Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane on Erections during Narcosis in Transurethral Surgery: The PENIS Trial

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Thomas P. Scherer , Corinna von Deschwanden , Ulrike Held , Cédric Poyet , Jia-Lun Kwok , Lukas Kandler , Martin Schläpfer , Etienne X. Keller , Florian A. Schmid
{"title":"Effect of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane on Erections during Narcosis in Transurethral Surgery: The PENIS Trial","authors":"Thomas P. Scherer ,&nbsp;Corinna von Deschwanden ,&nbsp;Ulrike Held ,&nbsp;Cédric Poyet ,&nbsp;Jia-Lun Kwok ,&nbsp;Lukas Kandler ,&nbsp;Martin Schläpfer ,&nbsp;Etienne X. Keller ,&nbsp;Florian A. Schmid","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Penile erection is unwanted during transurethral interventions as it may be associated with adverse events such as impaired access, prolonged operation time, abortion of the procedure, or a need for ancillary measures to reach penis flaccidity, such as intracorporeal injection of vasoactive drugs. In recent years, anesthesia with propofol has been favored over sevoflurane for environmental reasons. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no prospective randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of general narcosis medications on the risk of such unwanted penile erections during transurethral surgery. To fill this gap, we have planned a prospective, double-blind (surgeon and patient), single-center, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome is the occurrence of an intraoperative penile erection. The secondary outcomes are related to the impact of the primary outcome on the surgery, such as changes in operative strategy or operation duration, abortion of the procedure, and adverse events. The plan is to randomize 200 patients undergoing transurethral surgery to receive general anesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion criteria are men aged &lt;75 yr with an International Index of Erectile Function-5 score of ≥12 points. All men fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate. Exclusion criteria are patient characteristics associated with a higher risk of complications with the use of either propofol or sevoflurane. Randomization and treatment allocation will occur after patients give consent. The results will be statistically analyzed using a logistic regression model. This research has received ethical clearance from the local ethics committee (KEK code 2023-01682). The trial is registered on the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000005681) and on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT06378645).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324006505/pdfft?md5=e7d18149f5e3ac9932c92f817cad5efa&pid=1-s2.0-S2666168324006505-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168324006505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penile erection is unwanted during transurethral interventions as it may be associated with adverse events such as impaired access, prolonged operation time, abortion of the procedure, or a need for ancillary measures to reach penis flaccidity, such as intracorporeal injection of vasoactive drugs. In recent years, anesthesia with propofol has been favored over sevoflurane for environmental reasons. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no prospective randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of general narcosis medications on the risk of such unwanted penile erections during transurethral surgery. To fill this gap, we have planned a prospective, double-blind (surgeon and patient), single-center, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome is the occurrence of an intraoperative penile erection. The secondary outcomes are related to the impact of the primary outcome on the surgery, such as changes in operative strategy or operation duration, abortion of the procedure, and adverse events. The plan is to randomize 200 patients undergoing transurethral surgery to receive general anesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane. The inclusion criteria are men aged <75 yr with an International Index of Erectile Function-5 score of ≥12 points. All men fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be asked to participate. Exclusion criteria are patient characteristics associated with a higher risk of complications with the use of either propofol or sevoflurane. Randomization and treatment allocation will occur after patients give consent. The results will be statistically analyzed using a logistic regression model. This research has received ethical clearance from the local ethics committee (KEK code 2023-01682). The trial is registered on the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000005681) and on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT06378645).
丙泊酚与七氟醚对经尿道手术麻醉期间勃起的影响:PENIS 试验
阴茎勃起在经尿道介入手术中是不受欢迎的,因为它可能会导致一些不良事件,如手术通道受阻、手术时间延长、手术流产,或需要采取辅助措施(如体外注射血管活性药物)以达到阴茎松弛的目的。近年来,由于环境原因,丙泊酚麻醉比七氟醚更受青睐。据我们所知,目前还没有前瞻性随机临床试验来评估全身麻醉药物对经尿道手术中阴茎勃起风险的影响。为了填补这一空白,我们计划进行一项前瞻性、双盲(外科医生和患者)、单中心、随机对照试验。主要结果是术中阴茎勃起的发生率。次要结果与主要结果对手术的影响有关,如手术策略或手术时间的改变、手术流产和不良事件。计划随机抽取 200 名接受经尿道手术的患者,让他们接受异丙酚或七氟醚全身麻醉。纳入标准为年龄在 75 岁以上、国际勃起功能指数-5 评分≥12 分的男性。所有符合纳入标准的男性都将被要求参加。排除标准是与使用异丙酚或七氟醚并发症风险较高相关的患者特征。随机化和治疗分配将在患者同意后进行。研究结果将使用逻辑回归模型进行统计分析。该研究已获得当地伦理委员会的伦理许可(KEK 代码 2023-01682)。该试验已在瑞士国家临床试验门户网站(SNCTP000005681)和ClinicalTrial.gov(NCT06378645)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信