Equity in Digital Health: Assessing Access and Utilization of Remote Patient Monitoring, Medical Apps, and Wearables in Underserved Communities.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Omolola Adepoju, Patrick Dang, Holly Nguyen, Jennifer Mertz
{"title":"Equity in Digital Health: Assessing Access and Utilization of Remote Patient Monitoring, Medical Apps, and Wearables in Underserved Communities.","authors":"Omolola Adepoju, Patrick Dang, Holly Nguyen, Jennifer Mertz","doi":"10.1177/00469580241271137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined access to, and use of remote patient monitoring (RPM), medical applications, and wearables in a racially diverse, lower-income population. Data were obtained via a cross-sectional survey of adults from low-income communities in Houston, Los Angeles, and New York between April and August 2023. The survey examined access to, and use of RPM, medical applications, and wearables, among respondents. Binary responses to the following questions were examined using logistic regression models: In the past 12 months, have you (i) used RPM, (ii) used a medical app, and (iii) used an electronic wearable device to monitor or track health or activity? A total of 305 surveys were returned, of which 212 were complete (69.5% completion rate). Demographically, 22% self-identified as Hispanic, 41% as non-Hispanic Black individuals, and 33% as non-Hispanic White individuals. Overall, 69% of respondents reported a pre-tax annual household income of less than $35 000 and 96% indicated they own a smart phone. However, only 3 of 10 reported using RPM, 15% reported using a medical app, and 14% reported using wearables. Race was strongly associated with RPM usage, with Black respondents significantly less likely to have used RPM, compared to their white counterparts (OR: 0.31, <i>P</i> = .002). Education (bachelor's degree or more OR: 4.79, <i>P</i> = .03) and higher income ($35 001 + OR: 4.68, <i>P</i> = .008) were strongly associated with medical app usage. In the wearables model, the same trend was observed with education (bachelor's degree or more OR: 4.45, <i>P</i> = .04), and higher income ($35 001 + OR: 5.49, <i>P</i> = .01). Compared to earlier studies that have reported utilization rates of between 50% and 60%, our finding of much lower utilization in economically disadvantaged populations that are at greater risks for sub-optimal health outcomes gives cause for greater concern. Considering the ongoing proliferation of digital health technological modalities, this further highlights the need to explore and address equity-based barriers to these health tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241271137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined access to, and use of remote patient monitoring (RPM), medical applications, and wearables in a racially diverse, lower-income population. Data were obtained via a cross-sectional survey of adults from low-income communities in Houston, Los Angeles, and New York between April and August 2023. The survey examined access to, and use of RPM, medical applications, and wearables, among respondents. Binary responses to the following questions were examined using logistic regression models: In the past 12 months, have you (i) used RPM, (ii) used a medical app, and (iii) used an electronic wearable device to monitor or track health or activity? A total of 305 surveys were returned, of which 212 were complete (69.5% completion rate). Demographically, 22% self-identified as Hispanic, 41% as non-Hispanic Black individuals, and 33% as non-Hispanic White individuals. Overall, 69% of respondents reported a pre-tax annual household income of less than $35 000 and 96% indicated they own a smart phone. However, only 3 of 10 reported using RPM, 15% reported using a medical app, and 14% reported using wearables. Race was strongly associated with RPM usage, with Black respondents significantly less likely to have used RPM, compared to their white counterparts (OR: 0.31, P = .002). Education (bachelor's degree or more OR: 4.79, P = .03) and higher income ($35 001 + OR: 4.68, P = .008) were strongly associated with medical app usage. In the wearables model, the same trend was observed with education (bachelor's degree or more OR: 4.45, P = .04), and higher income ($35 001 + OR: 5.49, P = .01). Compared to earlier studies that have reported utilization rates of between 50% and 60%, our finding of much lower utilization in economically disadvantaged populations that are at greater risks for sub-optimal health outcomes gives cause for greater concern. Considering the ongoing proliferation of digital health technological modalities, this further highlights the need to explore and address equity-based barriers to these health tools.

数字健康的公平性:评估远程患者监护、医疗应用程序和可穿戴设备在医疗服务不足社区的获取和利用情况。
本研究调查了不同种族的低收入人群获得和使用远程患者监护(RPM)、医疗应用和可穿戴设备的情况。数据是在 2023 年 4 月至 8 月期间通过对休斯顿、洛杉矶和纽约低收入社区的成年人进行横断面调查获得的。调查考察了受访者对 RPM、医疗应用和可穿戴设备的获取和使用情况。使用逻辑回归模型对以下问题的二进制回答进行了研究:在过去 12 个月中,您是否 (i) 使用过 RPM,(ii) 使用过医疗应用程序,(iii) 使用过电子可穿戴设备来监测或跟踪健康状况或活动?共收回 305 份调查问卷,其中 212 份完整(完成率为 69.5%)。从人口统计学角度来看,22% 的受访者自我认同为西班牙裔,41% 为非西班牙裔黑人,33% 为非西班牙裔白人。总体而言,69% 的受访者表示税前家庭年收入低于 35000 美元,96% 的受访者表示他们拥有一部智能手机。然而,每 10 位受访者中只有 3 位使用 RPM,15% 使用医疗应用程序,14% 使用可穿戴设备。种族与 RPM 的使用密切相关,黑人受访者使用 RPM 的可能性明显低于白人受访者(OR:0.31,P = .002)。教育程度(学士学位或以上 OR:4.79,P = .03)和较高收入(35 001 美元 + OR:4.68,P = .008)与医疗应用程序的使用密切相关。在可穿戴设备模型中,教育程度(本科或以上 OR:4.45,P = .04)和较高收入(35 001 美元 + OR:5.49,P = .01)也呈现出同样的趋势。与之前报告利用率在 50% 到 60% 之间的研究相比,我们发现经济条件较差的人群的利用率要低得多,而这些人群面临着更大的次优健康结果风险,这引起了我们更多的关注。考虑到数字健康技术模式的不断涌现,这进一步凸显了探索和解决这些健康工具的公平性障碍的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信