Editorial Commentary: Pain Relief Following a Preoperative Diagnostic Hip Injection Does Not Predict 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoral Acetabular Impingement Syndrome.
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Pain Relief Following a Preoperative Diagnostic Hip Injection Does Not Predict 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoral Acetabular Impingement Syndrome.","authors":"Robert Kollmorgen","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For decades, hip preservationists have utilized intra-articular preoperative injections for diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. In the presence of typical or atypical hip pain, impingement, instability, and torsional abnormalities, hip preservationists are challenged with consistently educating ourselves and patients on interventions that can predict long-term relief. Current evidence on the predictive postoperative value of a positive injection response is mixed. Injection results can show whether the patient's symptoms are coming from the hip and to what extent, but they may not predict future outcomes. The patient is more complicated than a positive or negative injection response, and the decision for surgery should be taken in context to all clinical factors, imaging findings, and patient expectations. Proper rehabilitation is also vital. Finally, a negative injection response in a patient diagnosed with femoral acetabular impingement syndrome should not deter the decision for surgery. With the correct diagnosis and procedure, patients can do well.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For decades, hip preservationists have utilized intra-articular preoperative injections for diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. In the presence of typical or atypical hip pain, impingement, instability, and torsional abnormalities, hip preservationists are challenged with consistently educating ourselves and patients on interventions that can predict long-term relief. Current evidence on the predictive postoperative value of a positive injection response is mixed. Injection results can show whether the patient's symptoms are coming from the hip and to what extent, but they may not predict future outcomes. The patient is more complicated than a positive or negative injection response, and the decision for surgery should be taken in context to all clinical factors, imaging findings, and patient expectations. Proper rehabilitation is also vital. Finally, a negative injection response in a patient diagnosed with femoral acetabular impingement syndrome should not deter the decision for surgery. With the correct diagnosis and procedure, patients can do well.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.