提供了二维(2D)分割结果作为基本事实。在 1 号和 2 号站点的测试数据或通用公共数据上,网络和放射科医生的分割性能没有差异(中位数 Dice 分数 1 号站点,网络 0.86 vs. 放射科医生 0.85,n = 114;2 号站点,0.91 vs. 0.91,n = 50;通用:0.93 vs. 0.90)。对于第 3 个部位,使用分割标签对仿射输入层进行了微调,结果网络和放射科医生的表现相当(0.88 vs. 0.89,n = 42)。放射科医生在共同测试数据上的表现各不相同,网络在数值上优于 12 位放射科医生中的 11 位(Dice 中位数:0.85-0.94,n = 20)。总之,采用新型监督协调技术的深度网络与放射科医生在不同临床部位的核磁共振肿瘤分割中的表现相匹配。我们公开了代码和权重,以促进放射学中人工智能的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信