Implementation of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following surgery for abdominal trauma; Assessment of feasibility and outcomes: A randomized controlled trial (RCT)

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Vibhu Jain , Santhosh Irrinki , Siddhant Khare , Kailash Chand Kurdia , Sathish Subbiah Nagaraj , Yashwant Raj Sakaray , Ajay Savlania , Cherring Tandup , Prerna Verma , Lileshwar Kaman
{"title":"Implementation of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following surgery for abdominal trauma; Assessment of feasibility and outcomes: A randomized controlled trial (RCT)","authors":"Vibhu Jain ,&nbsp;Santhosh Irrinki ,&nbsp;Siddhant Khare ,&nbsp;Kailash Chand Kurdia ,&nbsp;Sathish Subbiah Nagaraj ,&nbsp;Yashwant Raj Sakaray ,&nbsp;Ajay Savlania ,&nbsp;Cherring Tandup ,&nbsp;Prerna Verma ,&nbsp;Lileshwar Kaman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) is a set of multiple perioperative care component not a rigid protocol with improved outcomes for elective surgeries. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial(RCT). Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy following trauma were randomized into ERAS(early removal of catheters, early mobilization and initiation of diet, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia) and conventional care groups 24 ​h post-surgery. Outcome measures included length of hospitalization(LOH), recovery of bowel function, duration of removal of catheters and 30-day complications(Clavien-Dindo).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty patients were randomized into ERAS(n ​= ​25) and conventional care(n ​= ​25) groups. Ninety-two percent of patients were young males, 58 ​% had blunt trauma to the abdomen and the most common indication of surgery was hollow viscus injury(88 ​%). ERAS group had a reduced median LOH(days) (6 versus 8, p ​= ​0.007), early recovery of bowel function(p ​= ​0.010) and shorter times for nasogastric tube(p ​= ​0.001), urinary catheter(p ​= ​0.007) and drain(p ​= ​0.006) removal. The complications were comparable in both groups except for deep surgical site infection[significantly lower in ERAS group(p ​= ​0.009)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ERAS is safe and significantly reduces LOH in select trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 115975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) is a set of multiple perioperative care component not a rigid protocol with improved outcomes for elective surgeries. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.

Study design

Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial(RCT). Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy following trauma were randomized into ERAS(early removal of catheters, early mobilization and initiation of diet, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia) and conventional care groups 24 ​h post-surgery. Outcome measures included length of hospitalization(LOH), recovery of bowel function, duration of removal of catheters and 30-day complications(Clavien-Dindo).

Results

Fifty patients were randomized into ERAS(n ​= ​25) and conventional care(n ​= ​25) groups. Ninety-two percent of patients were young males, 58 ​% had blunt trauma to the abdomen and the most common indication of surgery was hollow viscus injury(88 ​%). ERAS group had a reduced median LOH(days) (6 versus 8, p ​= ​0.007), early recovery of bowel function(p ​= ​0.010) and shorter times for nasogastric tube(p ​= ​0.001), urinary catheter(p ​= ​0.007) and drain(p ​= ​0.006) removal. The complications were comparable in both groups except for deep surgical site infection[significantly lower in ERAS group(p ​= ​0.009)].

Conclusion

ERAS is safe and significantly reduces LOH in select trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.
腹部创伤手术后实施改良的术后强化恢复(ERAS);可行性和结果评估:随机对照试验 (RCT)
研究背景术后强化恢复(ERAS)是一套多重围手术期护理方案,而非僵化的方案,可改善择期手术的疗效。本研究旨在评估接受开腹手术的创伤患者的可行性和疗效。研究设计前瞻性单中心随机对照试验(RCT)。在创伤后接受紧急开腹手术的患者在手术后24小时被随机分为ERAS组(早期拔除导管、早期活动和开始饮食、使用阿片类稀释多模式镇痛)和常规护理组。结果50名患者被随机分为ERAS组(25人)和常规护理组(25人)。92%的患者为年轻男性,58%的患者为腹部钝性创伤,最常见的手术指征为空腔脏器损伤(88%)。ERAS 组的中位 LOH(天数)减少(6 对 8,p = 0.007),肠道功能恢复早(p = 0.010),鼻胃管(p = 0.001)、导尿管(p = 0.007)和引流管(p = 0.006)拔除时间短。除了深部手术部位感染[ERAS 组明显较低(p = 0.009)],两组的并发症情况相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信