Mechanics guided data-driven model for seismic shear strength of exterior beam-column joints

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
{"title":"Mechanics guided data-driven model for seismic shear strength of exterior beam-column joints","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an enhanced predictive model for the seismic shear strength of exterior beam-column joints (BCJs). Initially, the principles of strut-and-tie mechanism and variable selection procedures were first utilized to identify the most influential parameters. Subsequently, an evolutionary algorithm, specifically multigene genetic programming (MGGP), was utilized to search for the near-optimal predictive model. The dataset used to develop, train, and test the proposed model was compiled from previously published tests, focusing specifically on cyclically loaded exterior BCJs that encountered shear and flexure -shear failures. The prediction performance of the developed model was assessed through various statistical measures, and then compared with that of other existing models. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify the influence and importance of each design parameter. The results demonstrated that the methodology employed in this study yielded an elegant model that adheres to the underlying mechanics and provides higher prediction accuracy compared to existing models. Furthermore, the sensitivity analyses showed that BCJ shear strength positively correlates with concrete compressive strength, beam reinforcement, joint transverse reinforcement, column intermediate vertical reinforcement, and axial load ratio, while it negatively correlates with the joint aspect ratio. Among these design parameters, beam reinforcement has the greatest influence on the model response, followed by concrete compressive strength. Conversely, column intermediate vertical reinforcement and axial load ratio have the least impact on the model response. The notable prediction capabilities and robustness demonstrated by the developed model render it an efficient design tool with promising potentials for adoption by practicing engineers and for consideration in design guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424014723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents an enhanced predictive model for the seismic shear strength of exterior beam-column joints (BCJs). Initially, the principles of strut-and-tie mechanism and variable selection procedures were first utilized to identify the most influential parameters. Subsequently, an evolutionary algorithm, specifically multigene genetic programming (MGGP), was utilized to search for the near-optimal predictive model. The dataset used to develop, train, and test the proposed model was compiled from previously published tests, focusing specifically on cyclically loaded exterior BCJs that encountered shear and flexure -shear failures. The prediction performance of the developed model was assessed through various statistical measures, and then compared with that of other existing models. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were also performed to identify the influence and importance of each design parameter. The results demonstrated that the methodology employed in this study yielded an elegant model that adheres to the underlying mechanics and provides higher prediction accuracy compared to existing models. Furthermore, the sensitivity analyses showed that BCJ shear strength positively correlates with concrete compressive strength, beam reinforcement, joint transverse reinforcement, column intermediate vertical reinforcement, and axial load ratio, while it negatively correlates with the joint aspect ratio. Among these design parameters, beam reinforcement has the greatest influence on the model response, followed by concrete compressive strength. Conversely, column intermediate vertical reinforcement and axial load ratio have the least impact on the model response. The notable prediction capabilities and robustness demonstrated by the developed model render it an efficient design tool with promising potentials for adoption by practicing engineers and for consideration in design guidelines.
外部梁柱连接处抗震剪切强度的力学数据驱动模型
本研究针对外部梁柱连接(BCJ)的抗震剪切强度提出了一种增强型预测模型。首先,研究人员利用支撑-拉杆机制原理和变量选择程序来确定影响最大的参数。随后,利用进化算法,特别是多基因遗传编程(MGGP),寻找接近最优的预测模型。用于开发、训练和测试所提模型的数据集是根据以前公布的测试结果编制的,特别侧重于遭遇剪切和挠剪失效的循环加载外部 BCJ。开发模型的预测性能通过各种统计量进行评估,然后与其他现有模型进行比较。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以确定每个设计参数的影响和重要性。结果表明,本研究采用的方法产生了一个符合基本力学原理的优雅模型,与现有模型相比,预测精度更高。此外,敏感性分析表明,BCJ 抗剪强度与混凝土抗压强度、梁配筋、连接横向配筋、柱中间竖向配筋和轴荷载比呈正相关,而与连接长宽比呈负相关。在这些设计参数中,梁配筋对模型响应的影响最大,其次是混凝土抗压强度。相反,柱中间垂直配筋和轴荷载比对模型响应的影响最小。所开发的模型具有显著的预测能力和稳健性,是一种高效的设计工具,有望被工程师采用并纳入设计指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信