Experiences of integrating social prescribing link workers into primary care in England: Bolting on, fitting in or belonging.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stephanie Tierney, Debra Westlake, Geoff Wong, Amadea Turk, Steven Markham, Jordan Gorenberg, Joanne Reeve, Caroline Mitchell, Kerryn Husk, Sabi Redwood, Catherine Pope, Beccy Baird, Kamal R Mahtani
{"title":"Experiences of integrating social prescribing link workers into primary care in England: Bolting on, fitting in or belonging.","authors":"Stephanie Tierney, Debra Westlake, Geoff Wong, Amadea Turk, Steven Markham, Jordan Gorenberg, Joanne Reeve, Caroline Mitchell, Kerryn Husk, Sabi Redwood, Catherine Pope, Beccy Baird, Kamal R Mahtani","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the 2019 NHS Long-Term Plan, link workers (LWs) have been employed across primary care in England to deliver social prescribing (SP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand and explain how the LW role is being implemented in primary care in England.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Realist evaluation undertaken in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Focused ethnographies around seven LWs from different parts of England. As part of this, we interviewed 61 patients and 93 professionals from healthcare and the voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector. We reinterviewed 41 patients, seven LWs and a LW manager 9-12 months after their first interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We developed four concepts around how LWs are integrated (or not) within primary care: Centralising or diffusing power; Forging an identity in general practice; Demonstrating effect; Building a facilitative infrastructure. These concepts informed the development of a programme theory around a continuum of integration of LWs into primary care - from being 'bolted on' to existing provision, without much consideration, to 'fitting in', shaping what is delivered to be accommodating, through to 'belonging', whereby they are accepted as a legitimate source of support, making a valued contribution to patients' broader well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SP was introduced into primary care to promote greater attention to the full range of factors affecting patients' health and well-being, beyond biomedicine. For that to happen, our analysis highlights the need for a whole system approach to defining, delivering and maintaining this new part of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following the 2019 NHS Long-Term Plan, link workers (LWs) have been employed across primary care in England to deliver social prescribing (SP).

Aim: To understand and explain how the LW role is being implemented in primary care in England.

Design and setting: Realist evaluation undertaken in England.

Method: Focused ethnographies around seven LWs from different parts of England. As part of this, we interviewed 61 patients and 93 professionals from healthcare and the voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector. We reinterviewed 41 patients, seven LWs and a LW manager 9-12 months after their first interview.

Results: We developed four concepts around how LWs are integrated (or not) within primary care: Centralising or diffusing power; Forging an identity in general practice; Demonstrating effect; Building a facilitative infrastructure. These concepts informed the development of a programme theory around a continuum of integration of LWs into primary care - from being 'bolted on' to existing provision, without much consideration, to 'fitting in', shaping what is delivered to be accommodating, through to 'belonging', whereby they are accepted as a legitimate source of support, making a valued contribution to patients' broader well-being.

Conclusion: SP was introduced into primary care to promote greater attention to the full range of factors affecting patients' health and well-being, beyond biomedicine. For that to happen, our analysis highlights the need for a whole system approach to defining, delivering and maintaining this new part of practice.

英格兰将社会处方联系工作者纳入初级保健的经验:勉强、融入还是归属。
背景:目的:了解并解释英国基层医疗机构如何实施联系工作者(LWs)角色:设计与环境:在英格兰进行的现实主义评估:方法:围绕英格兰不同地区的七个 LW 进行重点民族志研究。作为其中的一部分,我们采访了 61 名患者和 93 名医疗保健及志愿、社区和社会企业 (VCSE) 部门的专业人士。在首次访谈结束 9-12 个月后,我们再次访谈了 41 名患者、7 名 LW 和 1 名 LW 管理者:结果:我们围绕基层医疗机构如何整合(或不整合)劳动妇女提出了四个概念:集中或分散权力;在全科实践中形成一种身份认同;展示效果;建立促进性基础设施。这些概念为制定方案理论提供了依据,该方案理论围绕着将法律工作者纳入初级医疗保健的连续性展开--从未经深思熟虑就 "匆忙加入 "现有服务,到 "融入 "服务,塑造所提供的服务以适应需求,再到 "归属 "服务,法律工作者被视为合法的支持来源,为患者更广泛的福祉做出了有价值的贡献:在初级保健中引入 SP,是为了促进对影响患者健康和幸福的生物医学以外的各种因素给予更多关注。为了实现这一目标,我们的分析强调需要采用全系统方法来定义、提供和维护这一新的实践部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信