Jade A. Fox , Nicolette Graham , Rachael Lawson , Sonya Stacey , Julia E. Clark
{"title":"Intermittent micafungin dosing schedule in pediatric oncology patients ‐ safe for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy?","authors":"Jade A. Fox , Nicolette Graham , Rachael Lawson , Sonya Stacey , Julia E. Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2024.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Antifungal prophylaxis is an important preventative strategy for high-risk pediatric oncology patients. When triazoles are contraindicated, micafungin is an alternative to polyenes, due to improved tolerability and limited drug-drug interactions. An intermittent dosing schedule is advantageous for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but studies assessing safety in pediatric patients are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-centre, retrospective, observational study compared the safety and tolerability of daily (1 mg/kg) and intermittent (3 mg/kg) dosing of amphotericin B liposomal (AmB) and micafungin in children under 18 years, with high-risk leukemia. Results</div><div>Of 51 patients, with 76 individual dosing schedules, hepatoxicity and nephrotoxicity were comparable across all four dosing schedules. Severity of hypokalemia was significantly higher amongst patients receiving AmB (p = 0.041), with higher rates of intravenous electrolyte supplementation required. Infusion-related reactions occurred only in the AmB group (22 %). Intermittent administration and dosing of micafungin was well tolerated, with similar effects on liver function and reduced rates of hypokalemia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study supports the positive safety profile of intermittent micafungin compared with AmB and describes successful OPAT implementation. Prospective studies assessing efficacy are needed to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000497/pdfft?md5=fa11363a66340b24b7817e007bb8348e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772610X24000497-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X24000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Antifungal prophylaxis is an important preventative strategy for high-risk pediatric oncology patients. When triazoles are contraindicated, micafungin is an alternative to polyenes, due to improved tolerability and limited drug-drug interactions. An intermittent dosing schedule is advantageous for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but studies assessing safety in pediatric patients are limited.
Methods
This single-centre, retrospective, observational study compared the safety and tolerability of daily (1 mg/kg) and intermittent (3 mg/kg) dosing of amphotericin B liposomal (AmB) and micafungin in children under 18 years, with high-risk leukemia. Results
Of 51 patients, with 76 individual dosing schedules, hepatoxicity and nephrotoxicity were comparable across all four dosing schedules. Severity of hypokalemia was significantly higher amongst patients receiving AmB (p = 0.041), with higher rates of intravenous electrolyte supplementation required. Infusion-related reactions occurred only in the AmB group (22 %). Intermittent administration and dosing of micafungin was well tolerated, with similar effects on liver function and reduced rates of hypokalemia.
Conclusion
This study supports the positive safety profile of intermittent micafungin compared with AmB and describes successful OPAT implementation. Prospective studies assessing efficacy are needed to validate these findings.