What Enables Implementation of Pain Management Interventions in Intensive Care Units and Why: A Realist Evaluation to Refine Program Theory.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Samira Hamadeh, Georgina Willetts, Loretta Garvey
{"title":"What Enables Implementation of Pain Management Interventions in Intensive Care Units and Why: A Realist Evaluation to Refine Program Theory.","authors":"Samira Hamadeh, Georgina Willetts, Loretta Garvey","doi":"10.1111/jan.16500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To uncover perspectives and refine 12 initial program theories concerning the implementation of pain management interventions in intensive care units. Contexts enabling implementation are delineated, and causal mechanisms within these contexts are described.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A realist evaluation approach was employed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen purposively selected Australian nurses of variant roles were virtually and individually interviewed between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with initial program theory, and their perspectives were collated. Data were analysed using an integrated approach of context (C), mechanism (M), outcome (O) categorisation coding, CMO configurations connecting and pattern matching.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Pain management interventions work if perceived to be beneficial, precise, comprehensive and fit for purpose. Nurses should be willing to change attitudes and update knowledge. Unit leaders should nurture the development of nurses' professional identity, access to learning, autonomy and self-determination. Organisations should change the infrastructure, provide resources, mitigate barriers, develop shared mental models, update evidence and institute quality assurance. Adherence to interventions is affected by the outcomes of implementation and intrinsic merits of interventions. In these contexts, confidence is boosted; feelings of empowerment, self-efficacy, reflective motivation, trust, awareness and autonomy are developed; and capacity is built. Furthermore, frustration from the variability of practices is reduced, accountability and ownership are augmented, yielding positive implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession: </strong>Findings have implications on nurses, team leaders and organisations concerned with implementation.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The findings provided a fortified understanding of conditions favouring successful implementation of pain management interventions. Actions should be undertaken at an individual, unit and organisation level to ensure successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>RAMESES II Reporting Standards for Realist Evaluations informed presentation of study.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Intensive care nurses contributed insights to refine the program theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To uncover perspectives and refine 12 initial program theories concerning the implementation of pain management interventions in intensive care units. Contexts enabling implementation are delineated, and causal mechanisms within these contexts are described.

Design: A realist evaluation approach was employed.

Methods: Fourteen purposively selected Australian nurses of variant roles were virtually and individually interviewed between July and September 2023. Participants were presented with initial program theory, and their perspectives were collated. Data were analysed using an integrated approach of context (C), mechanism (M), outcome (O) categorisation coding, CMO configurations connecting and pattern matching.

Findings: Pain management interventions work if perceived to be beneficial, precise, comprehensive and fit for purpose. Nurses should be willing to change attitudes and update knowledge. Unit leaders should nurture the development of nurses' professional identity, access to learning, autonomy and self-determination. Organisations should change the infrastructure, provide resources, mitigate barriers, develop shared mental models, update evidence and institute quality assurance. Adherence to interventions is affected by the outcomes of implementation and intrinsic merits of interventions. In these contexts, confidence is boosted; feelings of empowerment, self-efficacy, reflective motivation, trust, awareness and autonomy are developed; and capacity is built. Furthermore, frustration from the variability of practices is reduced, accountability and ownership are augmented, yielding positive implementation outcomes.

Implications for the profession: Findings have implications on nurses, team leaders and organisations concerned with implementation.

Impact: The findings provided a fortified understanding of conditions favouring successful implementation of pain management interventions. Actions should be undertaken at an individual, unit and organisation level to ensure successful implementation.

Reporting method: RAMESES II Reporting Standards for Realist Evaluations informed presentation of study.

Patient or public contribution: Intensive care nurses contributed insights to refine the program theory.

在重症监护病房实施疼痛管理干预的原因:完善计划理论的现实主义评估。
目的:揭示并完善有关在重症监护病房实施疼痛管理干预措施的 12 个初步方案理论。设计:采用现实主义评估方法:设计:采用现实主义评估方法:方法:在 2023 年 7 月至 9 月期间,有目的性地选择了 14 名不同角色的澳大利亚护士进行了虚拟访谈和个别访谈。向参与者介绍了初步的计划理论,并整理了他们的观点。采用背景(C)、机制(M)、结果(O)分类编码、CMO配置连接和模式匹配的综合方法对数据进行了分析:研究结果:如果疼痛管理干预措施被认为是有益的、准确的、全面的和符合目的的,那么这些干预措施就是有效的。护士应愿意改变态度和更新知识。科室领导应培养护士的职业认同感、学习机会、自主性和自决权。组织应改变基础设施、提供资源、减少障碍、发展共同的心理模式、更新证据并建立质量保证。坚持干预措施会受到实施结果和干预措施内在优点的影响。在这种情况下,信心会得到增强;授权感、自我效能感、反思动机、信任、意识和自主性会得到发展;能力也会得到建设。此外,还能减少因做法多变而产生的挫败感,增强责任感和主人翁精神,从而取得积极的实施成果:研究结果对护士、团队领导和与实施相关的组织都有影响:影响:研究结果加深了对成功实施疼痛管理干预措施的条件的理解。应在个人、单位和组织层面采取行动,以确保成功实施:报告方法:RAMESES II 现实主义评估报告标准为研究报告提供了依据:患者或公众的贡献:重症监护护士为完善计划理论提供了真知灼见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信