{"title":"Definitive particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for dedifferentiated liposarcoma","authors":"Hikaru Kubota , Yusuke Demizu , Kazuma Iwashita , Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu , Daiki Takahashi , SungChul Park , Shintaro Tsuruoka , Yoshiro Matsuo , Kazuki Terashima , Sunao Tokumaru , Tomoaki Okimoto , Toshinori Soejima","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Particle therapy is effective for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, the clinical outcomes of definitive particle therapy, particularly for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), remain unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To analyze the treatment outcomes of proton and carbon ion particle therapies for DDLS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included patients with DDLS who were treated with particle therapy between 2008 and 2022. The local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 68 years (range, 36–91 years). The most common tumor site was the retroperitoneum (n = 37), with a median gross tumor volume (GTV) of 181 cm<sup>3</sup>. Twenty-nine patients received proton therapy, and 28 patients received carbon ion therapy. The most common fractionation dose was 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 32 fractions (72.7 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]). The median follow-up time was 33 months (range, 1–128 months). The 3-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 73.1 %, 44.6 %, and 70.6 %, respectively. Patients who received a higher prescribed dose (≥72.7 Gy EQD2) showed significantly better LC (p = 0.04) than did those who received a lower prescribed dose. Moreover, those with a larger GTV (≥181 cm<sup>3</sup>) had significantly worse OS (p = 0.04) than did those with a smaller GTV. Late adverse events occurred in five (9 %) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for the treatment of DDLS is safe and provides good OS and LC. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger cohorts are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Particle therapy is effective for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, the clinical outcomes of definitive particle therapy, particularly for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), remain unknown.
Purpose
To analyze the treatment outcomes of proton and carbon ion particle therapies for DDLS.
Methods
We retrospectively included patients with DDLS who were treated with particle therapy between 2008 and 2022. The local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.
Results
Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 68 years (range, 36–91 years). The most common tumor site was the retroperitoneum (n = 37), with a median gross tumor volume (GTV) of 181 cm3. Twenty-nine patients received proton therapy, and 28 patients received carbon ion therapy. The most common fractionation dose was 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 32 fractions (72.7 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]). The median follow-up time was 33 months (range, 1–128 months). The 3-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 73.1 %, 44.6 %, and 70.6 %, respectively. Patients who received a higher prescribed dose (≥72.7 Gy EQD2) showed significantly better LC (p = 0.04) than did those who received a lower prescribed dose. Moreover, those with a larger GTV (≥181 cm3) had significantly worse OS (p = 0.04) than did those with a smaller GTV. Late adverse events occurred in five (9 %) patients.
Conclusions
Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for the treatment of DDLS is safe and provides good OS and LC. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger cohorts are warranted.