Reassessment of a theropod ilium from the Kem Kem beds of Morocco and the evolution of ilia in Spinosauridae

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY
Adun Samathi
{"title":"Reassessment of a theropod ilium from the Kem Kem beds of Morocco and the evolution of ilia in Spinosauridae","authors":"Adun Samathi","doi":"10.1016/j.cretres.2024.106007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A theropod ilium MHNM KK04 from the Kem Kem Beds (Cenomanian) of Morocco was originally described as an abelisaurid. It is here reinterpreted as a spinosaurine spinosaurid. The phylogenetic relationships of MHNM KK04 were analyzed. A thorough and careful comparison between spinosaurids and abelisaurids was made. The Kem Kem ilium was identified as a spinosaurid based on the similarity to the <em>Spinosaurus aegyptiacus</em> neotype and the MSNM V6900 specimen (i.e., the lateral wall of brevis fossa is taller than the medial wall, the ventral margin of the postacetabular blade is straight, and the ventral margin of postacetabular process is posteroventrally oriented). However, MHNM KK04 is slightly different from the ilium of the <em>Spinosaurus aegyptiacus</em> neotype (i.e., the ilium dorsal margin is sub-horizontal to slightly anteriorly inclined, the dorsoventral height of the iliac blade at the postacetabular portion is approximately the same size as the blade height above the acetabulum, and the postacetabulum length is slightly longer than the ischial peduncle length). MHNM KK04, together with previous studies, shows that there were at least two morphotypes of spinosaurines in the Late Cretaceous of Kem Kem beds. Nevertheless, taphonomy, intraspecific or ontogenetic variation cannot be ruled out in the present work. This reclassification adds to the number of juvenile spinosaurines from the Kem Kem beds and provided evidence on the evolution of ilia in spinosaurids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55207,"journal":{"name":"Cretaceous Research","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 106007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cretaceous Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667124001800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A theropod ilium MHNM KK04 from the Kem Kem Beds (Cenomanian) of Morocco was originally described as an abelisaurid. It is here reinterpreted as a spinosaurine spinosaurid. The phylogenetic relationships of MHNM KK04 were analyzed. A thorough and careful comparison between spinosaurids and abelisaurids was made. The Kem Kem ilium was identified as a spinosaurid based on the similarity to the Spinosaurus aegyptiacus neotype and the MSNM V6900 specimen (i.e., the lateral wall of brevis fossa is taller than the medial wall, the ventral margin of the postacetabular blade is straight, and the ventral margin of postacetabular process is posteroventrally oriented). However, MHNM KK04 is slightly different from the ilium of the Spinosaurus aegyptiacus neotype (i.e., the ilium dorsal margin is sub-horizontal to slightly anteriorly inclined, the dorsoventral height of the iliac blade at the postacetabular portion is approximately the same size as the blade height above the acetabulum, and the postacetabulum length is slightly longer than the ischial peduncle length). MHNM KK04, together with previous studies, shows that there were at least two morphotypes of spinosaurines in the Late Cretaceous of Kem Kem beds. Nevertheless, taphonomy, intraspecific or ontogenetic variation cannot be ruled out in the present work. This reclassification adds to the number of juvenile spinosaurines from the Kem Kem beds and provided evidence on the evolution of ilia in spinosaurids.
重新评估摩洛哥凯姆凯姆地层中的兽脚类髂骨以及棘龙科髂骨的演化
摩洛哥凯姆凯姆床层(仙人掌纪)出土的一个兽脚类髂骨 MHNM KK04 最初被描述为abelisaurid。本文将其重新解释为棘龙类。对 MHNM KK04 的系统发育关系进行了分析。对棘龙类与非贝类进行了全面细致的比较。根据 Kem Kem 髂骨与 Spinosaurus aegyptiacus 新原型和 MSNM V6900 标本的相似性(即前窝外侧壁比内侧壁高、髋后叶腹缘平直、髋后突腹缘后向),Kem Kem 髂骨被鉴定为棘龙类。然而,MHNM KK04 与埃及棘龙(Spinosaurus aegyptiacus)新原型的髂骨略有不同(即髂骨背缘近水平至略微前倾,髋臼后部的髂骨叶背腹高度与髋臼上方的叶片高度大致相同,髋臼后部的长度略长于峡梗长度)。MHNM KK04 和之前的研究表明,在肯肯岩床的晚白垩世至少存在两种形态的棘龙。尽管如此,本次研究仍不能排除陶器学、种内或本体变异等因素。这次重新分类增加了凯姆凯姆床棘龙类幼体的数量,并为棘龙类髂骨的演化提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cretaceous Research
Cretaceous Research 地学-地质学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cretaceous Research provides a forum for the rapid publication of research on all aspects of the Cretaceous Period, including its boundaries with the Jurassic and Palaeogene. Authoritative papers reporting detailed investigations of Cretaceous stratigraphy and palaeontology, studies of regional geology, and reviews of recently published books are complemented by short communications of significant new findings. Papers submitted to Cretaceous Research should place the research in a broad context, with emphasis placed towards our better understanding of the Cretaceous, that are therefore of interest to the diverse, international readership of the journal. Full length papers that focus solely on a local theme or area will not be accepted for publication; authors of short communications are encouraged to discuss how their findings are of relevance to the Cretaceous on a broad scale. Research Areas include: • Regional geology • Stratigraphy and palaeontology • Palaeobiology • Palaeobiogeography • Palaeoceanography • Palaeoclimatology • Evolutionary Palaeoecology • Geochronology • Global events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信