Unveiling the impact of opioid-free postoperative regimens in ureteroscopy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Bruno D Terada, Felipe G Gonçalves, Breno C Porto, Bruno Duarte Silva, Carlo C Passerotti, Rodrigo A Sanderberg, Everson L Artifon, Jose P Otoch, Jose A da Cruz
{"title":"Unveiling the impact of opioid-free postoperative regimens in ureteroscopy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bruno D Terada, Felipe G Gonçalves, Breno C Porto, Bruno Duarte Silva, Carlo C Passerotti, Rodrigo A Sanderberg, Everson L Artifon, Jose P Otoch, Jose A da Cruz","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05824-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are minimally invasive urologic procedures that are commonly used to treat kidney stones. However, they often result in significant postoperative pain. Historically, patients undergoing these surgeries have predominantly been managed with opioids, which has contributed to the escalating global complications associated with these drugs, including abuse and addiction. As a result, over the recent years, many healthcare centers have made efforts to minimize opioid use, opting instead for safer alternative medications. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of both opioid and opioid-free pain management regimens following URS or RIRS procedures.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, and Google Scholar. We included studies that compared opioid-based and opioid-free postoperative care for managing pain in patients who underwent URS or RIRS for lithotripsy. Our primary outcome of interest was the frequency of postoperative emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcomes included pain-related phone calls, postoperative unexpected encounters, need for opioids at discharge, and patients with opioid refills.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>We retrieved 10 articles, encompassing 6786 patients in the opioid group and 5276 patients in the opioid-free group. Overall, our findings lean towards favoring the opioid-free regimen, revealing notable differences between the groups. Opioid-free regimen was associated with less ED visits (OR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.77; P=0.00001; I<sup>2</sup>=0%) and required less opioids at discharge (OR=0.11; 95% CI 0.02, 0.64; P=0.01; I<sup>2</sup>=89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through statistically superior results, our meta-analysis suggests that an opioid-free regimen outperforms the use of opioids after URS or RIRS, particularly in terms of pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 5","pages":"545-553"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05824-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are minimally invasive urologic procedures that are commonly used to treat kidney stones. However, they often result in significant postoperative pain. Historically, patients undergoing these surgeries have predominantly been managed with opioids, which has contributed to the escalating global complications associated with these drugs, including abuse and addiction. As a result, over the recent years, many healthcare centers have made efforts to minimize opioid use, opting instead for safer alternative medications. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of both opioid and opioid-free pain management regimens following URS or RIRS procedures.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, and Google Scholar. We included studies that compared opioid-based and opioid-free postoperative care for managing pain in patients who underwent URS or RIRS for lithotripsy. Our primary outcome of interest was the frequency of postoperative emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcomes included pain-related phone calls, postoperative unexpected encounters, need for opioids at discharge, and patients with opioid refills.

Evidence synthesis: We retrieved 10 articles, encompassing 6786 patients in the opioid group and 5276 patients in the opioid-free group. Overall, our findings lean towards favoring the opioid-free regimen, revealing notable differences between the groups. Opioid-free regimen was associated with less ED visits (OR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.77; P=0.00001; I2=0%) and required less opioids at discharge (OR=0.11; 95% CI 0.02, 0.64; P=0.01; I2=89%).

Conclusions: Through statistically superior results, our meta-analysis suggests that an opioid-free regimen outperforms the use of opioids after URS or RIRS, particularly in terms of pain management.

揭示无阿片类药物术后方案对输尿管镜检查的影响:一项全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:输尿管镜检查(URS)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)是微创泌尿外科手术,常用于治疗肾结石。然而,这两种手术通常会导致明显的术后疼痛。一直以来,接受此类手术的患者主要使用阿片类药物,这导致与此类药物相关的全球并发症不断增加,包括滥用和成瘾。因此,近年来许多医疗中心都在努力减少阿片类药物的使用,转而使用更安全的替代药物。在本研究中,我们旨在比较 URS 或 RIRS 手术后阿片类药物和无阿片类药物疼痛治疗方案的疗效:在 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane、LILACS 和 Google Scholar 中进行了系统检索。我们纳入的研究比较了基于阿片类药物和不含阿片类药物的术后护理对接受 URS 或 RIRS 碎石术患者疼痛的控制效果。我们关注的主要结果是术后急诊科(ED)就诊频率。次要结果包括与疼痛相关的电话、术后意外情况、出院时对阿片类药物的需求以及阿片类药物续药患者:我们检索了 10 篇文章,包括阿片类药物组的 6786 名患者和无阿片类药物组的 5276 名患者。总体而言,我们的研究结果倾向于无阿片治疗方案,并揭示了两组之间的显著差异。无阿片方案与较少的急诊就诊相关(OR=0.67;95% CI:0.58,0.77;P=0.00001;I2=0%),出院时所需阿片类药物较少(OR=0.11;95% CI 0.02,0.64;P=0.01;I2=89%):我们的荟萃分析结果表明,不使用阿片类药物的治疗方案优于 URS 或 RIRS 后使用阿片类药物的治疗方案,尤其是在疼痛治疗方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信