Professional experience and case management as predictors of nursing good practices directed to the primary caregiver

Javier Zarzo-Gasull , Rosa María García-Padilla , Pedro García-Martínez , Paola Méndez-Castellano , Juan Cava-Maldonado
{"title":"Professional experience and case management as predictors of nursing good practices directed to the primary caregiver","authors":"Javier Zarzo-Gasull ,&nbsp;Rosa María García-Padilla ,&nbsp;Pedro García-Martínez ,&nbsp;Paola Méndez-Castellano ,&nbsp;Juan Cava-Maldonado","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Identify nursing good practices related to caregivers in three basic health areas of the Valencian Community and analyze the impact of professional experience and the presence of a Nurse Case Manager on nursing good practices.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Cross-sectional descriptive study. An anonymous, self-administered “ad hoc” questionnaire was used with 10 items: 8 individual and 2 institutional good practices. The independent variables were: work experience and the presence of a Nurse Case Manager. An analytical study was carried out using Chi square, Fisher and Mann-Whitney U tests, assuming p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 as a significant value.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>60 participants: 50 women, median age of 36 years and median experience of 4 years. 45 with experience ≥<!--> <!-->2 years and 23 worked in an environment with Nurse Case Manager.</div><div>The record of the caregiver was the only individual good practice carried out by more than 56% of the population, with the rest implemented by less than 20%. Pre- or post-pandemic experience did not show significant differences, the presence of Nurse Case Manager only showed differences in knowledge of training workshops and individual good practices were greater among professionals with more experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individual good practices in caring for caregivers have low implementation, with better practices observed among professionals with more experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":"34 5","pages":"Pages 402-407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147924000791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Identify nursing good practices related to caregivers in three basic health areas of the Valencian Community and analyze the impact of professional experience and the presence of a Nurse Case Manager on nursing good practices.

Method

Cross-sectional descriptive study. An anonymous, self-administered “ad hoc” questionnaire was used with 10 items: 8 individual and 2 institutional good practices. The independent variables were: work experience and the presence of a Nurse Case Manager. An analytical study was carried out using Chi square, Fisher and Mann-Whitney U tests, assuming p < 0.05 as a significant value.

Results

60 participants: 50 women, median age of 36 years and median experience of 4 years. 45 with experience ≥ 2 years and 23 worked in an environment with Nurse Case Manager.
The record of the caregiver was the only individual good practice carried out by more than 56% of the population, with the rest implemented by less than 20%. Pre- or post-pandemic experience did not show significant differences, the presence of Nurse Case Manager only showed differences in knowledge of training workshops and individual good practices were greater among professionals with more experience.

Conclusions

Individual good practices in caring for caregivers have low implementation, with better practices observed among professionals with more experience.
专业经验和个案管理是针对主要护理人员的良好护理实践的预测因素。
目的:确定巴伦西亚社区三个基本保健领域中与护理人员相关的良好护理实践,并分析专业经验和护士个案经理的存在对良好护理实践的影响:横断面描述性研究。采用匿名、自填的 "特别 "问卷,共有 10 个项目:其中 8 项为个人良好实践,2 项为机构良好实践。自变量为:工作经验和是否有护士个案管理员。分析研究使用了 Chi Square、Fisher 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验,假设 p 为结果:60 名参与者:50 名女性,年龄中位数为 36 岁,工作经验中位数为 4 年。45人的工作经验≥2年,23人在有护士个案经理的环境中工作。护理人员记录是 56% 以上的人实施的唯一一项个人良好做法,其余实施者不到 20%。疫情发生前或发生后的经验并没有显示出明显的差异,是否有护士个案管理员只显示出培训讲习班知识的差异,而经验丰富的专业人员采用的个人良好做法更多:结论:在照顾护理人员方面,个人良好做法的实施率较低,经验丰富的专业人员的做法较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信