Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jacob Morey MD, MBA, Richard Winters MD, MBA, Derick Jones MD, MBA
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters","authors":"Jacob Morey MD, MBA,&nbsp;Richard Winters MD, MBA,&nbsp;Derick Jones MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>To use artificial intelligence (AI) to predict billing code levels for emergency department (ED) encounters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We accessed ED encounters from our health system from January to September 2023. We developed an ensemble model using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to predict billing codes from clinical notes combined with clinical characteristics and orders. Explainable AI techniques were used to help determine the important model features. The main endpoint was to predict evaluation and management professional billing codes (levels 2 to 5 [Current Procedural Terminology codes 99282 to 99285] and critical care). Secondary endpoints included predicting professional billing codes at different decision boundary thresholds and generalizability of the model at other EDs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 321,893 adult ED encounters coded at levels 2 (&lt;1%), 3 (5%), 4 (38%), 5 (51%), and critical care (5%). Model performance for professional billing code levels of 4 and 5 yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.94 and 0.95, accuracy values of 0.80 and 0.92, and F1-scores of 0.79 and 0.91, respectively. At a 95% decision boundary threshold, level 5 predicted charts had a precision/positive predictive value of 0.99 and recall/sensitivity of 0.57. The most important features using Shapley Additive Explanations values were critical care note, number of orders, discharge disposition, cardiology, and psychiatry.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Currently available AI models accurately predict billing code levels for ED encounters based on clinical notes, clinical characteristics, and orders. This has the potential to automate coding of ED encounters and save administrative costs and time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"85 1","pages":"Pages 63-73"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064424004050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

To use artificial intelligence (AI) to predict billing code levels for emergency department (ED) encounters.

Methods

We accessed ED encounters from our health system from January to September 2023. We developed an ensemble model using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to predict billing codes from clinical notes combined with clinical characteristics and orders. Explainable AI techniques were used to help determine the important model features. The main endpoint was to predict evaluation and management professional billing codes (levels 2 to 5 [Current Procedural Terminology codes 99282 to 99285] and critical care). Secondary endpoints included predicting professional billing codes at different decision boundary thresholds and generalizability of the model at other EDs.

Results

There were 321,893 adult ED encounters coded at levels 2 (<1%), 3 (5%), 4 (38%), 5 (51%), and critical care (5%). Model performance for professional billing code levels of 4 and 5 yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.94 and 0.95, accuracy values of 0.80 and 0.92, and F1-scores of 0.79 and 0.91, respectively. At a 95% decision boundary threshold, level 5 predicted charts had a precision/positive predictive value of 0.99 and recall/sensitivity of 0.57. The most important features using Shapley Additive Explanations values were critical care note, number of orders, discharge disposition, cardiology, and psychiatry.

Conclusion

Currently available AI models accurately predict billing code levels for ED encounters based on clinical notes, clinical characteristics, and orders. This has the potential to automate coding of ED encounters and save administrative costs and time.
人工智能预测急诊科就诊者的计费代码级别。
研究目的使用人工智能(AI)预测急诊科(ED)就诊的计费代码水平。方法我们从医疗系统中获取了 2023 年 1 月至 9 月的 ED 就诊记录。我们使用自然语言处理和机器学习技术开发了一个集合模型,以根据临床笔记结合临床特征和医嘱预测计费代码。可解释人工智能技术用于帮助确定重要的模型特征。主要终点是预测评估和管理专业计费代码(2 至 5 级[当前程序术语代码 99282 至 99285] 和重症监护)。次要终点包括预测不同决策边界阈值下的专业计费代码,以及该模型在其他急诊室的通用性。结果:共有 321,893 次成人急诊室就诊被编码为 2 级(<1%)、3 级(5%)、4 级(38%)、5 级(51%)和重症监护(5%)。专业计费代码级别为 4 和 5 的模型性能的接收者工作特征曲线下面积值分别为 0.94 和 0.95,准确度值分别为 0.80 和 0.92,F1 分数分别为 0.79 和 0.91。在 95% 的决策边界阈值下,第 5 级预测图表的精确度/阳性预测值为 0.99,召回率/灵敏度为 0.57。使用 Shapley Additive Explanations 值的最重要特征是重症护理记录、医嘱数量、出院处置、心脏病学和精神病学。这有可能实现急诊室就诊的自动编码,节省管理成本和时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信