Similar short-term outcomes of ultrasound guided posterior intra-articular and anterior extra-articular corticosteroid injection in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. A randomized controlled, single-blind study.

Ersin Sensoz, Omer Faruk Sevım, Hayrettin Cakmak, Suna Sahin Edız, Engin Ecevız, Selim Ergun
{"title":"Similar short-term outcomes of ultrasound guided posterior intra-articular and anterior extra-articular corticosteroid injection in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. A randomized controlled, single-blind study.","authors":"Ersin Sensoz, Omer Faruk Sevım, Hayrettin Cakmak, Suna Sahin Edız, Engin Ecevız, Selim Ergun","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.23171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frozen shoulder, a condition characterized by the limitation of active and passive shoulder movements, is predominantly managed conservatively. Corticosteroid injection stands as a widely utilized and effective method for treatment. Nevertheless, the optimal approach for administering the injection remains a subject of controversy. We hypothesized that the injection of corticosteroid through anterior into the extra-articular area would yield superior results than the posterior intra-articular injection. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, and single-center clinical study aimed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of ultrasound (USG)-guided injection techniques in patients with primary frozen shoulder. We continued the study with 54 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We evaluated patients pre-injection and at the first, third, and sixth weeks after injection. Two distinct approaches were employed: (1) Injection through the anterior extra-articular area around the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), and (2) injection through the posterior route into the glenohumeral joint. Evaluation parameters, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, active range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, were assessed pre-injection and at the first, third, and sixth weeks post injection. No significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory, or radiological findings were observed between the groups. It was observed that both groups exhibited similar and significant improvement in all measured parameters within their respective groups. Regarding pain scores, a notable decrease in VAS scores was observed in both groups (P = .000). There was no difference between the groups in terms of pre-injection VAS, QuickDASH, and ASES scores and active ROM measurements. The study concluded that there was no significant difference between ultrasound-guided injection of posterior intra-articular injection and anterior extra-articular injection concerning pain, ROM, and functional scores. Both techniques can be considered as viable options in the early stage of the disease. Level I, Therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"58 4","pages":"223-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.23171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frozen shoulder, a condition characterized by the limitation of active and passive shoulder movements, is predominantly managed conservatively. Corticosteroid injection stands as a widely utilized and effective method for treatment. Nevertheless, the optimal approach for administering the injection remains a subject of controversy. We hypothesized that the injection of corticosteroid through anterior into the extra-articular area would yield superior results than the posterior intra-articular injection. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, and single-center clinical study aimed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of ultrasound (USG)-guided injection techniques in patients with primary frozen shoulder. We continued the study with 54 patients who met the inclusion criteria. We evaluated patients pre-injection and at the first, third, and sixth weeks after injection. Two distinct approaches were employed: (1) Injection through the anterior extra-articular area around the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), and (2) injection through the posterior route into the glenohumeral joint. Evaluation parameters, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, active range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, were assessed pre-injection and at the first, third, and sixth weeks post injection. No significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory, or radiological findings were observed between the groups. It was observed that both groups exhibited similar and significant improvement in all measured parameters within their respective groups. Regarding pain scores, a notable decrease in VAS scores was observed in both groups (P = .000). There was no difference between the groups in terms of pre-injection VAS, QuickDASH, and ASES scores and active ROM measurements. The study concluded that there was no significant difference between ultrasound-guided injection of posterior intra-articular injection and anterior extra-articular injection concerning pain, ROM, and functional scores. Both techniques can be considered as viable options in the early stage of the disease. Level I, Therapeutic study.

在治疗原发性肩周炎时,超声引导的后方关节内和前方关节外皮质类固醇注射的短期疗效相似。随机对照单盲研究。
肩周炎是一种以肩部主动和被动活动受限为特征的疾病,主要采用保守治疗。皮质类固醇注射是一种广泛使用的有效治疗方法。然而,注射的最佳方法仍存在争议。我们假设,通过前方向关节外区域注射皮质类固醇会比后方关节内注射产生更好的效果。这项前瞻性、随机、单盲、单中心临床研究旨在比较超声(USG)引导下的注射技术对原发性肩周炎患者的治疗效果。我们继续对 54 名符合纳入标准的患者进行研究。我们在注射前、注射后第一周、第三周和第六周对患者进行了评估。我们采用了两种不同的方法:(1) 通过肱骨冠状韧带(CHL)周围的前关节外区域进行注射;(2) 通过后路进入盂肱关节进行注射。评估参数包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、主动活动范围(ROM)、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分以及手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾(QuickDASH)评分,评估时间为注射前、注射后第一周、第三周和第六周。两组患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征、实验室或放射学检查结果均无明显差异。据观察,两组患者在各自组别内的所有测量参数都有相似且显著的改善。在疼痛评分方面,两组的 VAS 评分均有明显下降(P = 0.000)。在注射前的 VAS、QuickDASH 和 ASES 评分以及活动 ROM 测量方面,两组之间没有差异。研究认为,在疼痛、活动度和功能评分方面,超声引导下的后关节内注射和前关节外注射没有明显差异。在疾病的早期阶段,这两种技术都是可行的选择。I级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信