Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: Analysis of 253,845 Patients From 2002 - 2021.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Meghamsh Kanuparthy, Srikur Kanuparthy, Dwight D Harris, Mark Broadwin, Christopher Stone, Abbas E Abbas, Frank W Sellke
{"title":"Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: Analysis of 253,845 Patients From 2002 - 2021.","authors":"Meghamsh Kanuparthy, Srikur Kanuparthy, Dwight D Harris, Mark Broadwin, Christopher Stone, Abbas E Abbas, Frank W Sellke","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lung cancer remains the largest cause of cancer-related death, and multiple large studies have identified persistent racial disparities in lung cancer outcomes. In this study, we utilize public recording of lung cancer data on clinicaltrials.gov to sample age, gender, racial, and ethnic characteristics of participants in lung cancer clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, a US federal government repository of clinical trials was queried for the term \"lung cancer\" and several other related terms. A list of all studies matching these criteria was generated and information regarding age, gender, ethnicity, and racial breakdown of participants was analyzed. Studies that did not report results to clinicaltrials.gov or had at least one non-US site were excluded. Hypothesis testing was performed with Student's T-test and Chi-squared testing. Trends were analyzed using Spearman testing in Python (VS Code, Microsoft, Redmond, WA 2023) RESULTS: Rates of minority (non-white) and female participation in US lung cancer clinical trials have exhibited a significant increase (p<0.01) over the last 20 years (2002-2021, Figures 1) but still do not represent parity with lung cancer incidence. Subset analysis by offered intervention did not show a significant difference between studies that offered surgical or non-invasive intervention in race, gender, or ethnic participation. NIH-funded studies do not appear to have recruited any Hispanic participants as assessed by reporting on clinicaltrials.gov. The rates of race and ethnicity reporting have also significantly increased over the last 20 years (Figure 1C).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrate that there are persistent but improving racial and ethnic disparities in lung cancer clinical trials. Limitations of this study include poor reporting of results on clinicaltrials.gov. These findings demonstrate significant progress in the recruitment of minority participation, but also identify a significant role for policy changes to align participation with lung cancer incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lung cancer remains the largest cause of cancer-related death, and multiple large studies have identified persistent racial disparities in lung cancer outcomes. In this study, we utilize public recording of lung cancer data on clinicaltrials.gov to sample age, gender, racial, and ethnic characteristics of participants in lung cancer clinical trials.

Methods: Clinicaltrials.gov, a US federal government repository of clinical trials was queried for the term "lung cancer" and several other related terms. A list of all studies matching these criteria was generated and information regarding age, gender, ethnicity, and racial breakdown of participants was analyzed. Studies that did not report results to clinicaltrials.gov or had at least one non-US site were excluded. Hypothesis testing was performed with Student's T-test and Chi-squared testing. Trends were analyzed using Spearman testing in Python (VS Code, Microsoft, Redmond, WA 2023) RESULTS: Rates of minority (non-white) and female participation in US lung cancer clinical trials have exhibited a significant increase (p<0.01) over the last 20 years (2002-2021, Figures 1) but still do not represent parity with lung cancer incidence. Subset analysis by offered intervention did not show a significant difference between studies that offered surgical or non-invasive intervention in race, gender, or ethnic participation. NIH-funded studies do not appear to have recruited any Hispanic participants as assessed by reporting on clinicaltrials.gov. The rates of race and ethnicity reporting have also significantly increased over the last 20 years (Figure 1C).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that there are persistent but improving racial and ethnic disparities in lung cancer clinical trials. Limitations of this study include poor reporting of results on clinicaltrials.gov. These findings demonstrate significant progress in the recruitment of minority participation, but also identify a significant role for policy changes to align participation with lung cancer incidence.

肺癌临床试验参与中的性别、种族和民族:2002-2021年253,845名患者的分析。
目的:肺癌仍然是癌症相关死亡的最大原因,多项大型研究发现肺癌结果中持续存在种族差异。在本研究中,我们利用临床试验网(clinicaltrials.gov)上公开记录的肺癌数据,对肺癌临床试验参与者的年龄、性别、种族和民族特征进行抽样调查:我们在 Clinicaltrials.gov 这个美国联邦政府的临床试验资料库中查询了 "肺癌 "和其他几个相关术语。我们生成了一份符合这些标准的所有研究清单,并对参与者的年龄、性别、民族和种族分类信息进行了分析。未向 clinicaltrials.gov 报告结果或至少有一个研究地点不在美国的研究被排除在外。假设检验采用学生 T 检验和卡方检验。用 Python(VS Code,Microsoft,Redmond,WA 2023)中的斯皮尔曼检验对趋势进行了分析。 结果:少数族裔(非白人)和女性参与美国肺癌临床试验的比率有了显著增加(p结论:我们的数据表明,肺癌临床试验中的种族和民族差异持续存在,但在不断改善。本研究的局限性包括clinicaltrials.gov上的结果报告较少。这些研究结果表明,在招募少数族裔参与方面取得了重大进展,但同时也指出了政策改革的重要作用,即根据肺癌发病率调整参与情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信