Patrick Popiel, Maralyn Maggi, Shana Dalal, Meghan Curran, Leslie M Rickey
{"title":"Preventing the Next Neglected Pessary: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Patrick Popiel, Maralyn Maggi, Shana Dalal, Meghan Curran, Leslie M Rickey","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Pessaries are commonly used to manage pelvic organ prolapse. Pessary management can be done by a medical professional or the patient themselves. Pessary complications are rare. However, pessaries can be difficult to track, and patients who are lost to follow-up are at an increased risk of complications such as vaginal ulceration, pessary embedment, and fistulization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To create and implement a quality improvement initiative focusing on preventing neglected pessaries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Through the electronic medical record, we implemented a quality improvement initiative focused on creating a workflow where a pessary can be designated as an implant when inserted. A year after implementation, data was gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 37% (55/147) of patients without follow-up in the 3 months after pessary placement. Of those, 24% were no longer using pessaries, 24% were self-maintaining or having surveillance with their primary OB/GYN, 16% had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse since placement of the pessary, 15% were lost to follow-up and were considered to be patients \"at risk,\" and 12% did not have a pessary placed to begin with. Review showed 53% of patients with proper documentation and designation of pessary as an implant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This quality improvement initiative can identify patients lost to follow-up, leading to improved patient care and potential to prevent complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Pessaries are commonly used to manage pelvic organ prolapse. Pessary management can be done by a medical professional or the patient themselves. Pessary complications are rare. However, pessaries can be difficult to track, and patients who are lost to follow-up are at an increased risk of complications such as vaginal ulceration, pessary embedment, and fistulization.
Objectives: To create and implement a quality improvement initiative focusing on preventing neglected pessaries.
Study design: Through the electronic medical record, we implemented a quality improvement initiative focused on creating a workflow where a pessary can be designated as an implant when inserted. A year after implementation, data was gathered.
Results: We identified 37% (55/147) of patients without follow-up in the 3 months after pessary placement. Of those, 24% were no longer using pessaries, 24% were self-maintaining or having surveillance with their primary OB/GYN, 16% had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse since placement of the pessary, 15% were lost to follow-up and were considered to be patients "at risk," and 12% did not have a pessary placed to begin with. Review showed 53% of patients with proper documentation and designation of pessary as an implant.
Conclusions: This quality improvement initiative can identify patients lost to follow-up, leading to improved patient care and potential to prevent complications.