Jun Zhuang , Hengyuan Ma , Cheng Wang , Xiangting Kong , Yi Chen , Xueshang Su , Ziming Zhang , Qingqian Wei , Liya Jiang , Jintian Hu
{"title":"Applying 3D scanning to evaluate facial symmetry in Asian populations","authors":"Jun Zhuang , Hengyuan Ma , Cheng Wang , Xiangting Kong , Yi Chen , Xueshang Su , Ziming Zhang , Qingqian Wei , Liya Jiang , Jintian Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Facial symmetry enhances attractiveness, with various therapies available to improve it. However, trends in facial asymmetry remain unclear. This study evaluates the differences between specific facial regions using 3D scanning to guide clinical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The 3dMD face™ system (3dMD Ltd, USA) scanned the faces of 88 participants. Geomagic Wrap 2021 analyzed the left and right sides. Differences in the eyebrow peaks, eyebrow tails, eye ends, and mouth corners were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Several participants showed a drooping right side of the face in the eyebrow peaks, eyebrow tails, eye ends, mouth corners, tubercula mentale, and mandibular margin positions. A higher proportion had deeper left nasolabial folds and marionette lines, whereas several others had deeper right tear ducts and lateral chin depressions. Several participants exhibited prominent right forehead and parotid masseter region, with prominent left temporal and cheek regions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>3D scanning effectively assesses facial asymmetry in clinical practice. Research indicates significant differences in asymmetry between the facial regions. Evaluating these differences pre-treatment can guide the selection of therapeutic methods to improve facial asymmetry.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>3 (Diagnostic).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"99 ","pages":"Pages 11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Facial symmetry enhances attractiveness, with various therapies available to improve it. However, trends in facial asymmetry remain unclear. This study evaluates the differences between specific facial regions using 3D scanning to guide clinical treatment.
Method
The 3dMD face™ system (3dMD Ltd, USA) scanned the faces of 88 participants. Geomagic Wrap 2021 analyzed the left and right sides. Differences in the eyebrow peaks, eyebrow tails, eye ends, and mouth corners were evaluated.
Results
Several participants showed a drooping right side of the face in the eyebrow peaks, eyebrow tails, eye ends, mouth corners, tubercula mentale, and mandibular margin positions. A higher proportion had deeper left nasolabial folds and marionette lines, whereas several others had deeper right tear ducts and lateral chin depressions. Several participants exhibited prominent right forehead and parotid masseter region, with prominent left temporal and cheek regions.
Conclusion
3D scanning effectively assesses facial asymmetry in clinical practice. Research indicates significant differences in asymmetry between the facial regions. Evaluating these differences pre-treatment can guide the selection of therapeutic methods to improve facial asymmetry.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.