Preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based risk stratification system for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
Cagri Akpinar , Digdem Kuru Oz , Alkan Oktar , Furkan Ozsoy , Eriz Ozden , Nuray Haliloglu , Muhammed Arif Ibis , Evren Suer , Sumer Baltaci
{"title":"Preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based risk stratification system for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy","authors":"Cagri Akpinar , Digdem Kuru Oz , Alkan Oktar , Furkan Ozsoy , Eriz Ozden , Nuray Haliloglu , Muhammed Arif Ibis , Evren Suer , Sumer Baltaci","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is used as a current marker in preoperative staging and surgical decision-making, but current evidence on predicting post-surgical oncological outcomes based on preoperative mpMRI findings is limited. In this study We aimed to develop a risk classification based on mpMRI and mpMRI-derived biopsy findings to predict early biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between January 2017 and January 2023, the data of 289 patients who underwent mpMRI, transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive and fusion targeted biopsies, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection in a single center were retrospectively re-evaluated. BCR was defined as a prostate specific-antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL at least twice after RP. Multivariate logistic regression models tested the predictors of BCR. The regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative mpMRI characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-derived area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used to test the accuracy of the regression tree–derived risk stratification tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>BCR was detected in 47 patients (16.2 %) at a median follow-up of 24 months. In mpMRI based multivariate analyses, the maximum diameter of the index lesion (HR 1.081, 95%Cl 1.015–1.151, p = 0.015) the presence of PI-RADS 5 lesions (HR 2.604, 95%Cl 1.043–6.493, p = 0.04), ≥iT3a stage (HR 2.403, 95%Cl 1.013–5.714, p = 0.046) and ISUP grade ≥4 on biopsy (HR 2.440, 95%Cl 1.123–5.301, p = 0.024) were independent predictors of BCR. In regression tree analysis, patients were stratified into three risk groups: maximum diameter of index lesion, biopsy ISUP grade, and clinical stage on mpMRI. The regression tree–derived risk stratification model had moderate-good accuracy in predicting early BCR (AUC 77 %)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Straightforward mpMRI and mpMRI-derived biopsy-based risk stratification for BCR prediction provide an additional clinical predictive model to the currently available pathological risk tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096074042400118X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is used as a current marker in preoperative staging and surgical decision-making, but current evidence on predicting post-surgical oncological outcomes based on preoperative mpMRI findings is limited. In this study We aimed to develop a risk classification based on mpMRI and mpMRI-derived biopsy findings to predict early biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy.
Methods
Between January 2017 and January 2023, the data of 289 patients who underwent mpMRI, transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive and fusion targeted biopsies, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection in a single center were retrospectively re-evaluated. BCR was defined as a prostate specific-antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL at least twice after RP. Multivariate logistic regression models tested the predictors of BCR. The regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative mpMRI characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-derived area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used to test the accuracy of the regression tree–derived risk stratification tool.
Results
BCR was detected in 47 patients (16.2 %) at a median follow-up of 24 months. In mpMRI based multivariate analyses, the maximum diameter of the index lesion (HR 1.081, 95%Cl 1.015–1.151, p = 0.015) the presence of PI-RADS 5 lesions (HR 2.604, 95%Cl 1.043–6.493, p = 0.04), ≥iT3a stage (HR 2.403, 95%Cl 1.013–5.714, p = 0.046) and ISUP grade ≥4 on biopsy (HR 2.440, 95%Cl 1.123–5.301, p = 0.024) were independent predictors of BCR. In regression tree analysis, patients were stratified into three risk groups: maximum diameter of index lesion, biopsy ISUP grade, and clinical stage on mpMRI. The regression tree–derived risk stratification model had moderate-good accuracy in predicting early BCR (AUC 77 %)
Conclusion
Straightforward mpMRI and mpMRI-derived biopsy-based risk stratification for BCR prediction provide an additional clinical predictive model to the currently available pathological risk tools.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.