The effectiveness of Function Focused Care among patients acutely admitted to hospital: A stepped wedge cluster trial

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Selma Kok , Lisette Schoonhoven , Lisette M. Vernooij , Johannes B. Reitsma , Carolien Verstraten , Silke F. Metzelthin , Nienke Bleijenberg , Janneke M. de Man-van Ginkel
{"title":"The effectiveness of Function Focused Care among patients acutely admitted to hospital: A stepped wedge cluster trial","authors":"Selma Kok ,&nbsp;Lisette Schoonhoven ,&nbsp;Lisette M. Vernooij ,&nbsp;Johannes B. Reitsma ,&nbsp;Carolien Verstraten ,&nbsp;Silke F. Metzelthin ,&nbsp;Nienke Bleijenberg ,&nbsp;Janneke M. de Man-van Ginkel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>During acute hospital admission, patients often experience loss of functional status. A low level of physical activity is associated with higher levels of loss of functional status. Stimulating physical activity to maintain functional status is considered essential nursing care. Function Focused Care is a promising approach stimulating physical activity. In a previous study, Function Focused Care in Hospital was deemed feasible.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the effectiveness of Function Focused Care in Hospital compared with usual care on the functional status of hospitalized stroke and geriatric patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A multicenter stepped wedge cluster trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A neurological and a geriatric ward of an academic hospital and a general hospital in the Netherlands participated in this study; each was considered a cluster in the trial. The primary outcome was patients' functional status over time, measured with the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale. Secondary outcomes were the patients' length of stay, fear of falling, self-efficacy, motivation, resilience, and outcome expectations for functional and exercise activities. Data was collected at hospital admission (baseline), day of discharge, and three and six months after discharge via patient files and questionnaires and analyzed with generalized linear mixed models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, we included 892 patients, of which 427 received Function Focused Care in Hospital and 465 received usual care. Although we did not find significant differences in the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale at discharge or follow-up, we found a significant decrease in the mean length of stay (−<!--> <!-->3.3 days, 95 % CI −<!--> <!-->5.3 to −<!--> <!-->1.1) in favor of the Function Focused Care in Hospital group. In addition, in the Function Focused Care in Hospital group, a larger proportion of patients were discharged to home compared to the control group (38.2 % vs. 29.0 %, p = 0.017), who were discharged more often to a care facility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The length of hospital stay was substantially decreased, and discharge to home was more common in the group receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital with equal levels of independence in Activities of Daily Living and mobility in both groups upon discharge. Although significant differences in the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale were not found, we observed that neurological and geriatric patients were discharged significantly earlier compared to the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div><span><span>https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/24287</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (date of first recruitment: 05-02-2016).</div><div><strong>Tweetable abstract</strong>: Patients receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital were discharged from the hospital 3.3 days earlier and discharged home more often than the group of patients receiving care as usual. @umcutrecht @hogeschoolutrecht.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104893"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002062/pdfft?md5=187a9de7c15a50e29856ddee8fa3d226&pid=1-s2.0-S0020748924002062-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924002062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

During acute hospital admission, patients often experience loss of functional status. A low level of physical activity is associated with higher levels of loss of functional status. Stimulating physical activity to maintain functional status is considered essential nursing care. Function Focused Care is a promising approach stimulating physical activity. In a previous study, Function Focused Care in Hospital was deemed feasible.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of Function Focused Care in Hospital compared with usual care on the functional status of hospitalized stroke and geriatric patients.

Design

A multicenter stepped wedge cluster trial.

Methods

A neurological and a geriatric ward of an academic hospital and a general hospital in the Netherlands participated in this study; each was considered a cluster in the trial. The primary outcome was patients' functional status over time, measured with the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale. Secondary outcomes were the patients' length of stay, fear of falling, self-efficacy, motivation, resilience, and outcome expectations for functional and exercise activities. Data was collected at hospital admission (baseline), day of discharge, and three and six months after discharge via patient files and questionnaires and analyzed with generalized linear mixed models.

Results

In total, we included 892 patients, of which 427 received Function Focused Care in Hospital and 465 received usual care. Although we did not find significant differences in the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale at discharge or follow-up, we found a significant decrease in the mean length of stay (− 3.3 days, 95 % CI − 5.3 to − 1.1) in favor of the Function Focused Care in Hospital group. In addition, in the Function Focused Care in Hospital group, a larger proportion of patients were discharged to home compared to the control group (38.2 % vs. 29.0 %, p = 0.017), who were discharged more often to a care facility.

Conclusion

The length of hospital stay was substantially decreased, and discharge to home was more common in the group receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital with equal levels of independence in Activities of Daily Living and mobility in both groups upon discharge. Although significant differences in the Barthel Index and Elderly Mobility Scale were not found, we observed that neurological and geriatric patients were discharged significantly earlier compared to the control group.

Registration

https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/24287 (date of first recruitment: 05-02-2016).
Tweetable abstract: Patients receiving Function Focused Care in Hospital were discharged from the hospital 3.3 days earlier and discharged home more often than the group of patients receiving care as usual. @umcutrecht @hogeschoolutrecht.
功能集中护理在急诊入院患者中的效果:阶梯式楔形分组试验
背景在急性入院期间,患者经常会出现功能丧失的情况。低水平的体力活动与较高水平的功能丧失有关。刺激体力活动以维持功能状态被认为是必要的护理。以功能为重点的护理是一种很有前景的刺激身体活动的方法。方法 荷兰一家学术医院和一家综合医院的神经科和老年病科病房参与了这项研究;每家医院都被视为试验中的一个群组。主要结果是患者在一段时间内的功能状态,采用巴特尔指数和老年人活动能力量表进行测量。次要结果是患者的住院时间、对跌倒的恐惧、自我效能感、动机、恢复力以及对功能和锻炼活动的结果预期。我们通过患者档案和问卷调查收集了入院时(基线)、出院当天、出院后三个月和六个月的数据,并采用广义线性混合模型进行了分析。结果我们共纳入了 892 名患者,其中 427 人接受了医院功能聚焦护理,465 人接受了常规护理。虽然我们没有发现出院时或随访时 Barthel 指数和老年人活动能力量表有明显差异,但我们发现住院时间的平均值明显缩短(- 3.3 天,95 % CI - 5.3 至 - 1.1),而功能集中型住院护理组更明显。此外,与对照组(38.2% vs. 29.0%,p = 0.017)相比,功能集中型住院护理组患者出院回家的比例更高,而对照组患者出院后更多地选择了护理机构。结论接受功能集中型住院护理组患者的住院时间大幅缩短,出院回家的比例更高,两组患者出院后在日常生活活动和行动能力方面的独立性水平相当。虽然在巴特尔指数和老年人活动能力量表方面未发现明显差异,但我们观察到,与对照组相比,神经系统和老年病患者出院时间明显提前。Registrationhttps://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/24287(首次招募日期:2016-02-05)。Tweetable摘要:与接受常规护理的患者组相比,接受住院功能集中护理的患者出院时间提前了3.3天,出院回家的次数也更多。@umcutrecht @hogeschoolutrecht.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信