Andreas Seas, Tanner J Zachem, Bruno Valan, Christine Goertz, Shiva Nischal, Sully F Chen, David Sykes, Troy Q Tabarestani, Benjamin D Wissel, Elizabeth R Blackwood, Christopher Holland, Oren Gottfried, Christopher I Shaffrey, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
{"title":"Machine learning in the diagnosis, management, and care of patients with low back pain: a scoping review of the literature and future directions.","authors":"Andreas Seas, Tanner J Zachem, Bruno Valan, Christine Goertz, Shiva Nischal, Sully F Chen, David Sykes, Troy Q Tabarestani, Benjamin D Wissel, Elizabeth R Blackwood, Christopher Holland, Oren Gottfried, Christopher I Shaffrey, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) remains the leading cause of disability globally. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a potentially useful tool to aid the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of LBP.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In this review, we assess the scope of ML applications in the LBP literature and outline gaps and opportunities.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles were extracted from the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore databases. Title/abstract and full-text screening was performed by two reviewers. Data on model type, model inputs, predicted outcomes, and ML methods were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 223 unique studies published between 1988 and 2023 were identified, with just over 50% focused on low-back-pain detection. Neural networks were used in 106 of these articles. Common inputs included patient history, demographics, and lab values (67% total). Articles published after 2010 were also likely to incorporate imaging data into their models (41.7% of articles). Of the 212 supervised learning articles identified, 168 (79.4%) mentioned use of a training or testing dataset, 116 (54.7%) utilized cross-validation, and 46 (21.7%) implemented hyperparameter optimization. Of all articles, only 8 included external validation and 9 had publicly available code.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the rapid application of ML in LBP research, a majority of articles do not follow standard ML best practices. Furthermore, over 95% of articles cannot be reproduced or authenticated due to lack of code availability. Increased collaboration and code sharing are needed to support future growth and implementation of ML in the care of patients with LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"18-31"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background context: Low back pain (LBP) remains the leading cause of disability globally. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a potentially useful tool to aid the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of LBP.
Purpose: In this review, we assess the scope of ML applications in the LBP literature and outline gaps and opportunities.
Study design/setting: A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
Methods: Articles were extracted from the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore databases. Title/abstract and full-text screening was performed by two reviewers. Data on model type, model inputs, predicted outcomes, and ML methods were collected.
Results: In total, 223 unique studies published between 1988 and 2023 were identified, with just over 50% focused on low-back-pain detection. Neural networks were used in 106 of these articles. Common inputs included patient history, demographics, and lab values (67% total). Articles published after 2010 were also likely to incorporate imaging data into their models (41.7% of articles). Of the 212 supervised learning articles identified, 168 (79.4%) mentioned use of a training or testing dataset, 116 (54.7%) utilized cross-validation, and 46 (21.7%) implemented hyperparameter optimization. Of all articles, only 8 included external validation and 9 had publicly available code.
Conclusions: Despite the rapid application of ML in LBP research, a majority of articles do not follow standard ML best practices. Furthermore, over 95% of articles cannot be reproduced or authenticated due to lack of code availability. Increased collaboration and code sharing are needed to support future growth and implementation of ML in the care of patients with LBP.
机器学习在腰背痛患者诊断、管理和护理中的应用:文献综述与未来方向》(Machine Learning in the Diagnosis, Management, and Care of Patients with Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review of the Literature and Future Directions.
背景情况:腰背痛(LBP)仍然是全球致残的主要原因。近年来,机器学习(ML)已成为辅助腰背痛诊断、管理和预后的潜在有用工具。目的:在本综述中,我们评估了ML在腰背痛文献中的应用范围,并概述了差距和机遇:研究设计/背景:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)指南进行了范围界定综述:从 Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed 和 IEEE Xplore 数据库中提取文章。由两名审稿人对文章标题/摘要和全文进行筛选。收集了有关模型类型、模型输入、预测结果和 ML 方法的数据:结果:总共发现了 223 项发表于 1988-2023 年间的独特研究,其中略高于 50%的研究侧重于低背痛检测。其中 106 篇文章使用了神经网络。常见的输入包括患者病史、人口统计学和化验值(共占 67%)。2010 年之后发表的文章也有可能将成像数据纳入其模型中(41.7% 的文章)。在确定的 212 篇监督学习文章中,168 篇(79.4%)提到使用了训练或测试数据集,116 篇(54.7%)使用了交叉验证,46 篇(21.7%)实施了超参数优化。在所有文章中,只有 8 篇文章包含外部验证,9 篇文章有公开代码:尽管人工智能在枸杞多糖研究中应用迅速,但大多数文章并没有遵循标准的人工智能最佳实践。此外,由于缺乏可用代码,超过 95% 的文章无法复制或验证。需要加强合作和代码共享,以支持ML在枸杞多糖症患者护理中的未来发展和实施。
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.