"Before medically advised" hospital discharge and the risk of subsequent drug overdose: A case-crossover analysis.

John A Staples, Xiao Hu, Mayesha Khan, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Hiten Naik, Benjamin M Kaasa, Jeffrey R Brubacher, Trudy Nasmith, Jennifer R Lyden, Jessica Moe, Alexis Crabtree, Amanda Slaunwhite
{"title":"\"Before medically advised\" hospital discharge and the risk of subsequent drug overdose: A case-crossover analysis.","authors":"John A Staples, Xiao Hu, Mayesha Khan, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Hiten Naik, Benjamin M Kaasa, Jeffrey R Brubacher, Trudy Nasmith, Jennifer R Lyden, Jessica Moe, Alexis Crabtree, Amanda Slaunwhite","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-initiated or \"before medically advised\" (BMA) hospital discharge is more common among people who use drugs. Transitions of care can be destabilizing and might increase the risk of subsequent illicit drug overdose.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to evaluate whether BMA discharge is associated with an increased risk of subsequent drug overdose (primary objective) and whether physician-advised discharge is associated with an increased risk of subsequent drug overdose (secondary objective).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a case-crossover analysis of population-based linked administrative health data for individuals experiencing an overdose between 2016 and 2019 in British Columbia, Canada. Using conditional logistic regression, we compared the likelihood of hospital discharge in the 28 days before overdose (the \"pre-overdose interval\") to the likelihood of hospital discharge in two self-matched 28-day control intervals ending 26 and 52 weeks before overdose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 3.5-year study interval, 235 of 27,584 (0.9%) pre-overdose intervals and 189 of 55,168 (0.3%) control intervals included a BMA discharge, suggesting that BMA discharge was associated with a twofold increase in the risk of subsequent drug overdose (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.68-2.58; p < 0.001). Physician-advised hospital discharge was also a risk factor for subsequent overdose, occurring in 1350 of 27,584 (4.9%) pre-overdose intervals and 1625 of 55,168 (2.9%) control intervals (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52; p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both BMA and physician-advised hospital discharge are independently associated with transient increases in the risk of subsequent illicit drug overdose. Better in-hospital treatment of substance use disorder and novel means of post-discharge outreach should be deployed to reduce this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-initiated or "before medically advised" (BMA) hospital discharge is more common among people who use drugs. Transitions of care can be destabilizing and might increase the risk of subsequent illicit drug overdose.

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate whether BMA discharge is associated with an increased risk of subsequent drug overdose (primary objective) and whether physician-advised discharge is associated with an increased risk of subsequent drug overdose (secondary objective).

Methods: We performed a case-crossover analysis of population-based linked administrative health data for individuals experiencing an overdose between 2016 and 2019 in British Columbia, Canada. Using conditional logistic regression, we compared the likelihood of hospital discharge in the 28 days before overdose (the "pre-overdose interval") to the likelihood of hospital discharge in two self-matched 28-day control intervals ending 26 and 52 weeks before overdose.

Results: Over the 3.5-year study interval, 235 of 27,584 (0.9%) pre-overdose intervals and 189 of 55,168 (0.3%) control intervals included a BMA discharge, suggesting that BMA discharge was associated with a twofold increase in the risk of subsequent drug overdose (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.68-2.58; p < 0.001). Physician-advised hospital discharge was also a risk factor for subsequent overdose, occurring in 1350 of 27,584 (4.9%) pre-overdose intervals and 1625 of 55,168 (2.9%) control intervals (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52; p < .001).

Conclusions: Both BMA and physician-advised hospital discharge are independently associated with transient increases in the risk of subsequent illicit drug overdose. Better in-hospital treatment of substance use disorder and novel means of post-discharge outreach should be deployed to reduce this risk.

"医学建议 "出院前与随后药物过量的风险:病例交叉分析。
背景:患者主动或 "在医学建议之前"(BMA)出院在吸毒者中更为常见。护理过渡可能会破坏稳定,并可能增加后续非法药物过量的风险:本研究旨在评估 "BMA "出院是否与后续药物过量风险增加有关(首要目标),以及 "医生建议 "出院是否与后续药物过量风险增加有关(次要目标):我们对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省 2016 年至 2019 年期间发生用药过量的人群相关行政健康数据进行了病例交叉分析。通过条件逻辑回归,我们比较了用药过量前 28 天("用药过量前区间")的出院可能性与用药过量前 26 周和 52 周的两个自我匹配 28 天对照区间的出院可能性:在为期 3.5 年的研究中,27,584 个用药前间隔期中的 235 个(0.9%)和 55,168 个对照间隔期中的 189 个(0.3%)包含了 BMA 出院,这表明 BMA 出院与随后用药过量风险增加两倍有关(调整赔率 [aOR],2.08;95% 置信区间 [95%CI],1.68-2.58;P 结论:BMA 和医生建议的出院都会增加用药过量风险:BMA和医生建议出院都与随后非法药物过量风险的短暂增加有独立关联。应采取更好的院内药物使用障碍治疗和新颖的出院后宣传手段来降低这一风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信