“Our town is dying:“ Exploring utility-scale and rooftop solar energy injustices in Southeastern California

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Alexander A. Dunlap , Benjamin K. Sovacool , Bojana Novakovic
{"title":"“Our town is dying:“ Exploring utility-scale and rooftop solar energy injustices in Southeastern California","authors":"Alexander A. Dunlap ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Sovacool ,&nbsp;Bojana Novakovic","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Desert ecosystems have experienced an intensive and increasingly rapid integration of solar energy projects into their landscapes. The social and ecological impact of solar energy is particularly pronounced in California, given aggressive state targets to decarbonize its electricity grid. Between 2010 and 2024, more than 230 utility-scale solar projects have been sited in the Mojave and Colorado deserts, which excludes the deployment of rooftop solar systems on residences. This article explores lived experiences of people who live among intensive solar development around the community of Blythe, California. While solar energy is regarded as a “clean,” socially just and democratic technology, the practical and intensive development of solar energy has sobering and deleterious results on the community and natural environment there. This article demonstrates how solar energy development entrenches inequality, perpetuates racism and continues a trajectory of ecological degradation. It includes material and ecological harm, but also issues of aggravated mental health, anxiety, stress and misunderstanding, including fear of illness. To advance these lines of argument, this article relies on original data from participant observation and site visits, 29 semi-structured interviews (with 38 research respondents) and four focus groups. Based on these data, we find that the current imperative driving solar expansion raises profound and timely concerns, which are intensified by global, federal and, most immediately, state calls to accelerate and streamline solar production in California Deserts and beyond. The levels of extractive production, consumption and consequently material and energy use remain a structural problem, threatening the positive sociological potential of solar energy development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Desert ecosystems have experienced an intensive and increasingly rapid integration of solar energy projects into their landscapes. The social and ecological impact of solar energy is particularly pronounced in California, given aggressive state targets to decarbonize its electricity grid. Between 2010 and 2024, more than 230 utility-scale solar projects have been sited in the Mojave and Colorado deserts, which excludes the deployment of rooftop solar systems on residences. This article explores lived experiences of people who live among intensive solar development around the community of Blythe, California. While solar energy is regarded as a “clean,” socially just and democratic technology, the practical and intensive development of solar energy has sobering and deleterious results on the community and natural environment there. This article demonstrates how solar energy development entrenches inequality, perpetuates racism and continues a trajectory of ecological degradation. It includes material and ecological harm, but also issues of aggravated mental health, anxiety, stress and misunderstanding, including fear of illness. To advance these lines of argument, this article relies on original data from participant observation and site visits, 29 semi-structured interviews (with 38 research respondents) and four focus groups. Based on these data, we find that the current imperative driving solar expansion raises profound and timely concerns, which are intensified by global, federal and, most immediately, state calls to accelerate and streamline solar production in California Deserts and beyond. The levels of extractive production, consumption and consequently material and energy use remain a structural problem, threatening the positive sociological potential of solar energy development.
"我们的小镇正在消亡:"探索加利福尼亚东南部公用事业规模和屋顶太阳能的不公正现象
沙漠生态系统经历了太阳能项目与地貌密集且日益快速的融合。在加利福尼亚州,太阳能对社会和生态的影响尤为明显,因为该州正在积极实现电网去碳化的目标。从 2010 年到 2024 年,莫哈韦沙漠和科罗拉多沙漠已建成 230 多个公用事业规模的太阳能项目,其中不包括在居民屋顶部署太阳能系统。本文探讨了生活在加利福尼亚州布莱斯社区周围密集的太阳能开发项目中的人们的生活经验。虽然太阳能被认为是一种 "清洁"、社会公正和民主的技术,但太阳能的实际和密集开发却对当地社区和自然环境造成了令人警醒的有害影响。这篇文章展示了太阳能开发是如何使不平等现象根深蒂固、使种族主义长期存在,并继续生态退化的轨迹。这不仅包括物质和生态危害,还包括心理健康恶化、焦虑、压力和误解等问题,包括对疾病的恐惧。为了推进这些论点,本文依据的原始数据来自参与观察和实地考察、29 次半结构式访谈(38 位研究对象)和 4 个焦点小组。基于这些数据,我们发现当前推动太阳能扩张的迫切需求引发了深刻而及时的担忧,而全球、联邦以及最直接的州政府要求加快和简化加利福尼亚沙漠及其他地区太阳能生产的呼吁则加剧了这种担忧。采掘业的生产、消费水平以及随之而来的材料和能源使用仍然是一个结构性问题,威胁着太阳能发展的积极社会学潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信