Pharmacokinetic model-guided enoxaparin dosing in the Neonatal ICU: Retrospective cohort study to plan for prospective feasibility trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Haden Bunn, Catherine Schentag, Leonardo R Brandão, Vijay Ivaturi, Tamorah Lewis
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic model-guided enoxaparin dosing in the Neonatal ICU: Retrospective cohort study to plan for prospective feasibility trial.","authors":"Haden Bunn, Catherine Schentag, Leonardo R Brandão, Vijay Ivaturi, Tamorah Lewis","doi":"10.1111/cts.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) dosing of enoxaparin in neonates frequently fails to achieve target anti-Xa levels promptly, necessitating repeated laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. This study investigated whether a personalized dosing strategy based on predicted individual clearance and volume of distribution could improve outcomes, comparing standard-of-care (SOC) mg/kg dosing to pharmacokinetic (PK) model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). A retrospective analysis was conducted on hospitalized neonates treated with enoxaparin at less than 44 weeks postmenstrual age from 2019 to 2022. Data on demographics, drug dosing, PK model covariates, and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic health records and analyzed using the Pumas-AI Lyv dosing tool. The primary focus was on comparing the initial SOC dose to the MIPD-recommended dose. The secondary outcome measured was the time required to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The study included 168 neonates with a median postnatal age of 15 days (range 1-149) and a median dosing weight of 3.1 kg (range: 0.82-5.2). MIPD-recommended initial doses were 20%-60% higher than SOC doses in 32% of the cases and over 60% higher in 11% of cases. Neonates who received SOC doses that were much lower than the MIPD recommendation showed the longest delays in reaching therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The results indicate that PK model-informed of enoxaparin dosing leads to higher initial dosages than SOC in neonates, potentially reducing the time to therapeutic anti-Xa levels. These findings are being utilized to define dosing limits for a prospective trial of MIPD in neonatal intensive care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) dosing of enoxaparin in neonates frequently fails to achieve target anti-Xa levels promptly, necessitating repeated laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. This study investigated whether a personalized dosing strategy based on predicted individual clearance and volume of distribution could improve outcomes, comparing standard-of-care (SOC) mg/kg dosing to pharmacokinetic (PK) model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). A retrospective analysis was conducted on hospitalized neonates treated with enoxaparin at less than 44 weeks postmenstrual age from 2019 to 2022. Data on demographics, drug dosing, PK model covariates, and clinical outcomes were extracted from electronic health records and analyzed using the Pumas-AI Lyv dosing tool. The primary focus was on comparing the initial SOC dose to the MIPD-recommended dose. The secondary outcome measured was the time required to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The study included 168 neonates with a median postnatal age of 15 days (range 1-149) and a median dosing weight of 3.1 kg (range: 0.82-5.2). MIPD-recommended initial doses were 20%-60% higher than SOC doses in 32% of the cases and over 60% higher in 11% of cases. Neonates who received SOC doses that were much lower than the MIPD recommendation showed the longest delays in reaching therapeutic anti-Xa levels. The results indicate that PK model-informed of enoxaparin dosing leads to higher initial dosages than SOC in neonates, potentially reducing the time to therapeutic anti-Xa levels. These findings are being utilized to define dosing limits for a prospective trial of MIPD in neonatal intensive care settings.

新生儿重症监护室中以药代动力学模型为指导的依诺肝素剂量:回顾性队列研究,为前瞻性可行性试验制定计划。
新生儿服用依诺肝素的传统毫克/公斤剂量经常无法及时达到目标抗 Xa 水平,因此需要反复进行实验室监测和剂量调整。本研究比较了标准护理(SOC)毫克/千克剂量与药代动力学(PK)模型指导的精确剂量(MIPD),探讨了基于预测的个体清除率和分布容积的个性化剂量策略能否改善疗效。我们对2019年至2022年月经后44周以内接受依诺肝素治疗的住院新生儿进行了回顾性分析。从电子病历中提取了有关人口统计学、药物剂量、PK 模型协变量和临床结果的数据,并使用 Pumas-AI Lyv 剂量工具进行了分析。主要重点是比较初始 SOC 剂量与 MIPD 推荐剂量。测量的次要结果是达到治疗性抗 Xa 水平所需的时间。该研究纳入了 168 名新生儿,中位产后年龄为 15 天(范围为 1-149),中位用药体重为 3.1 千克(范围为 0.82-5.2)。在 32% 的病例中,MIPD 推荐的初始剂量比 SOC 剂量高出 20%-60%,11% 的病例高出 60% 以上。接受 SOC 剂量远低于 MIPD 推荐剂量的新生儿在达到治疗性抗 Xa 水平方面的延迟时间最长。研究结果表明,以 PK 模型为依据的依诺肝素剂量会导致新生儿的初始剂量高于 SOC,从而有可能缩短达到治疗性抗 Xa 水平的时间。目前正在利用这些发现为新生儿重症监护环境中的 MIPD 前瞻性试验确定剂量限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信