A longitudinal mixed methods evaluation of a facilitation training intervention to build implementation capacity.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1408801
Veronica-Aurelia Costea, Annika Bäck, Anna Bergström, Andreas Lundin, Henna Hasson, Leif Eriksson
{"title":"A longitudinal mixed methods evaluation of a facilitation training intervention to build implementation capacity.","authors":"Veronica-Aurelia Costea, Annika Bäck, Anna Bergström, Andreas Lundin, Henna Hasson, Leif Eriksson","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1408801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a demand for facilitators who can ease the collaboration within a team or an organization in the implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and who are positioned to build the implementation capacity in an organization. This study aimed to evaluate the results the Building implementation capacity for facilitation (BIC-F) intervention had on the participants' perceived knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy to facilitate implementation and the normalization of a systematic implementation model into their work routines, and its use into their respective organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BIC-F intervention was delivered to 37 facilitators in six workshops, which focused on teaching participants to apply a systematic implementation model and various facilitation tools and strategies. A longitudinal mixed methods design was used to evaluate the intervention. Data was collected pre- and post-intervention using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews grounded on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive (mean, SD) and inferential (paired t-tests) methods. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive content analysis according to NPT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increase in the participants' perceived knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy was observed post-intervention. Normalization of the systematic implementation model in the participants' work routines was in an early phase, facilitated by high coherence, however, other NPT mechanisms were not sufficiently activated yet to contribute to full normalization. In the organizations where participants initiated the normalization process, they were still working towards achieving coherence and cognitive participation among relevant stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention had positive results on the participants' perceived knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy and these recognized the value of a systematic implementation model for their practice. However, further efforts are needed to apply it consistently as a part of their work routines and in the organization. Future interventions should provide long-term support for facilitators, and include methods to transfer training between organizational levels and to overcome contextual barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1408801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1408801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a demand for facilitators who can ease the collaboration within a team or an organization in the implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and who are positioned to build the implementation capacity in an organization. This study aimed to evaluate the results the Building implementation capacity for facilitation (BIC-F) intervention had on the participants' perceived knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy to facilitate implementation and the normalization of a systematic implementation model into their work routines, and its use into their respective organizations.

Methods: The BIC-F intervention was delivered to 37 facilitators in six workshops, which focused on teaching participants to apply a systematic implementation model and various facilitation tools and strategies. A longitudinal mixed methods design was used to evaluate the intervention. Data was collected pre- and post-intervention using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews grounded on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive (mean, SD) and inferential (paired t-tests) methods. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive content analysis according to NPT.

Results: An increase in the participants' perceived knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy was observed post-intervention. Normalization of the systematic implementation model in the participants' work routines was in an early phase, facilitated by high coherence, however, other NPT mechanisms were not sufficiently activated yet to contribute to full normalization. In the organizations where participants initiated the normalization process, they were still working towards achieving coherence and cognitive participation among relevant stakeholders.

Conclusion: The intervention had positive results on the participants' perceived knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy and these recognized the value of a systematic implementation model for their practice. However, further efforts are needed to apply it consistently as a part of their work routines and in the organization. Future interventions should provide long-term support for facilitators, and include methods to transfer training between organizational levels and to overcome contextual barriers.

对培养实施能力的促进培训干预措施进行纵向混合方法评估。
背景:在循证干预措施(EBI)的实施过程中,团队或组织内部需要能够缓解协作的促进者,而促进者的定位是培养组织的实施能力。本研究旨在评估 "培养促进实施能力"(BIC-F)干预措施对参与者的知识、技能和自我效能的影响,以促进实施、将系统实施模式纳入其工作常规以及在其各自组织中的使用:BIC-F 干预措施是在六次研讨会上向 37 名促进者提供的,重点是教导参与者应用系统实施模式以及各种促进工具和策略。采用纵向混合方法设计对干预措施进行评估。以规范化过程理论(NPT)为基础,通过问卷调查和半结构式访谈收集干预前后的数据。定量数据采用描述性(平均值、标度)和推断性(配对 t 检验)方法进行分析。定性数据根据 NPT 采用演绎内容分析法进行分析:结果:干预后,参与者的知识、技能和自我效能感都有所提高。在参与者的工作常规中,系统实施模式的正常化处于早期阶段,这得益于高度的一致性,然而,其他 NPT 机制尚未被充分激活,无法促进完全正常化。在参与者启动正常化进程的组织中,他们仍在努力实现一致性和相关利益攸关方的认知参与:干预措施对参与者的认知知识、技能和自我效能产生了积极影响,他们认识到系统实施模式对其实践的价值。不过,还需要进一步努力,将其作为工作常规的一部分在组织中持续应用。未来的干预措施应为促进者提供长期支持,并包括在组织层面之间转移培训和克服环境障碍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信