Time series sUAV data reveal moderate accuracy and large uncertainties in spring phenology metric of deciduous broadleaf forest as estimated by vegetation index-based phenological models
Li Pan , Xiangming Xiao , Haoming Xia , Xiaoyan Ma , Yanhua Xie , Baihong Pan , Yuanwei Qin
{"title":"Time series sUAV data reveal moderate accuracy and large uncertainties in spring phenology metric of deciduous broadleaf forest as estimated by vegetation index-based phenological models","authors":"Li Pan , Xiangming Xiao , Haoming Xia , Xiaoyan Ma , Yanhua Xie , Baihong Pan , Yuanwei Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate delineation of spring phenology (e.g., start of growing season, SOS) of deciduous forests is essential for understanding its responses to environmental changes. To date, SOS dates from analyses of satellite images and vegetation index (VI) −based phenological models have notable discrepancies but they have not been fully evaluated, primarily due to the lack of ground reference data for evaluation. This study evaluated the SOS dates of a deciduous broadleaf forest estimated by VI-based phenological models from three satellite sensors (PlanetScope, Sentinel-2A/B, and Landsat-7/8/9) by using ground reference data collected by a small unmanned aerial vehicle (sUAV). Daily sUAV imagery (0.035-meter resolution) was used to identify and generate green leaf maps. These green leaf maps were further aggregated to generate Green Leaf Fraction (GLF) maps at the spatial resolutions of PlanetScope (3-meter), Sentinel-2A/B (10-meter), and Landsat-7/8/9 (30-meter). The temporal changes of GLF differ from those of vegetation indices in spring, with the peak dates of GLF being much earlier than those of VIs. At the SOS dates estimated by VI-based phenological models in 2022 (Julian days from 105 to 111), GLF already ranges from 62% to 96%. The moderate accuracy and large uncertainties of SOS dates from VI-based phenological models arise from the limitations of vegetation indices in accurately tracking the number of green leaves and the inherent uncertainties of the mathematical models used. The results of this study clearly highlight the need for new research on spring phenology of deciduous forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50269,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"218 ","pages":"Pages 339-351"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271624003605","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate delineation of spring phenology (e.g., start of growing season, SOS) of deciduous forests is essential for understanding its responses to environmental changes. To date, SOS dates from analyses of satellite images and vegetation index (VI) −based phenological models have notable discrepancies but they have not been fully evaluated, primarily due to the lack of ground reference data for evaluation. This study evaluated the SOS dates of a deciduous broadleaf forest estimated by VI-based phenological models from three satellite sensors (PlanetScope, Sentinel-2A/B, and Landsat-7/8/9) by using ground reference data collected by a small unmanned aerial vehicle (sUAV). Daily sUAV imagery (0.035-meter resolution) was used to identify and generate green leaf maps. These green leaf maps were further aggregated to generate Green Leaf Fraction (GLF) maps at the spatial resolutions of PlanetScope (3-meter), Sentinel-2A/B (10-meter), and Landsat-7/8/9 (30-meter). The temporal changes of GLF differ from those of vegetation indices in spring, with the peak dates of GLF being much earlier than those of VIs. At the SOS dates estimated by VI-based phenological models in 2022 (Julian days from 105 to 111), GLF already ranges from 62% to 96%. The moderate accuracy and large uncertainties of SOS dates from VI-based phenological models arise from the limitations of vegetation indices in accurately tracking the number of green leaves and the inherent uncertainties of the mathematical models used. The results of this study clearly highlight the need for new research on spring phenology of deciduous forests.
期刊介绍:
The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) serves as the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). It acts as a platform for scientists and professionals worldwide who are involved in various disciplines that utilize photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The journal aims to facilitate communication and dissemination of advancements in these disciplines, while also acting as a comprehensive source of reference and archive.
P&RS endeavors to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers that are preferably original and have not been published before. These papers can cover scientific/research, technological development, or application/practical aspects. Additionally, the journal welcomes papers that are based on presentations from ISPRS meetings, as long as they are considered significant contributions to the aforementioned fields.
In particular, P&RS encourages the submission of papers that are of broad scientific interest, showcase innovative applications (especially in emerging fields), have an interdisciplinary focus, discuss topics that have received limited attention in P&RS or related journals, or explore new directions in scientific or professional realms. It is preferred that theoretical papers include practical applications, while papers focusing on systems and applications should include a theoretical background.