The prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with 'non-anginal chest pain'.

The British journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-03-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5837/bjc.2024.009
William Chick, Anita Macnab
{"title":"The prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with 'non-anginal chest pain'.","authors":"William Chick, Anita Macnab","doi":"10.5837/bjc.2024.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advise against routine testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with non-anginal chest pain (NACP). This clinical audit sought to establish the prevalence of significant CAD in this cohort using computed tomography angiography (CTCA) and evaluate differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors between those with and without obstructive coronary disease. Over 23 months, 866 patients with NACP underwent CTCA. Patients were separated into three groups for analysis depending on the degree of CAD on CTCA using the CAD-RADS (Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System) scoring system; no evidence of CAD (group 1), a degree of CAD requiring medical therapy only (group 2), significant CAD defined as a CAD-RADS score 4A/B or 5 (group 3). Cardiovascular risk factors were compared between the groups. We found 11.5% had significant CAD (group 3), 58.3% required medical therapy (group 2) and 30.1% had no CAD (group 1). There were 32 patients who required coronary revascularisation. Patients in group 2 and 3 were more likely to be male (p<0.001) and older (p<0.001) when compared to patients in group 1. Patients in group 3 were more likely to be hypertensive (p=0.008) and have higher Qrisk2 scores (p<0.001) when compared with those in group 1. In conclusion, NICE guidelines for NACP may result in a significant proportion of patients with CAD being underdiagnosed, including some with severe disease requiring revascularisation. This analysis suggests age, male gender, Qrisk2 score and hypertension are predictors of CAD in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":74959,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of cardiology","volume":"31 1","pages":"009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5837/bjc.2024.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advise against routine testing for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with non-anginal chest pain (NACP). This clinical audit sought to establish the prevalence of significant CAD in this cohort using computed tomography angiography (CTCA) and evaluate differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors between those with and without obstructive coronary disease. Over 23 months, 866 patients with NACP underwent CTCA. Patients were separated into three groups for analysis depending on the degree of CAD on CTCA using the CAD-RADS (Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System) scoring system; no evidence of CAD (group 1), a degree of CAD requiring medical therapy only (group 2), significant CAD defined as a CAD-RADS score 4A/B or 5 (group 3). Cardiovascular risk factors were compared between the groups. We found 11.5% had significant CAD (group 3), 58.3% required medical therapy (group 2) and 30.1% had no CAD (group 1). There were 32 patients who required coronary revascularisation. Patients in group 2 and 3 were more likely to be male (p<0.001) and older (p<0.001) when compared to patients in group 1. Patients in group 3 were more likely to be hypertensive (p=0.008) and have higher Qrisk2 scores (p<0.001) when compared with those in group 1. In conclusion, NICE guidelines for NACP may result in a significant proportion of patients with CAD being underdiagnosed, including some with severe disease requiring revascularisation. This analysis suggests age, male gender, Qrisk2 score and hypertension are predictors of CAD in this cohort.

非心绞痛胸痛 "患者中冠状动脉疾病的患病率。
美国国家健康与护理优化研究所(NICE)建议不要对非心绞痛胸痛(NACP)患者进行常规冠状动脉疾病(CAD)检测。这项临床审核旨在通过计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTCA)确定这一人群中明显的冠状动脉疾病的患病率,并评估有和没有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的患者之间心血管风险因素患病率的差异。在 23 个月的时间里,866 名 NACP 患者接受了 CTCA 检查。根据使用 CAD-RADS(冠状动脉疾病报告和数据系统)评分系统进行的 CTCA 检查显示的冠状动脉阻塞程度,患者被分为三组进行分析:无冠状动脉阻塞证据组(第 1 组)、仅需药物治疗的冠状动脉阻塞程度组(第 2 组)、CAD-RADS 评分为 4A/B 或 5 分的明显冠状动脉阻塞组(第 3 组)。我们对各组的心血管风险因素进行了比较。我们发现11.5%的患者有明显的CAD(第3组),58.3%的患者需要药物治疗(第2组),30.1%的患者没有CAD(第1组)。有 32 名患者需要进行冠状动脉血运重建。第 2 组和第 3 组的患者更多是男性(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信