Justin Cottrell, David Landsberger, Matt Breen, Joseph Lebowitz, Mari Hagiwara, Gul Moonis, William Shapiro, David R Friedmann, Daniel Jethanamest, Sean McMenomey, J Thomas Roland
{"title":"Cochlear Apex Triangulation Utilizing Ct Measures And Middle Ear Landmarks.","authors":"Justin Cottrell, David Landsberger, Matt Breen, Joseph Lebowitz, Mari Hagiwara, Gul Moonis, William Shapiro, David R Friedmann, Daniel Jethanamest, Sean McMenomey, J Thomas Roland","doi":"10.1097/ONO.0000000000000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective image analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":74382,"journal":{"name":"Otology & neurotology open","volume":"4 3","pages":"e060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & neurotology open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ONO.0000000000000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement.
Study design: Retrospective image analysis.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Patients: Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging.
Intervention: None.
Main outcome measure: Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures.
Results: Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients.
Conclusions: This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.