A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241275962
Frederick M Hecht, Rebecca S Crane, Patricia Moran, Willem Kuyken, Wendy Hartogensis, Judson Brewer
{"title":"A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity.","authors":"Frederick M Hecht, Rebecca S Crane, Patricia Moran, Willem Kuyken, Wendy Hartogensis, Judson Brewer","doi":"10.1177/27536130241275962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior data suggests the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: (MBI) Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) has good inter-rater reliability, but many raters knew teacher experience level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to further evaluate the MBI-TAC's inter-rater reliability and obtain preliminary data on predictive validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We videorecorded 21 MBSR teachers from academic and community settings. We trained 19 experienced MBI teachers in using the MBI:TAC. MBSR teachers were rated by three assessors; teachers and their assessors did not know one another. To assess predictive validity, MBSR students in courses taught by 18 of the MBSR teachers were invited to complete PROMIS-29 measures before the MBSR course, at the end of the course (month 2), and month 4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) representing a single rater ranged from 0.33 to 0.56 on the 6 MBI:TAC domains. Using an average of two raters, ICC estimates ranged from 0.48 to 0.71 and ICCs generalizing to an average of three raters ranged from 0.6 to 0.8. Among n = 152 participating MBSR students, we found improvements from baseline to 2 months and 4 months in PROMIS measures of Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep, and Social Role function (range in improvement 2.3 to 6.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001 for all comparisons except Social Role at 2 months, <i>P</i> = 0.007). Higher MBI:TAC ratings were associated with greater improvements in anxiety among MBSR students from baseline to 2 months, with a -0.31 lower participant anxiety score per 1 unit increase in MBI:TAC composite teaching rating (95% CI -0.58, -0.05, <i>P</i> = 0.019), but we did not find statistically significant relationships with improvements in other PROMIS-29 domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICCs indicated good reliability using an average of three ratings, but inter-rater reliability was only fair using a single rater. We found initial validation that higher MBI:TAC ratings predicted greater improvements in anxiety symptoms in MBSR participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11423373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241275962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior data suggests the Mindfulness-Based Interventions: (MBI) Teaching Assessment Criteria (MBI:TAC) has good inter-rater reliability, but many raters knew teacher experience level.

Objective: We sought to further evaluate the MBI-TAC's inter-rater reliability and obtain preliminary data on predictive validity.

Methods: We videorecorded 21 MBSR teachers from academic and community settings. We trained 19 experienced MBI teachers in using the MBI:TAC. MBSR teachers were rated by three assessors; teachers and their assessors did not know one another. To assess predictive validity, MBSR students in courses taught by 18 of the MBSR teachers were invited to complete PROMIS-29 measures before the MBSR course, at the end of the course (month 2), and month 4.

Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) representing a single rater ranged from 0.33 to 0.56 on the 6 MBI:TAC domains. Using an average of two raters, ICC estimates ranged from 0.48 to 0.71 and ICCs generalizing to an average of three raters ranged from 0.6 to 0.8. Among n = 152 participating MBSR students, we found improvements from baseline to 2 months and 4 months in PROMIS measures of Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep, and Social Role function (range in improvement 2.3 to 6.3, P < 0.0001 for all comparisons except Social Role at 2 months, P = 0.007). Higher MBI:TAC ratings were associated with greater improvements in anxiety among MBSR students from baseline to 2 months, with a -0.31 lower participant anxiety score per 1 unit increase in MBI:TAC composite teaching rating (95% CI -0.58, -0.05, P = 0.019), but we did not find statistically significant relationships with improvements in other PROMIS-29 domains.

Conclusions: ICCs indicated good reliability using an average of three ratings, but inter-rater reliability was only fair using a single rater. We found initial validation that higher MBI:TAC ratings predicted greater improvements in anxiety symptoms in MBSR participants.

基于正念的干预教学评估标准的验证研究》,用于评估基于正念的干预教师技能:评分者之间的可靠性和预测有效性。
背景:先前的数据表明,基于正念的干预:(MBI)教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)具有良好的评定者间可靠性,但许多评定者知道教师的经验水平:先前的数据表明,基于正念的干预:(MBI)教学评估标准(MBI:TAC)具有良好的评分者间可靠性,但许多评分者知道教师的经验水平:我们试图进一步评估 MBI-TAC 的评分者间可靠性,并获得预测有效性的初步数据:我们对 21 名来自学术和社区环境的 MBSR 教师进行了录像。我们对 19 名经验丰富的 MBI 教师进行了使用 MBI:TAC 的培训。MBSR教师由三名评估者进行评分;教师和评估者互不相识。为了评估预测有效性,我们邀请了18名MBSR教师所教课程的MBSR学生在MBSR课程开始前、课程结束时(第2个月)和第4个月完成PROMIS-29测量:在 MBI:TAC 的 6 个领域中,代表单个评分者的类内相关系数(ICC)从 0.33 到 0.56 不等。使用两个评分者的平均值,ICC 估计值介于 0.48 到 0.71 之间,而归纳为三个评分者平均值的 ICC 介于 0.6 到 0.8 之间。在 n = 152 名参与 MBSR 的学生中,我们发现焦虑、抑郁、疲劳、睡眠和社会角色功能的 PROMIS 测量结果从基线到 2 个月和 4 个月都有所改善(改善范围为 2.3 到 6.3,所有比较的 P < 0.0001,但 2 个月的社会角色除外,P = 0.007)。从基线到2个月期间,MBI:TAC评分越高,MBSR学生的焦虑改善程度越大,MBI:TAC综合教学评分每增加1个单位,参与者的焦虑得分就会降低-0.31(95% CI -0.58,-0.05,P = 0.019),但我们没有发现MBI:TAC评分与PROMIS-29其他领域的改善有显著的统计学关系:ICCs表明,使用三个评分的平均值具有良好的可靠性,但使用单个评分者的评分者间可靠性一般。我们发现,MBI:TAC评分越高,预示着 MBSR 参与者的焦虑症状改善程度越大,这一点得到了初步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信