Trends of Overactive Bladder and Pharmacologic Treatment Among U.S. Women.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lauren A King, Jessica E Pruszynski, Clifford Y Wai, Maria E Florian-Rodriguez
{"title":"Trends of Overactive Bladder and Pharmacologic Treatment Among U.S. Women.","authors":"Lauren A King, Jessica E Pruszynski, Clifford Y Wai, Maria E Florian-Rodriguez","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>To evaluate and consider how prescribing practices have changed in relation to high-risk overactive bladder (OAB) medications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in the prevalence of OAB and pharmacologic treatment over time in the United States.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2001-2018, n = 30,478) and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS, 2003-2019, n = 251,330) were used to identify women with symptomatic incontinence and overactive bladder (OAB) (NHANES) as well as determine the frequency of prescription use for OAB medications (NHANES and NAMCS) using sampling-based weights. Joinpoint regression was used to determine adjusted annual percent change (APC, adjusting for race, age, body mass index, and insurance status). Trends were assessed overall and by race, age, body mass index, and insurance status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of OAB was 31.2% in the final survey year of NHANES (2017-2018). Women aged >65 years had the highest prevalence of OAB at 54% compared with other age groups. There was an overall increase in OAB (APC 1.24 [0.64, 1.84], P = 0.002) over time. Overall, only 3.5% of patients with symptoms of OAB reported pharmacologic treatment in NHANES. The NAMCS demonstrated a significant decrease in anticholinergic prescriptions from 2003 until 2019 (APC -6.44 [-9.77, -2.98], P = 0.001). However, in NHANES, there was no significant change in anticholinergic use (APC 0.62 [-20.2, 26.8], P = 0.944). There was a stable prevalence of β3-adrenergic agonist prescriptions since they were introduced to market (APC 0.65 [-2.24, 3.62], P = 0.616).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates an increasing prevalence of OAB and highlights the likely undertreatment of symptomatic patients. The high and increasing prevalence coupled with the relative undertreatment of OAB underscores the importance of screening for this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: To evaluate and consider how prescribing practices have changed in relation to high-risk overactive bladder (OAB) medications.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in the prevalence of OAB and pharmacologic treatment over time in the United States.

Study design: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2001-2018, n = 30,478) and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS, 2003-2019, n = 251,330) were used to identify women with symptomatic incontinence and overactive bladder (OAB) (NHANES) as well as determine the frequency of prescription use for OAB medications (NHANES and NAMCS) using sampling-based weights. Joinpoint regression was used to determine adjusted annual percent change (APC, adjusting for race, age, body mass index, and insurance status). Trends were assessed overall and by race, age, body mass index, and insurance status.

Results: The prevalence of OAB was 31.2% in the final survey year of NHANES (2017-2018). Women aged >65 years had the highest prevalence of OAB at 54% compared with other age groups. There was an overall increase in OAB (APC 1.24 [0.64, 1.84], P = 0.002) over time. Overall, only 3.5% of patients with symptoms of OAB reported pharmacologic treatment in NHANES. The NAMCS demonstrated a significant decrease in anticholinergic prescriptions from 2003 until 2019 (APC -6.44 [-9.77, -2.98], P = 0.001). However, in NHANES, there was no significant change in anticholinergic use (APC 0.62 [-20.2, 26.8], P = 0.944). There was a stable prevalence of β3-adrenergic agonist prescriptions since they were introduced to market (APC 0.65 [-2.24, 3.62], P = 0.616).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates an increasing prevalence of OAB and highlights the likely undertreatment of symptomatic patients. The high and increasing prevalence coupled with the relative undertreatment of OAB underscores the importance of screening for this condition.

美国女性膀胱过度活动症和药物治疗趋势。
重要性:评估和思考高风险膀胱过度活动症(OAB)药物处方的变化:评估并考虑高风险膀胱过度活动症(OAB)药物处方的变化情况:本研究旨在评估美国膀胱过度活动症患病率和药物治疗随时间推移的趋势:研究设计:采用全国健康与营养调查(NHANES,2001-2018 年,n = 30,478 人)和全国流动医疗护理调查(NAMCS,2003-2019 年,n = 251,330 人)的数据来识别有症状尿失禁和膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的女性(NHANES),并使用基于抽样的权重来确定 OAB 药物处方的使用频率(NHANES 和 NAMCS)。采用连接点回归法确定调整后的年百分比变化(APC,根据种族、年龄、体重指数和保险状况进行调整)。对总体趋势以及不同种族、年龄、体重指数和保险状况的趋势进行了评估:在 NHANES 的最后调查年(2017-2018 年),OAB 患病率为 31.2%。与其他年龄组相比,年龄大于 65 岁的女性 OAB 患病率最高,为 54%。随着时间的推移,OAB的患病率总体呈上升趋势(APC 1.24 [0.64, 1.84],P = 0.002)。总体而言,在 NHANES 调查中,仅有 3.5% 有 OAB 症状的患者报告接受过药物治疗。NAMCS 显示,从 2003 年到 2019 年,抗胆碱能药物处方显著减少(APC -6.44 [-9.77, -2.98],P = 0.001)。然而,在 NHANES 中,抗胆碱能药物的使用没有明显变化(APC 0.62 [-20.2, 26.8],P = 0.944)。自β3-肾上腺素能激动剂上市以来,其处方使用率保持稳定(APC 0.65 [-2.24, 3.62],P = 0.616):这项研究表明,OAB 的患病率在不断上升,同时也凸显出对有症状患者的治疗可能不足。OAB 的高患病率和不断增加的患病率以及相对较少的治疗突出了筛查这种疾病的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信