Reference alternatives based knockout-tournament procedure for ranking and selection

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Ying Zhong , Jianzhong Du , Deng-Feng Li , Zhaolin Hu
{"title":"Reference alternatives based knockout-tournament procedure for ranking and selection","authors":"Ying Zhong ,&nbsp;Jianzhong Du ,&nbsp;Deng-Feng Li ,&nbsp;Zhaolin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The knockout-tournament (<span><math><mi>KT</mi></math></span>) procedure is an efficient parallel procedure recently developed to solve large-scale ranking and selection (R&amp;S) problems. The procedure adopts a selection structure which is commonly used in many sports tournaments, and eliminates alternatives by conducting “matches” between paired alternatives round-by-round. In this paper, to further improve the procedure’s performance in solving large-scale problems, we propose a major modification of the procedure. Specifically, in each round of the selection, before pairing the surviving alternatives and conducting the matches, we first choose an alternative as the reference alternative and then add the reference alternative to each match. We call the new procedure Procedure <span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>KT</mi></math></span>, where <span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>KT</mi></math></span> stands for “improved knockout-tournament”. We show that by carefully choosing the reference alternative and designing the pairing scheme for the remaining surviving alternatives in each round of the selection, Procedure <span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>KT</mi></math></span> can achieve significant improvements on both the average sample size required in each match and the total number of matches required during the entire selection process. In the meantime, we demonstrate that after the modifications, Procedure <span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>KT</mi></math></span> still fits parallel computing environments well. We compare Procedure <span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>-<span><math><mi>KT</mi></math></span> with various procedures on different test examples and numerically justify our theoretical analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172400688X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knockout-tournament (KT) procedure is an efficient parallel procedure recently developed to solve large-scale ranking and selection (R&S) problems. The procedure adopts a selection structure which is commonly used in many sports tournaments, and eliminates alternatives by conducting “matches” between paired alternatives round-by-round. In this paper, to further improve the procedure’s performance in solving large-scale problems, we propose a major modification of the procedure. Specifically, in each round of the selection, before pairing the surviving alternatives and conducting the matches, we first choose an alternative as the reference alternative and then add the reference alternative to each match. We call the new procedure Procedure i-KT, where i-KT stands for “improved knockout-tournament”. We show that by carefully choosing the reference alternative and designing the pairing scheme for the remaining surviving alternatives in each round of the selection, Procedure i-KT can achieve significant improvements on both the average sample size required in each match and the total number of matches required during the entire selection process. In the meantime, we demonstrate that after the modifications, Procedure i-KT still fits parallel computing environments well. We compare Procedure i-KT with various procedures on different test examples and numerically justify our theoretical analysis.
基于淘汰赛程序的参考替代品排名和遴选
淘汰赛(KT)程序是最近为解决大规模排名和选择(R&S)问题而开发的一种高效并行程序。该程序采用了许多体育比赛中常用的选择结构,通过在配对的备选方案之间逐轮进行 "比赛 "来淘汰备选方案。在本文中,为了进一步提高该程序在解决大规模问题时的性能,我们对该程序提出了一项重大修改。具体来说,在每一轮选择中,在将存活的备选方案配对并进行匹配之前,我们首先选择一个备选方案作为参考备选方案,然后将参考备选方案添加到每次匹配中。我们将这一新程序称为 "i-KT 程序",i-KT 代表 "改进的淘汰赛"。我们的研究表明,通过精心选择参考备选方案,并为每轮遴选中剩余的幸存备选方案设计配对方案,程序 i-KT 可以显著改善每场比赛所需的平均样本量和整个遴选过程中所需的比赛总数。同时,我们还证明了经过修改后,程序 i-KT 仍能很好地适应并行计算环境。我们在不同的测试实例中比较了程序 i-KT和各种程序,并从数值上证明了我们的理论分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Operational Research
European Journal of Operational Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
786
审稿时长
8.2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信