Mokter M. Chowdhury, Robinson Cortes-Huerto, Debashish Mukherji
{"title":"Smart Polymer Solution and Thermal Conductivity: How Important Is an Exact Polymer Conformation?","authors":"Mokter M. Chowdhury, Robinson Cortes-Huerto, Debashish Mukherji","doi":"10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heat management in devices is the key to their efficiency and longevity. Here, thermal switches (TS) are of great importance because of their ability to transition between different thermal conductivity κ states. While traditional TS are bulky and slow, recent experiments have suggested “smart” responsive (bioinspired) polymers as their fast alternatives. One example is poly(<i>N</i>-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) in water, where κ drops suddenly around a temperature <i></i><span style=\"color: inherit;\"></span><span data-mathml='<math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mi>T</mi><mi mathvariant=\"script\">l</mi></msub></math>' role=\"presentation\" style=\"position: relative;\" tabindex=\"0\"><nobr aria-hidden=\"true\"><span overflow=\"scroll\" style=\"width: 1.139em; display: inline-block;\"><span style=\"display: inline-block; position: relative; width: 1.026em; height: 0px; font-size: 110%;\"><span style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1.366em, 1001.03em, 2.503em, -999.997em); top: -2.156em; left: 0em;\"><span><span><span style=\"display: inline-block; position: relative; width: 1.026em; height: 0px;\"><span style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(3.185em, 1000.68em, 4.151em, -999.997em); top: -3.974em; left: 0em;\"><span style=\"font-family: STIXMathJax_Normal-italic;\">𝑇<span style=\"display: inline-block; overflow: hidden; height: 1px; width: 0.116em;\"></span></span><span style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; height: 3.98em;\"></span></span><span style=\"position: absolute; top: -3.804em; left: 0.571em;\"><span style=\"font-size: 70.7%; font-family: STIXMathJax_Script-italic;\">𝓁</span><span style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; height: 3.98em;\"></span></span></span></span></span><span style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; height: 2.162em;\"></span></span></span><span style=\"display: inline-block; overflow: hidden; vertical-align: -0.247em; border-left: 0px solid; width: 0px; height: 1.003em;\"></span></span></nobr><span role=\"presentation\"><math display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><msub><mi>T</mi><mi mathvariant=\"script\">l</mi></msub></math></span></span><script type=\"math/mml\"><math display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mi>T</mi><mi mathvariant=\"script\">l</mi></msub></math></script> ≃ 305 K when PNIPAM undergoes a coil-to-globule transition. At first glance, this may suggest that the change in polymer conformation has a direct influence on TS. However, it may be presumptuous to trivially “only” link conformations with TS, especially because many complex microscopic details control macroscopic conformational transition. Motivated by this, we study TS in “smart” polymers using generic molecular dynamics simulations. As the test cases, we investigate two different modes of polymer collapse using external stimuli, i.e., changing <i>T</i> and cosolvent mole fraction <i>x</i><sub>c</sub>. Collapse upon increasing <i>T</i> shows a direct correlation between the conformation and κ switching, while no correlation is observed in the latter case. These results suggest that the (co)solvent–monomer interactions play a greater important role than the exact conformation in dictating TS. While some results are compared with the available experiments, possible future directions are also highlighted.","PeriodicalId":51,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecules","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecules","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heat management in devices is the key to their efficiency and longevity. Here, thermal switches (TS) are of great importance because of their ability to transition between different thermal conductivity κ states. While traditional TS are bulky and slow, recent experiments have suggested “smart” responsive (bioinspired) polymers as their fast alternatives. One example is poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) in water, where κ drops suddenly around a temperature 𝑇𝓁 ≃ 305 K when PNIPAM undergoes a coil-to-globule transition. At first glance, this may suggest that the change in polymer conformation has a direct influence on TS. However, it may be presumptuous to trivially “only” link conformations with TS, especially because many complex microscopic details control macroscopic conformational transition. Motivated by this, we study TS in “smart” polymers using generic molecular dynamics simulations. As the test cases, we investigate two different modes of polymer collapse using external stimuli, i.e., changing T and cosolvent mole fraction xc. Collapse upon increasing T shows a direct correlation between the conformation and κ switching, while no correlation is observed in the latter case. These results suggest that the (co)solvent–monomer interactions play a greater important role than the exact conformation in dictating TS. While some results are compared with the available experiments, possible future directions are also highlighted.
期刊介绍:
Macromolecules publishes original, fundamental, and impactful research on all aspects of polymer science. Topics of interest include synthesis (e.g., controlled polymerizations, polymerization catalysis, post polymerization modification, new monomer structures and polymer architectures, and polymerization mechanisms/kinetics analysis); phase behavior, thermodynamics, dynamic, and ordering/disordering phenomena (e.g., self-assembly, gelation, crystallization, solution/melt/solid-state characteristics); structure and properties (e.g., mechanical and rheological properties, surface/interfacial characteristics, electronic and transport properties); new state of the art characterization (e.g., spectroscopy, scattering, microscopy, rheology), simulation (e.g., Monte Carlo, molecular dynamics, multi-scale/coarse-grained modeling), and theoretical methods. Renewable/sustainable polymers, polymer networks, responsive polymers, electro-, magneto- and opto-active macromolecules, inorganic polymers, charge-transporting polymers (ion-containing, semiconducting, and conducting), nanostructured polymers, and polymer composites are also of interest. Typical papers published in Macromolecules showcase important and innovative concepts, experimental methods/observations, and theoretical/computational approaches that demonstrate a fundamental advance in the understanding of polymers.