Preventing the Next Neglected Pessary: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Patrick Popiel, Maralyn Maggi, Shana Dalal, Meghan Curran, Leslie M Rickey
{"title":"Preventing the Next Neglected Pessary: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Patrick Popiel, Maralyn Maggi, Shana Dalal, Meghan Curran, Leslie M Rickey","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Pessaries are commonly used to manage pelvic organ prolapse. Pessary management can be done by a medical professional or the patient themselves. Pessary complications are rare. However, pessaries can be difficult to track, and patients who are lost to follow-up are at an increased risk of complications such as vaginal ulceration, pessary embedment, and fistulization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To create and implement a quality improvement initiative focusing on preventing neglected pessaries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Through the electronic medical record, we implemented a quality improvement initiative focused on creating a workflow where a pessary can be designated as an implant when inserted. A year after implementation, data was gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 37% (55/147) of patients without follow-up in the 3 months after pessary placement. Of those, 24% were no longer using pessaries, 24% were self-maintaining or having surveillance with their primary OB/GYN, 16% had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse since placement of the pessary, 15% were lost to follow-up and were considered to be patients \"at risk,\" and 12% did not have a pessary placed to begin with. Review showed 53% of patients with proper documentation and designation of pessary as an implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This quality improvement initiative can identify patients lost to follow-up, leading to improved patient care and potential to prevent complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Pessaries are commonly used to manage pelvic organ prolapse. Pessary management can be done by a medical professional or the patient themselves. Pessary complications are rare. However, pessaries can be difficult to track, and patients who are lost to follow-up are at an increased risk of complications such as vaginal ulceration, pessary embedment, and fistulization.

Objectives: To create and implement a quality improvement initiative focusing on preventing neglected pessaries.

Study design: Through the electronic medical record, we implemented a quality improvement initiative focused on creating a workflow where a pessary can be designated as an implant when inserted. A year after implementation, data was gathered.

Results: We identified 37% (55/147) of patients without follow-up in the 3 months after pessary placement. Of those, 24% were no longer using pessaries, 24% were self-maintaining or having surveillance with their primary OB/GYN, 16% had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse since placement of the pessary, 15% were lost to follow-up and were considered to be patients "at risk," and 12% did not have a pessary placed to begin with. Review showed 53% of patients with proper documentation and designation of pessary as an implant.

Conclusions: This quality improvement initiative can identify patients lost to follow-up, leading to improved patient care and potential to prevent complications.

预防下一个被忽视的雌激素:质量改进计划。
重要性:泌尿器通常用于控制盆腔器官脱垂。可由专业医务人员或患者自己进行泌尿器管理。泌尿器并发症很少见。然而,肛门填塞器很难跟踪,失去随访的患者发生阴道溃疡、肛门填塞器嵌入和瘘管等并发症的风险会增加:研究设计:研究设计:通过电子病历,我们实施了一项质量改进措施,重点是创建一个工作流程,在插入时可将栓塞指定为植入物。实施一年后,我们收集了相关数据:结果:我们发现 37% 的患者(55/147)在置入栓塞后 3 个月内未接受随访。其中,24%的患者不再使用栓塞器,24%的患者自行维护或由其主治妇产科医生进行监测,16%的患者在放置栓塞器后因盆腔器官脱垂接受了手术,15%的患者失去了随访机会,被视为 "高危 "患者,12%的患者一开始就没有放置栓塞器。复查显示,53%的患者有正确的文件记录,并将栓塞指定为植入物:这项质量改进措施可以识别失去随访的患者,从而改善患者护理,并有可能预防并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信