Blood-sparing techniques prevalence in adult intensive care units: A multicentre survey study

M. Raurell-Torredà , R.-J. Fernández-Castillo , M.-E. Rodríguez-Delgado , Á. Cobos-Vargas , D.-M. Achury-Saldaña , E. Cavallo , A. Muriel-García , S. Arias-Rivera
{"title":"Blood-sparing techniques prevalence in adult intensive care units: A multicentre survey study","authors":"M. Raurell-Torredà ,&nbsp;R.-J. Fernández-Castillo ,&nbsp;M.-E. Rodríguez-Delgado ,&nbsp;Á. Cobos-Vargas ,&nbsp;D.-M. Achury-Saldaña ,&nbsp;E. Cavallo ,&nbsp;A. Muriel-García ,&nbsp;S. Arias-Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Anaemia is a common condition in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is also well known that a significant amount of the carbon dioxide produced by health services is likely attributable to blood donation, testing, and the manufacture, storage, and distribution of blood components. To mitigate this, prevention strategies such as blood-sparing techniques are available. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the use of such techniques in ICUs in Spain and Latin America, healthcare systems with very different health expenditures per capita. The aim is to assess the degree of implementation of blood-sparing techniques in these regions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional online multicentre survey. 251 ICUs in Spain and 53 in Latin America (20 in Argentina, 20 in Colombia, 13 in Ecuador) participated. A 20-item survey on the use of point-of-care, small-volume tubes (SVT), and closed-blood sampling devices (CBSD) was validated. Effect sizes were calculated using Phi (φ) or Cramer’s V (V).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A response rate of 77% was obtained for Spain and 96% for Latin America. In Spain, the majority of ICUs were affiliated with public hospitals (88.1%, 171/194) while in Latin America, most were associated with private hospitals (56.9%, 29/51). Regarding the use of point-of-care testing, 67.5% of Spanish ICUs, compared to 35.3% of Latin Americans, reported frequent use (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.343). In 91.7% of Spanish ICUs and 58.9% of Latin Americans, SVTs were rarely or never used (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.380). The use of CBSD was significantly lower in Spain for both arterial and central venous catheters (<em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.336). Private hospitals used more CBSD in arterial catheter than public ones (27% vs 8.3%, <em>V</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.278).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Point-of-care testing can be improved in Latin America, while the use of CBSD and small-volume tubes can be enhanced in Spain. Private hospitals tend to implement blood-sparing techniques more effectively than public hospitals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"35 4","pages":"Pages 340-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984024000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Anaemia is a common condition in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). It is also well known that a significant amount of the carbon dioxide produced by health services is likely attributable to blood donation, testing, and the manufacture, storage, and distribution of blood components. To mitigate this, prevention strategies such as blood-sparing techniques are available. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the use of such techniques in ICUs in Spain and Latin America, healthcare systems with very different health expenditures per capita. The aim is to assess the degree of implementation of blood-sparing techniques in these regions.

Methods

Cross-sectional online multicentre survey. 251 ICUs in Spain and 53 in Latin America (20 in Argentina, 20 in Colombia, 13 in Ecuador) participated. A 20-item survey on the use of point-of-care, small-volume tubes (SVT), and closed-blood sampling devices (CBSD) was validated. Effect sizes were calculated using Phi (φ) or Cramer’s V (V).

Results

A response rate of 77% was obtained for Spain and 96% for Latin America. In Spain, the majority of ICUs were affiliated with public hospitals (88.1%, 171/194) while in Latin America, most were associated with private hospitals (56.9%, 29/51). Regarding the use of point-of-care testing, 67.5% of Spanish ICUs, compared to 35.3% of Latin Americans, reported frequent use (V = 0.343). In 91.7% of Spanish ICUs and 58.9% of Latin Americans, SVTs were rarely or never used (V = 0.380). The use of CBSD was significantly lower in Spain for both arterial and central venous catheters (V = 0.336). Private hospitals used more CBSD in arterial catheter than public ones (27% vs 8.3%, V = 0.278).

Conclusion

Point-of-care testing can be improved in Latin America, while the use of CBSD and small-volume tubes can be enhanced in Spain. Private hospitals tend to implement blood-sparing techniques more effectively than public hospitals.
成人重症监护病房的血液保留技术普及率:一项多中心调查研究。
简介贫血是重症监护病房(ICU)病人的常见病。众所周知,医疗服务产生的大量二氧化碳很可能来自献血、检验以及血液成分的制造、储存和分配。为了减少二氧化碳的产生,可以采取一些预防策略,如节约血液的技术。西班牙和拉丁美洲的人均医疗支出体系大相径庭,而在这两个地区的重症监护室中使用此类技术的情况却不尽相同。我们的目的是评估这些地区实施保血技术的程度:方法:横断面在线多中心调查。西班牙的 251 家重症监护室和拉丁美洲的 53 家重症监护室(阿根廷 20 家、哥伦比亚 20 家、厄瓜多尔 13 家)参加了调查。对使用护理点、小容量管(SVT)和闭合血液采样装置(CBSD)的情况进行了 20 个项目的调查验证。效果大小用 Phi (φ) 或 Cramer's V (V) 计算:西班牙的回复率为 77%,拉丁美洲的回复率为 96%。在西班牙,大多数重症监护室隶属于公立医院(88.1%,171/194),而在拉丁美洲,大多数重症监护室隶属于私立医院(56.9%,29/51)。在使用床旁检测方面,67.5% 的西班牙重症监护病房报告经常使用床旁检测(V=0.343),而拉美只有 35.3%。91.7%的西班牙 ICU 和 58.9%的拉丁美洲 ICU 很少或从未使用 SVT(V=0.380)。在西班牙,动脉导管和中心静脉导管使用 CBSD 的比例明显较低(V=0.336)。私立医院在动脉导管中使用 CBSD 的比例高于公立医院(27% vs 8.3%,V=0.278):结论:拉丁美洲可以改进床旁检测,而西班牙则可以加强 CBSD 和小容量试管的使用。私立医院往往比公立医院更有效地实施血液节约技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信