Impact of motion management strategies on abdominal organ at risk delineation for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Mairead Daly , Lisa McDaid , Carmel Anandadas , Andrew Brocklehurst , Ananya Choudhury , Alan McWilliam , Ganesh Radhakrishna , Cynthia L. Eccles
{"title":"Impact of motion management strategies on abdominal organ at risk delineation for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy","authors":"Mairead Daly ,&nbsp;Lisa McDaid ,&nbsp;Carmel Anandadas ,&nbsp;Andrew Brocklehurst ,&nbsp;Ananya Choudhury ,&nbsp;Alan McWilliam ,&nbsp;Ganesh Radhakrishna ,&nbsp;Cynthia L. Eccles","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>The impact of respiratory motion management strategies for abdominal radiotherapy, such as abdominal compression (AC) and breath hold (BH), on abdominal organ at risk (OAR) delineation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unknown. This feasibility study compared the inter- and intra- observer delineation variation on MRI acquired with AC, BH for three critical abdominal OAR.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>T2-weighted (W) 3D MRI in free-breathing (FB) and with AC, and T1W 3D mDixon exhale BH were acquired. Four observers blinded to motion management strategy used, delineated stomach, liver, and duodenum on all MRI. One case per strategy was repeated over 6 weeks later to quantify intra-observer variation. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours for each OAR were generated, median and IQR mean distance to agreement (mDTA) and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) between observer and STAPLE contours were calculated. Observers scored organ visibility on each MRI using a four-point Likert scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 27 scans including repeats were delineated. Pooled mDTA for all OARs was 1.3 mm (0.5 mm) with AC, 1.4 mm (1.0 mm) with BH, and 1.3 mm (0.5 mm) in FB. Intra-observer mDTA was highest for all organs in FB with 10.8 mm for duodenum, 1.8 mm for liver, and 2.7 mm for stomach. The pooled mean perceptual quality score value was highest for AC across organs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No motion management strategy demonstrated superior similarity across OAR, emphasizing the need for personalised approaches based on individual clinical and patient factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001209/pdfft?md5=3ca1884b9a70abce37c31b168701b85f&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

The impact of respiratory motion management strategies for abdominal radiotherapy, such as abdominal compression (AC) and breath hold (BH), on abdominal organ at risk (OAR) delineation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unknown. This feasibility study compared the inter- and intra- observer delineation variation on MRI acquired with AC, BH for three critical abdominal OAR.

Materials and methods

T2-weighted (W) 3D MRI in free-breathing (FB) and with AC, and T1W 3D mDixon exhale BH were acquired. Four observers blinded to motion management strategy used, delineated stomach, liver, and duodenum on all MRI. One case per strategy was repeated over 6 weeks later to quantify intra-observer variation. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours for each OAR were generated, median and IQR mean distance to agreement (mDTA) and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) between observer and STAPLE contours were calculated. Observers scored organ visibility on each MRI using a four-point Likert scale.

Results

A total of 27 scans including repeats were delineated. Pooled mDTA for all OARs was 1.3 mm (0.5 mm) with AC, 1.4 mm (1.0 mm) with BH, and 1.3 mm (0.5 mm) in FB. Intra-observer mDTA was highest for all organs in FB with 10.8 mm for duodenum, 1.8 mm for liver, and 2.7 mm for stomach. The pooled mean perceptual quality score value was highest for AC across organs.

Conclusions

No motion management strategy demonstrated superior similarity across OAR, emphasizing the need for personalised approaches based on individual clinical and patient factors.
运动管理策略对磁共振引导放疗中腹部危险器官划定的影响
背景和目的腹部放疗中的呼吸运动管理策略,如腹部加压(AC)和屏气(BH),对磁共振成像(MRI)上腹部危险器官(OAR)划分的影响尚不清楚。这项可行性研究比较了用 AC 和 BH 对三个关键腹部 OAR 进行 MRI 采集时观察者之间和观察者内部的划线差异。材料和方法采集了自由呼吸 (FB) 和 AC 时的二维加权(W)三维 MRI 以及 T1W 三维 mDixon 呼气 BH。四名观察者对所使用的运动管理策略保密,在所有 MRI 上划定胃、肝和十二指肠。6周后,每种策略重复一个病例,以量化观察者内部的差异。为每个 OAR 生成同步真相和性能水平估计 (STAPLE) 等值线,计算观察者与 STAPLE 等值线之间的中位数和 IQR 平均一致距离 (mDTA) 以及最大豪斯多夫距离 (HD)。观察者使用李克特四点量表对每个 MRI 上的器官可见度进行评分。在 AC、BH 和 FB 中,所有 OAR 的汇总 mDTA 分别为 1.3 毫米(0.5 毫米)、1.4 毫米(1.0 毫米)和 1.3 毫米(0.5 毫米)。在所有器官中,FB 的观察者内部 mDTA 最高,十二指肠为 10.8 毫米,肝脏为 1.8 毫米,胃为 2.7 毫米。结论:没有一种运动管理策略在 OAR 中显示出卓越的相似性,这强调了根据个人临床和患者因素采取个性化方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信